Racial Targeting Population Control

Exposing the abortion industry's targeting of minorities in America for abortion.
View more...
   EMBED

Share

  • Rating

  • Date

    December 1969
  • Size

    621.6KB
  • Views

    588
  • Categories

Preview only show first 6 pages with water mark for full document please download

Transcript

Racial Targeting and Population Control By Mark Crutcher | President, Life Dynamics Incorporated Carole Novielli | Researcher Renee Hobbs | Production Assistant Abstract In the summer of 2009, Life Dynamics released the documentary film, Maafa 21. Its basic contention is that terms like “population control” and “family planning” are code words for a genocidal effort aimed at minorities – primarily African-Americans. Among the many revelations documented in this film is that, as far back as the mid 1900s, some wellknown eugenicists were arguing that the most effective way they could advance their agenda would be to concentrate population control facilities within the targeted communities. Perhaps the most noted proponent of this concept was Gunnar Myrdal who discussed it in his 1944 book, An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. In Maafa 21, evidence is presented that Planned Parenthood and others within the abortion and family planning lobby took this approach when choosing locations for their facilities and that this practice continues to this day. The film also cites a study conducted by three American university researchers into the criteria used to decide the placement of U.S. polulation control facilities. Their finding was that the primary consideration in making this determination is not poverty but the percentage of blacks in the area. The initial response to this documentary from people defending these organizations was to claim that they focus their facilities on minority neighborhoods because that is where the need is. Almost immediately, however, they saw that this argument was creating a problem for them. Simply put, it is incompatible with one of their other arguments. For years, these people have consistently argued that the most effective way to reduce the number of abortions is to prevent unplanned pregnancies by making birth control chemicals, devices and information widely available. If that is true, in light of their concession that they have focused these things on the minority community, the obvious result should be that black women have the lowest pregnancy and abortion rates in the country. But to the contrary, in contemporary America, the rate of pregnancy among black women is almost three times as high as it is for white women and, though they make up less than 13% of the female population, black women have about 37% of the abortions. In other words, the family planning lobby’s argument that they concentrate their facilities in minority communities because that is where the need is, cannot be reconciled with their long espoused claim about the connection between contraception, pregnancy and abortion. Seeing that they had painted themselves into this corner, their options were to either abandon the assertion that contraception is the way to reduce abortion rates, or reverse field and start denying that their facilities are disproportionately placed into minority neighborhoods. They chose the latter. Virtually overnight, they went from claiming that they target minority communities with noble intentions to claiming that they don’t target them at all. Then, to support this revised strategy, they began quoting a new report by the Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI) showing that only one in 10 Planned Parenthood clinics is located in a minority community. Next, the media began publishing articles citing these stats in which AGI was routinely characterized as an independent entity. This was obviously done to give the stats an aura of credibility. It was also done despite the fact that the American media is fully aware that AGI is not an independent agency but is, instead, the research arm of Planned Parenthood and receives funding from Planned Parenthood. In fact, Alan Guttmacher was once the president of Planned Parenthood and vice-president of the American Eugenics Society. these predominately black ZIP codes. The problem is that, according to the formula used in the AGI study, not one of these Planned Parenthood facilities would show up in their report as being located in the black community despite the reality that 83% of them were located there. Clearly, AGI was “cooking the books.” They knew Planned Parenthood’s denial of racial targeting could not be sustained as long as certain large segments of their facilities were included in their statistics. So AGI cobbled together this absurd formula to make those facilities become statistically invisible. In this process, the media consistently quoted AGI’s stats at face value without questioning their accuracy or the methods by which they were derived. Methodology The reality is, the research in AGI’s report had been manipulated to yield pre-determined results. For example, only facilities that actually perform abortions were included. However, every Planned Parenthood facility in America either does abortions or refers for them, and in the chain of events that lead to an abortion each entity is equally responsible. Historically, the population control movement’s eugenic efforts have been primarily focused on the African-American community and that was the underlying theme of Maafa 21. In our research, however, we have seen unmistakable evidence that the family planning establishment is also ratcheting up its efforts to deal with the Hispanic population. It should also be pointed out that, in Maafa 21, the charge is that the genocide in question is being carried out with both abortion and birth control. Given that every Planned Parenthood facility provides one or both, AGI had no legitimate rationale for excluding any of them from its data. For that reason, this report was expanded to include them as well. Our mission was to document whether the population control movement has targeted black and/or Hispanic communities by placing facilities in areas where those minority populations are disproportionately represented. In a transparent effort to narrow the field even more, AGI also chose to only include facilities that perform over 400 abortions per year. Again, this was an arbitrary and inexplicable decision given that no commonly accepted principle or industry standard establishes that a facility doing 400 abortions is statistically relevant while one that does 399 is not. We began by creating a database of the ZIP codes for every Planned Parenthood facility in the United States. This list was generated from Planned Parenthood’s website. We then used United States Census Bureau figures to establish the percentage of black and Hispanic people residing within each of these ZIP codes as well as within each state. To appreciate the deception being perpetrated here, imagine a hypothetical scenario in which 10 of the 12 Planned Parenthood facilities in a state are located in predominately black ZIP codes. Two of those 10 facilities perform fewer than 400 abortions per year each. The remaining eight do not do abortions but refer their clients to abortion clinics located outside The resulting data allowed us to calculate how often these ZIP codes contain a higher proportion of blacks and/or Hispanics than the state in which they are located. Of equal importantance is that this data also gave us the size of those disparities. The results of those calculations are given in a chart found later in this report. 2 Within the American population control movement, Planned Parenthood is not the only player. Their efforts are augmented by hundreds of independent abortion clinics. These facilities are found nationwide and are generally affiliated with trade associations like the National Abortion Federation or the National Coalition of Abortion Providers. from that sample. We did not do that and, instead, included every facility in the country. This eliminated any claim that we used “selective inclusion or selective exclusion” to control the results. It should also be noted that all of our raw data came from the United States Census Bureau and is, thus, insulated against bias. The only limitation this source presented is that there is a lag time between when the government takes a census and when that information is compiled, analyzed and released to the public. For that reason, the latest information available to us was from the 2000 census. Although we would have preferred newer data, as a practical matter, the racial makeup of ZIP codes where these facilities are located would not change enough from one census to the next to have any material impact on our results. For this report, a second database was created of these facilities with their locations being subjected to the same “racial targeting” evaluation as the Planned Parenthood locations. Those results are in a second chart. (Since some Planned Parenthood facilities are also members of the National Abortion Federation or the National Coalition of Abortion Providers, we took measures to make certain that these two charts were purged of duplicates.) Accuracy The bottom line is, if there are errors, correcting them would be as likely to reinforce our findings as refute them. Additionally, in either case, they would be neither numerous enough nor large enough to substantially alter the overall findings. Any study of this nature includes several factors that can lead to errors. ZIP codes change; facilities close; new facilities open; facilities move to new locations; facilities change their names; some operate under multiple names and/or addresses, etcetera. It is also true that, in the highly unstable world of abortion clinics and population control facilities, these problems are even more pronounced. The Charts The first chart identifies the locations of Planned Parenthood population control facilities. Even though Planned Parenthood operates the largest chain of abortion clinics in the United States, it is not the case that every facility included here does abortions. However, among those that do not, every one refers for abortion, schedules abortions, or otherwise arranges abortions. In addition, each facility provides contraceptive drugs and/or devices. Considering the high number of potential mistakecausing areas, we made certain that once our data was gathered and calculated, it was checked, rechecked and checked again. One aspect of this study is that, due to the high volume of entries and calculations necessary to create these charts – approximately 3000 – it would take a lot of errors to significantly alter the overall results. Fortunately, the system we employed made sure that errors simply don’t exist in those numbers. As stated earlier, the second chart is for independent abortion clinics that are not affiliated with Planned Parenthood. In both charts, every state’s name is followed by their overall percentage of black and Hispanic populations. The “ZIP” column contains the ZIP codes in which population control facilities are located in that state. If a ZIP code is listed multiple times, it means there were that many facilities in that ZIP code. Another factor supporting the study’s accuracy is the fact that it was universal. It is common and accepted practice for those conducting this kind of research to examine a “representative sample” of the whole and then issue an analysis based on data extrapolated 3 The “BLACK” column gives the percentage of African-Americans who live in this ZIP code and the “COMP” column compares this percentage against the state’s overall percentage of African-Americans. When the “COMP” column is blank, it means that this ZIP code did not exceed the state’s percentage of black population. The last two columns provide the same data for the Hispanic population. As an example of how these charts work, the state of Florida shows to have a black population of 14.6%. In that state, Planned Parenthood has a facility in ZIP code 33617 which has a black population of 27.4%. This means that this facility is located in a ZIP code with an African-American population that is 187.6% that of the state. In reviewing this data, there are several things to keep in mind. The first is that the issue is not whether a ZIP code is predominately black or Hispanic but whether it is disproportionately black or Hispanic. Second, any infrequent or small gaps between the percentage of minorities in a ZIP code and the percentage of minorities in the corresponding state can be dismissed as “statistically meaningless.” But when those gaps are common enough or large enough that they cannot be rationally attributed to random chance, they constitute a pattern that could have only been created by design and intention. The question then becomes: at what point does a gap stop being insignificant and start being significant? Given the subjective nature of that question, the deciding principle has to be common sense. If a ZIP code’s percentage of black or Hispanic population is 102% of the state’s percentage, no reasonable person would consider that an indicator of racial targeting. However, when a state has multiple population control facilities in ZIP codes with minority populations that exceed 125% of the state’s overall minority population, common sense says that racial targeting is the plausible explanation. As the charts in this report will show, such a pattern is readily identifiable in the locations of America’s family planning and population control facilities. It should also be pointed out that these patterns are routinely considered indicative of racial targeting when it comes to other issues. For example, African-Americans suffer far more of the health problems associated with tobacco use than does the white population. Civil rights leaders have long contended that this is a direct result of the fact that large tobacco companies target a disproportionate percentage of their advertising and promotional efforts on the black community. In just one of many examples of this, research conducted relative to a lawsuit in Baltimore, Maryland, documented that 76% of the billboards in black neighborhoods featured tobacco advertising while that number was only 20% in white neighborhoods. A parallel situation has also been identified with alcohol. The catastrophic social and health problems associated with alcoholism are found in the black community to a much higher extent than they are in the white community. And again, black leaders have spent years pointing out that a primary cause of this is the fact that liquor merchandisers place a disproportionate percentage of their retail outlets in black neighborhoods. The visual evidence of this can be seen, first hand, by driving through predominately minority neighborhoods in almost any decent-sized city in America. It is also claimed that the alcohol content of some beverages marketed in these areas is measurably higher than the alcohol content of similar products sold elsewhere, and that certain cheap high-alcoholcontent products are sold only in liquor stores and convenience stores in black neighborhoods. There are many other examples of this sort of racial targeting. Moreover, the disastrous effects it has had on the targeted communities are easy to see. The encouraging thing is that, in recent years, some of the corporations responsible for this have been 4 dragged into the public spotlight by the news media. A few have even found themselves in lawsuits and Congressional hearings. the minority community than these corporations, they have been left free to push their eugenics agenda without scrutiny. The glaring exception is America’s family planning industry. Despite having more potential to destroy As the following charts show, when it comes to racial targeting, these people are not amateurs. CHART 1 – PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOCATIONS NOTE: In this chart as well as the one that follows, some ZIP codes show a percentage of minorities that exceeds 100%. This occured because a small number of Hispanics identify themselves as both black and Hispanic and are, therefore, counted twice by the Census Bureau. This phenomenon is rare and was identified in fewer than 10 of the ZIP codes included in this study. Black Population 26.0% Hispanic Population 1.7% ALABAMA ZIP BLACK COMP 35205 36609 40.0 % 28.4 % 153.8 % 109.2 % BLACK COMP 9.0 % 0.3 % 7.8 % 0.8 % 0.3 % 257.1 % 99508 99669 99701 99801 99835 85031 85032 85204 85224 85251 85281 85304 85338 85364 HISPANIC 222.8 % ZIP 152.9 % 123.5 % 85705 85712 85713 86001 86305 7.6 % 2.2 % 4.4 % 3.4 % 3.3 % 3.5% 4.1% [ continued ] BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 3.5 % 4.0 % 6.2 % 1.7 % 0.3 % 112.9 % 129.0 % 200.0 % 32.4 % 19.3 % 62.1 % 12.2 % 5.3 % 128.0 % COMP 107.3 % 254.4 % Black Population 15.7% Hispanic Population 3.2% ARKANSAS 185.3 % Black Population 3.1% Hispanic Population 25.3% ARIZONA ZIP 2.6 % 2.1 % COMP Black Population Hispanic Population ALASKA ZIP HISPANIC ARIZONA ZIP BLACK COMP 72204 72703 69.1 % 4.1 % 440.1 % HISPANIC 3.1 % 4.1 % COMP 128.1 % Black Population 6.7% Hispanic Population 32.4% CALIFORNIA BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 4.9 % 1.7 % 2.4 % 3.5 % 1.6 % 3.0 % 2.8 % 3.5 % 2.7 % 158.0 % 62.8 % 19.1 % 30.0 % 15.1 % 13.5 % 25.2 % 12.1 % 19.8 % 55.1 % 248.2 % 90003 90007 90016 90022 90029 90033 90033 90041 90260 32.2 % 12.8 % 47.9 % 0.5 % 2.8 % 1.5 % 1.5 % 2.3 % 11.5 % 480.5 % 191.0 % 714.9 % 66.4 % 58.2 % 44.2 % 96.3 % 61.0 % 92.3 % 92.3 % 38.6 % 50.0 % 204.9 % 179.6 % 136.4 % 297.2 % 188.2 % 284.8 % 284.8 % 119.1 % 154.3 % 112.9 % 112.9 % 118.5 % 217.7 % 5 171.6 % CALIFORNIA ZIP BLACK 90401 90602 90713 90806 91104 91303 91320 91405 91506 91732 91767 91786 91801 91911 92008 92021 92025 92101 92105 92108 92109 92109 92111 92114 92115 92126 92236 92270 92408 92506 92553 92627 92683 92691 92705 92805 92866 93003 93101 93301 93401 93454 93637 93710 93728 93901 93927 93955 94040 94086 94110 94509 94520 94530 94533 94559 94565 94583 4.2 % 1.3 % 3.1 % 20.5 % 14.4 % 4.0 % 1.2 % 6.0 % 1.7 % 0.8 % 14.0 % 8.8 % 1.7 % 4.5 % 0.9 % 3.8 % 2.1 % 10.3 % 15.1 % 5.5 % 1.4 % 1.4 % 5.4 % 29.0 % 10.9 % 5.3 % 0.4 % 0.8 % 14.4 % 5.6 % 20.6 % 1.1 % 1.0 % 1.1 % 1.5 % 1.7 % 1.8 % 1.5 % 1.9 % 11.3 % 1.3 % 2.2 % 2.8 % 6.3 % 4.5 % 6.8 % 1.1 % 15.1 % 2.0 % 2.6 % 4.2 % 9.7 % 4.5 % 8.4 % 16.0 % 0.6 % 17.1 % 1.9 % CALIFORNIA [ continued ] COMP 305.9 % 214.9 % 208.9 % 131.3 % 153.7 % 225.3 % 432.8 % 162.6 % 214.9 % 307.4 % 168.6 % 101.4 % 225.3 % 144.7 % 125.3 % 238.8 % 255.2 % HISPANIC 12.3 % 68.4 % 17.3 % 43.3 % 36.9 % 59.4 % 13.8 % 58.8 % 23.9 % 71.5 % 58.5 % 33.2 % 33.1 % 60.4 % 17.9 % 17.9 % 48.5 % 22.2 % 48.4 % 13.0 % 10.6 % 10.6 % 22.1 % 30.0 % 24.4 % 11.1 % 97.2 % 9.4 % 44.5 % 19.1 % 45.3 % 41.2 % 21.6 % 13.7 % 33.8 % 74.0 % 33.0 % 19.9 % 48.1 % 31.8 % 11.3 % 40.9 % 53.4 % 24.4 % 48.9 % 40.6 % 84.5 % 35.0 % 17.2 % 20.5 % 46.1 % 22.1 % 39.8 % 7.9 % 20.3 % 31.5 % 33.9 % 7.2 % COMP 211.1 % 133.9 % 113.8 % 183.3 % 181.4 % 220.6 % 180.5 % 102.4 % 102.1 % 186.4 % 149.6 % 149.3 % 300.0 % 137.3 % 139.8 % 127.1 % 104.3 % 228.3 % 101.8 % [ continued ] ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC 94590 94596 94804 94806 94941 95020 95023 95060 95076 95121 95123 95126 95127 95205 95207 95336 95348 95350 95376 95405 95422 95503 95660 95661 95687 95695 95814 95816 95820 95973 95991 96002 96093 96145 25.3 % 1.4 % 44.6 % 23.2 % 1.1 % 1.6 % 1.1 % 1.6 % 0.7 % 5.0 % 4.1 % 4.7 % 3.6 % 8.7 % 10.1 % 2.3 % 6.8 % 3.6 % 6.6 % 1.2 % 5.1 % 0.9 % 12.1 % 1.3 % 12.3 % 1.2 % 13.6 % 4.9 % 11.9 % 1.0 % 2.6 % 1.0 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 377.6 % 22.1 % 7.7 % 22.6 % 35.5 % 3.7 % 51.1 % 49.5 % 17.9 % 63.8 % 30.5 % 20.5 % 37.1 % 53.6 % 58.0 % 23.8 % 23.9 % 35.6 % 19.8 % 27.0 % 8.8 % 11.0 % 5.4 % 16.7 % 7.9 % 16.4 % 35.5 % 19.7 % 14.1 % 35.8 % 10.6 % 26.0 % 5.7 % 4.3 % 3.1 % 665.6 % 346.2 % 129.8 % 150.7 % 101.4 % 180.5 % 183.5 % 202.9 % 177.6 % 126.2 % 164.8 % 150.9 % 125.3 % 260.8 % 108.0 % 142.2 % 122.8 % 104.6 % 6 ZIP BLACK 80003 80012 80129 80134 80207 80218 80224 80232 80302 80446 80501 80521 80634 80477 80907 80917 81008 81050 1.0 % 19.0 % 1.2 % 0.9 % 56.3 % 6.6 % 9.5 % 0.9 % 1.1 % 1.3 % 0.5 % 1.3 % 0.7 % 0.1 % 2.3 % 5.3 % 1.4 % 1.1 % 109.5 % 157.7 % 152.7 % 196.9 % 114.5 % 165.4 % 179.0 % 109.8 % 109.5 % 110.4 % Black Population 3.8% Hispanic Population 17.1% COLORADO 148.4 % COMP COMP 500.0 % 1481.5 % 173.6 % 250.0 % 139.4 % HISPANIC 15.0 % 16.9 % 8.4 % 4.8 % 15.4 % 11.4 % 10.5 % 15.6 % 4.7 % 3.8 % 22.7 % 10.8 % 15.8 % 3.1 % 11.3 % 8.8 % 30.5 % 36.5 % COMP 132.7 % 178.3 % 213.4 % COLORADO ZIP [ continued ] HISPANIC COMP ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 1.0 % 0.1 % 43.0 % 8.6 % 251.4 % 40.1 % 17.1 % 5.1 % 22.2 % 13.9 % 5.0 % 7.0 % 4.2 % 4.0 % 7.8 % 67.4 % 12.5 % 15.1 % 6.4 % 238.6 % 101.7 % 11.3 % 15.2 % 17.9 % 22.1 % 1.2 % 9.3 % 27.4 % 2.8 % 5.0 % 26.9 % 1.4 % 0.7 % 18.3 % 8.9 % 10.5 % 12.3 % 122.6 % 151.3 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 33176 33409 33434 33463 33617 33702 33803 33881 33919 34103 34142 34203 34236 34994 BLACK 81101 81201 81303 * 81321 81601 FLORIDA [ continued ] COMP Black Population Hispanic Population CONNECTICUT ZIP BLACK 06040 06052 06082 06110 06112 06226 06239 06320 06360 06451 06475 06484 06511 06604 06708 06790 06810 06902 8.4 % 6.6 % 5.6 % 10.1 % 86.6 % 6.1 % 1.6 % 18.6 % 6.3 % 6.0 % 1.0 % 1.1 % 46.1 % 26.7 % 7.7 % 22.1 % 7.0 % 23.6 % HISPANIC COMP 110.9 % 951.6 % 204.3 % 506.5 % 293.4 % 242.8 % 259.3 % 6.5 % 14.1 % 3.7 % 13.4 % 9.3 % 32.3 % 2.6 % 19.7 % 5.5 % 22.1 % 1.9 % 3.5 % 11.2 % 32.4 % 12.0 % 3.3 % 21.1 % 25.1 % 9.1% 9.4% COMP 150.0 % ZIP BLACK 19711 19801 19901 19971 5.6 % 82.9 % 28.5 % 5.9 % 343.6 % HISPANIC 431.7 % 148.4 % 4.4 % 6.7 % 4.4 % 2.2 % 209.5 % 235.1 % 119.1 % 344.6 % 127.6 % 224.4 % 267.0 % ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC 32207 32250 32304 32601 32805 32817 32960 33024 33145 33161 20.9 % 4.4 % 36.5 % 23.5 % 78.8 % 5.0 % 5.4 % 9.8 % 1.6 % 56.3 % 143.2 % 4.7 % 2.9 % 6.0 % 6.7 % 5.0 % 20.3 % 6.2 % 30.8 % 84.9 % 21.3 % 250.0 % 160.9 % 539.7 % 385.6 % * 401.1 % Black Population 28.7% Hispanic Population 5.3% ZIP BLACK 30043 30062 30303 30901 31405 10.3 % 8.0 % 76.3 % 86.8 % 49.4 % COMP 139.5 % BLACK COMP 8.2 % 7.8 % 3.7 % BLACK COMP 0.2 % 0.5 % 125.0 % COMP ZIP BLACK 60462 60504 60603 60610 60622 60628 60636 0.6 % 7.5 % 2.1 % 27.1 % 10.9 % 94.8 % 97.8 % Statistics for this ZIP code were not available. 7 HISPANIC 8.5 % 4.2 % 1.8% 7.2% COMP 113.8 % 108.3 % 0.4% 7.9% COMP 107.5 % Black Population 15.1% Hispanic Population 12.3% ILLINOIS 183.3 % 505.3 % 126.7 % 101.8 % Black Population Hispanic Population 83301 83703 120.8 % HISPANIC 0.2 % 0.4 % 1.3 % IDAHO ZIP 5.4 % 4.5 % 5.1 % 1.1 % 2.4 % COMP Black Population Hispanic Population 96732 96740 96814 COMP HISPANIC 265.8 % 302.4 % 172.1 % HAWAII Black Population 14.6% Hispanic Population 16.8% FLORIDA 125.3 % GEORGIA Black Population 19.2% Hispanic Population 4.8% COMP 184.2 % 132.1 % 142.5 % ZIP DELAWARE 187.6 % COMP HISPANIC 179.4 % 4.0 % 7.4 % 7.4 % 3.9 % 45.2 % 3.1 % 1.2 % 627.8 % 647.6 % COMP 367.4 % ILLINOIS IOWA [ continued ] ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP ZIP 60651 60660 61350 61554 61603 61701 61820 62226 62401 62526 62703 70.6 % 17.8 % 1.1 % 2.0 % 32.1 % 10.0 % 16.1 % 14.5 % 0.3 % 15.3 % 32.8 % 467.5 % 117.8 % 26.8 % 20.8 % 4.5 % 1.2 % 4.9 % 3.7 % 5.5 % 1.5 % 1.0 % 1.3 % 1.2 % 217.8 % 169.1 % 50322 50501 50588 50613 50801 51106 51301 51501 51566 52001 52246 52353 52402 52601 52627 52632 52641 52722 212.5 % 106.6 % 101.3 % 217.2 % Black Population Hispanic Population INDIANA ZIP BLACK 46123 46208 46227 46229 46250 46268 46312 46324 46360 46383 46408 46410 46516 46545 46580 46804 47150 47170 47203 47250 47274 47304 47374 47403 47421 47711 47807 47905 0.4 % 68.1 % 2.5 % 19.8 % 7.5 % 27.9 % 36.1 % 9.3 % 19.3 % 1.2 % 55.5 % 25.1 % 15.9 % 4.8 % 1.1 % 2.5 % 6.5 % 0.1 % 2.0 % 1.7 % 0.8 % 3.9 % 7.2 % 3.3 % 0.5 % 2.5 % 16.0 % 2.2 % COMP 810.7 % 235.7 % 332.1 % 429.7 % 110.7 % 229.7 % 660.7 % 298.8 % 189.2 % 190.4 % 50014 50023 50138 50208 50311 50315 50315 1.4 % 1.0 % 3.3 % 2.8 % 3.4 % 4.0 % 51.6 % 17.0 % 2.7 % 3.1 % 7.4 % 9.4 % 14.1 % 3.2 % 7.3 % 2.4 % 1.3 % 0.8 % 1.6 % 1.1 % 3.6 % 1.3 % 1.7 % 1.4 % 1.1 % 0.9 % 1.6 % 6.4 % COMP BLACK COMP 2.5 % 0.8 % 0.9 % 1.3 % 9.3 % 3.0 % 3.0 % 119.0 % 442.8 % 142.8 % 142.8 % HISPANIC 2.1 % 1.1 % 0.8 % 1.3 % 6.1 % 6.4 % 6.4 % BLACK 1.7 % 4.4 % 0.4 % 1.5 % 0.3 % 0.9 % 0.2 % 1.3 % 0.1 % 1.4 % 4.7 % 0.5 % 2.9 % 4.5 % 4.0 % 3.4 % 2.3 % 1.5 % COMP 114.2 % 1474.2 % 485.7 % 211.4 % 268.5 % 402.8 % 223.8 % 138.0 % 214.2 % 190.4 % 161.9 % 109.5 % 1.8 % 2.9 % 18.3 % 1.0 % 1.1 % 4.9 % 1.3 % 5.6 % 1.8 % 1.9 % 2.9 % 3.9 % 1.7 % 1.9 % 4.8 % 1.0 % 1.5 % 2.4 % COMP 103.5 % 653.5 % 175.0 % 200.0 % 103.5 % 139.2 % 171.4 % Black Population Hispanic Population 5.7 % 7.0% ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 66211 67214 67601 1.5 % 55.4 % 0.8 % 971.9 % 1.2 % 18.8 % 2.6 % 268.5 % Black Population Hispanic Population KENTUCKY 208.5 % HISPANIC 209.5 % KANSAS ZIP BLACK COMP 40203 40475 40508 62.1 % 5.4 % 31.7 % 850.6 % HISPANIC 434.2 % 1.5 % 1.0 % 3.8 % 7.3% 1.5% COMP 253.3 % 102.8 % Black Population 32.5% Hispanic Population 2.4% LOUISIANA ZIP BLACK COMP 70115 70806 51.0 % 45.1 % 156.9 % 138.7 % HISPANIC 3.2 % 1.4 % COMP 133.3 % 182.8 % Black Population Hispanic Population IOWA ZIP HISPANIC 8.4% 3.5% [ continued ] Black Population Hispanic Population MAINE 2.1% 2.8% ZIP COMP 04005 04073 04086 04101 217.8 % 228.5 % 228.5 % 8 BLACK COMP 0.6 % 0.5 % 1.3 % 4.6 % 120.0 % 260.0 % 920.0 % HISPANIC 0.6 % 1.1 % 1.2 % 2.8 % 0.5% 0.7% COMP 157.1 % 171.4 % 400.0 % Black Population 27.9% Hispanic Population 4.3% MARYLAND ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC 20602 20879 20910 21117 21201 21234 21401 21601 21702 21801 30.8 % 17.2 % 31.6 % 24.9 % 61.7 % 17.0 % 18.2 % 17.9 % 10.2 % 35.4 % 110.3 % 2.7 % 13.1 % 13.5 % 3.0 % 1.9 % 1.5 % 3.0 % 2.5 % 5.1 % 2.7 % 113.2 % 221.1 % 126.8 % MASSACHUSETTS ZIP 01107 01420 01609 01752 01757 02144 02215 48093 48103 48104 48114 48150 48198 48201 48509 48532 48604 48823 48846 48867 48912 49006 49015 49022 49036 49091 49093 49202 49307 49442 49503 49519 * 49686 118.6 % 5.4% 6.8% HISPANIC COMP 8.1 % 3.6 % 6.3 % 2.2 % 1.3 % 4.8 % 3.7 % 150.0 % 75.9 % 15.0 % 15.5 % 6.1 % 4.4 % 3.7 % 7.2 % 1116.1 % 220.5 % 227.9 % 1.5 % 7.3 % 5.2 % 0.4 % 0.7 % 29.5 % 75.1 % 2.9 % 18.4 % 7.2 % 6.0 % 13.7 % 0.2 % 13.3 % 13.5 % 7.4 % 57.1 % 4.5 % 0.9 % 7.0 % 6.3 % 6.5 % 22.9 % 22.2 % 0.3 % 49770 49855 105.8 % Black Population 14.2% Hispanic Population 3.3% COMP 207.7 % 528.8 % 129.5 % 402.1 % 161.2 % 156.3 % HISPANIC 1.0 % 2.5 % 3.6 % 1.0 % 1.9 % 2.5 % 1.9 % 2.3 % 2.1 % 7.8 % 3.0 % 4.1 % 2.3 % 10.7 % 2.6 % 4.1 % 2.6 % 2.9 % 8.6 % 2.2 % 3.1 % 1.5 % 5.5 % 15.3 % [ continued ] BLACK COMP 109.0 % 0.2 % 2.4 % ZIP BLACK 55060 55066 55113 55116 55124 55125 55344 55404 55408 55445 55744 55792 55811 55901 56001 56007 56031 56201 56304 56308 56401 56560 56601 56701 1.3 % 1.2 % 2.8 % 4.6 % 2.0 % 2.7 % 5.3 % 27.9 % 16.1 % 8.9 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 1.5 % 2.5 % 1.6 % 0.3 % 0.4 % 0.8 % 3.6 % 0.2 % 0.4 % 0.7 % 0.4 % 0.2 % COMP 1.0 % 0.7 % Black Population Hispanic Population COMP 131.4 % 151.4 % 797.1 % 460.0 % 254.2 % 102.8 % 3.5% 2.9% HISPANIC COMP 4.0 % 1.2 % 2.0 % 4.8 % 2.0 % 2.2 % 3.1 % 15.6 % 15.5 % 1.5 % 0.6 % 0.8 % 1.1 % 2.3 % 2.0 % 8.4 % 2.7 % 13.5 % 1.5 % 0.6 % 0.8 % 4.2 % 0.9 % 1.3 % 137.9 % 165.5 % 106.8 % 537.9 % 534.4 % 289.6 % 465.5 % 144.8 % Black Population 36.3% Hispanic Population 1.4% MISSISSIPPI 236.3 % HISPANIC COMP MINNESOTA COMP BLACK ZIP 304.6 % 131.9 % BLACK MICHIGAN ZIP COMP Black Population Hispanic Population 116.6 % MICHIGAN ZIP BLACK COMP 39401 49.6 % 136.6 % HISPANIC COMP 1.3 % 124.2 % Black Population 11.2% Hispanic Population 2.1% MISSOURI 324.2 % 124.2 % 260.6 % 166.6 % 463.6 % 1.6 % ZIP BLACK COMP 63033 63088 63108 63108 63118 63376 64030 64050 64093 64110 43.4 % 3.5 % 44.8 % 44.8 % 52.7 % 2.4 % 33.5 % 2.7 % 5.1 % 55.9 % 387.5 % * Statistics for this ZIP code were not available. 9 400.0 % 400.0 % 470.5 % 299.1 % 499.1 % HISPANIC 1.2 % 2.3 % 1.9 % 1.9 % 3.7 % 1.5 % 4.3 % 4.0 % 2.2 % 3.4 % COMP 109.5 % 176.1 % 204.7 % 190.4 % 104.7 % 161.9 % MISSOURI ZIP BLACK 64119 64801 65049 65109 65203 65401 65807 1.9 % 2.6 % 0.1 % 6.7 % 10.3 % 1.9 % 3.1 % COMP ZIP 59102 59105 59254 59254 59255 59323 59327 59401 59422 59442 59601 59802 BLACK 0.3 % 0.4 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.7 % 0.1 % 1.0 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 68134 68137 68506 68510 COMP HISPANIC 133.3 % 233.3 % 333.3 % 2.3 % 2.6 % 1.1 % 1.1 % 1.0 % 3.0 % 1.3 % 2.7 % 1.2 % 0.6 % 1.6 % 1.8 % BLACK COMP 7.4 % 1.2 % 1.2 % 2.8 % 185.0 % HISPANIC BLACK COMP HISPANIC 180.9 % 109.5 % 07018 07042 07060 07102 07105 07201 07442 07505 07601 07631 07702 07728 07730 07860 07960 08010 08031 08103 08401 08608 08628 08690 08822 08835 08861 08865 08884 08901 90.9 % 43.5 % 34.6 % 65.5 % 5.6 % 33.4 % 1.6 % 40.9 % 24.6 % 39.0 % 0.5 % 6.9 % 1.1 % 1.6 % 10.4 % 23.3 % 1.7 % 69.8 % 44.2 % 52.1 % 17.7 % 1.3 % 1.3 % 0.5 % 9.7 % 2.2 % 1.5 % 23.0 % 668.3 % 319.8 % 254.4 % 481.6 % 4.1 % 5.7 % 29.9 % 22.8 % 35.2 % 44.5 % 5.7 % 46.9 % 25.9 % 21.8 % 1.9 % 9.9 % 5.8 % 2.5 % 13.7 % 6.1 % 3.9 % 26.4 % 24.9 % 32.9 % 4.8 % 2.3 % 3.7 % 5.4 % 67.7 % 3.7 % 4.4 % 39.0 % 109.5 % 0.3% 2.0% COMP 115.0 % 130.0 % 150.0 % 135.0 % 4.0% 5.5% COMP HISPANIC 89032 89102 89121 89502 89503 26.7 % 7.5 % 6.4 % 2.5 % 1.8 % 392.6 % 110.2 % 17.6 % 38.0 % 18.9 % 33.6 % 9.9 % NEW HAMPSHIRE ZIP 87108 87108 87112 87124 87401 87505 COMP 192.8 % COMP 0.9 % 1.9 % 0.4 % 0.3 % 1.1 % 0.5 % 128.5 % 271.4 % 157.1 % HISPANIC 1.9 % 2.8 % 0.8 % 0.5 % 2.6 % 0.9 % 171.3 % 513.2 % 325.0 % 383.0 % 130.1 % 169.1 % 0.7% 1.7% COMP 111.7 % 164.7 % 152.9 % 10 COMP 224.8 % 171.4 % 264.6 % 334.5 % 352.6 % 194.7 % 163.9 % 103.0 % 198.4 % 187.2 % 247.3 % 509.0 % 293.2 % Black Population 1.9% Hispanic Population 42.1% BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 4.4 % 4.4 % 2.8 % 2.6 % 0.8 % 0.7 % 231.5 % 231.5 % 147.3 % 136.8 % 45.5 % 45.5 % 27.5 % 28.2 % 18.8 % 52.5 % 108.0 % 108.0 % ZIP BLACK 10012 10301 10451 10509 10550 10607 10701 10801 10924 10940 10977 11201 2.9 % 23.9 % 46.1 % 2.1 % 69.3 % 32.5 % 28.6 % 27.7 % 6.1 % 11.9 % 33.4 % 20.7 % 124.7 % Black Population 15.9% Hispanic Population 15.1% NEW YORK 170.5 % Black Population Hispanic Population BLACK 300.7 % 180.8 % 286.7 % NEW MEXICO Black Population 6.8% Hispanic Population 19.7% BLACK 245.5 % COMP 2.5 % 2.7 % 1.8 % 3.4 % ZIP 03038 03104 03431 03743 03784 03833 ZIP Black Population Hispanic Population NEVADA ZIP COMP Black Population Hispanic Population NEBRASKA ZIP HISPANIC 3.8 % 2.3 % 1.2 % 1.5 % 2.0 % 1.4 % 2.3 % MONTANA Black Population 13.6% Hispanic Population 13.3% NEW JERSEY [ continued ] COMP 150.3 % 289.9 % 435.8 % 204.4 % 179.8 % 174.2 % 210.0 % 130.1 % HISPANIC 7.5 % 18.3 % 55.0 % 7.9 % 11.6 % 12.6 % 34.3 % 27.8 % 7.1 % 19.7 % 11.4 % 14.4 % COMP 121.1 % 364.2 % 227.1 % 184.1 % 130.4 % NEW YORK NORTH CAROLINA [ continued ] ZIP BLACK 11542 11550 11743 11758 11772 11787 11795 11901 11930 12010 12043 12065 12095 12180 12206 12307 12401 12534 12550 12601 12701 12801 12832 12866 12883 12901 12953 12983 13210 13350 13367 13421 13440 13502 13601 13617 13669 13815 13820 13838 13856 13901 14020 14120 14214 14224 14301 14304 14424 14605 14626 14830 14843 14850 14891 14901 6.2 % 50.9 % 6.4 % 4.5 % 5.1 % 0.7 % 0.3 % 20.4 % 1.5 % 1.6 % 1.7 % 1.5 % 4.7 % 9.7 % 48.0 % 43.2 % 9.3 % 12.1 % 21.6 % 26.6 % 20.2 % 1.3 % 0.4 % 2.6 % 0.5 % 1.9 % 17.1 % 0.6 % 22.1 % 1.0 % 0.5 % 0.7 % 6.1 % 8.1 % 5.2 % 2.5 % 6.9 % 1.0 % 4.0 % 0.8 % 0.4 % 4.9 % 4.1 % 0.4 % 37.5 % 0.5 % 19.4 % 2.4 % 1.0 % 59.1 % 3.1 % 2.4 % 1.7 % 4.6 % 0.7 % 16.7 % COMP 320.1 % 128.3 % 301.8 % 271.6 % 135.8 % 167.2 % 127.0 % 107.5 % 138.9 % 235.8 % 122.0 % 371.6 % 105.0 % HISPANIC COMP ZIP BLACK 19.4 % 31.0 % 4.8 % 4.5 % 14.0 % 3.4 % 3.4 % 9.0 % 5.0 % 11.0 % 2.2 % 1.7 % 3.1 % 3.6 % 6.7 % 13.2 % 5.1 % 4.9 % 24.2 % 8.6 % 16.9 % 1.4 % 0.5 % 1.7 % 0.4 % 1.7 % 10.3 % 0.9 % 4.4 % 1.2 % 0.7 % 0.8 % 3.9 % 3.8 % 3.6 % 1.3 % 4.4 % 1.0 % 3.2 % 1.5 % 1.1 % 2.1 % 1.9 % 1.0 % 2.8 % 0.8 % 2.7 % 1.0 % 1.1 % 31.7 % 2.5 % 0.7 % 1.1 % 3.9 % 0.7 % 3.9 % 128.4 % 205.2 % 27103 27408 27514 27603 27704 28205 28303 28401 28801 17.5 % 6.7 % 9.2 % 21.5 % 52.0 % 39.8 % 37.2 % 51.6 % 44.8 % Black Population 21.6% Hispanic Population 4.7% COMP HISPANIC COMP 174.4 % 240.7 % 184.2 % 172.2 % 238.8 % 207.4 % 8.2 % 1.4 % 3.3 % 8.4 % 4.9 % 12.6 % 7.0 % 2.7 % 2.5 % 178.7 % 104.2 % 268.0 % 148.9 % Black Population Hispanic Population NORTH DAKOTA 0.6% 1.2% [ There are no Planned Parenthood facilities in this state. ] Black Population 11.5% Hispanic Population 1.9% OHIO 160.2 % 111.9 % 209.9 % 11 ZIP BLACK 43015 43113 43201 43213 43222 43528 43604 44052 44103 44109 44116 44139 44146 44240 44256 44266 44302 44410 44507 44691 44709 44833 44906 45011 45044 45219 45238 45245 45246 45324 45402 45504 45701 3.4 % 1.8 % 20.9 % 24.4 % 13.1 % 7.1 % 39.7 % 19.1 % 79.1 % 7.0 % 0.4 % 6.1 % 38.8 % 6.0 % 1.6 % 3.2 % 41.8 % 0.9 % 62.1 % 2.5 % 5.4 % 0.2 % 5.7 % 8.9 % 11.6 % 42.3 % 5.1 % 0.8 % 23.6 % 6.7 % 38.4 % 3.5 % 3.2 % COMP 181.7 % 212.1 % 113.9 % 345.2 % 166.0 % 687.8 % 337.3 % 363.4 % 540.0 % 100.8 % 367.8 % 205.2 % 333.9 % HISPANIC 1.0 % 0.7 % 2.8 % 3.3 % 2.2 % 2.7 % 10.7 % 16.8 % 4.3 % 19.7 % 1.2 % 0.7 % 1.3 % 0.9 % 0.9 % 0.7 % 1.9 % 0.6 % 6.3 % 0.8 % 0.9 % 0.8 % 1.2 % 2.7 % 1.1 % 1.5 % 0.7 % 0.9 % 4.4 % 1.7 % 1.9 % 0.9 % 1.3 % COMP 147.3 % 173.6 % 115.7 % 142.1 % 563.1 % 884.2 % 226.3 % 1036.8 % 331.5 % 142.1 % 231.5 % Black Population Hispanic Population OKLAHOMA ZIP BLACK 73013 73069 73103 73110 73139 74012 74105 74107 74120 6.2 % 3.2 % 20.0 % 19.7 % 5.5 % 4.1 % 7.6 % 9.5 % 8.1 % COMP HISPANIC 263.1 % 259.2 % 125.0 % 106.5 % 2.4 % 4.9 % 5.2 % 4.4 % 11.0 % 4.0 % 5.0 % 4.3 % 10.9 % 211.5 % 209.6 % 1.6% 8.0% ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 97005 97015 97030 97030 97128 97206 97212 97305 97401 97402 97424 97439 97477 97501 97520 97526 97701 2.0 % 1.2 % 1.9 % 1.9 % 0.6 % 1.7 % 14.1 % 1.0 % 1.5 % 1.2 % 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.8 % 0.5 % 0.6 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 125.0 % 21.5 % 4.0 % 10.2 % 10.2 % 13.4 % 6.5 % 4.2 % 20.4 % 3.9 % 7.2 % 3.9 % 2.2 % 7.6 % 12.5 % 3.4 % 4.7 % 3.7 % 268.7 % 118.7 % 118.7 % 106.2 % 881.2 % BLACK 15017 15108 15222 15501 15601 15901 16801 17013 17102 17202 17325 17331 17356 17401 17602 18045 18101 18360 18503 18701 4.2 % 4.6 % 24.8 % 1.1 % 1.9 % 21.8 % 2.9 % 3.4 % 46.2 % 7.6 % 2.8 % 0.5 % 0.5 % 21.5 % 11.5 % 2.3 % 19.9 % 4.2 % 8.7 % 5.3 % 127.5 % 127.5 % 167.5 % 255.0 % COMP 248.0 % 218.0 % 462.0 % 215.0 % 115.0 % 199.0 % HISPANIC 0.8 % 0.9 % 1.1 % 0.5 % 0.6 % 2.0 % 2.3 % 1.4 % 6.0 % 6.4 % 4.1 % 1.4 % 1.0 % 14.2 % 24.3 % 2.3 % 45.7 % 4.7 % 3.0 % 2.3 % ZIP BLACK 18901 18951 18974 19002 19007 19020 19050 19063 19087 19107 19107 19152 19154 19311 19320 19382 19401 19426 19464 19602 1.7 % 0.9 % 2.9 % 5.7 % 14.7 % 5.9 % 43.9 % 6.0 % 2.8 % 11.8 % 11.8 % 4.1 % 5.6 % 5.3 % 22.8 % 6.4 % 29.9 % 9.9 % 10.9 % 11.0 % [ continued ] HISPANIC COMP 147.0 % 439.0 % 118.0 % 118.0 % 228.0 % 299.0 % 109.0 % 110.0 % 1.5 % 1.6 % 4.1 % 1.3 % 8.9 % 4.5 % 1.2 % 1.1 % 1.6 % 3.8 % 3.8 % 4.8 % 3.2 % 24.6 % 4.5 % 2.5 % 8.9 % 2.4 % 3.0 % 43.0 % COMP 278.1 % 140.6 % 118.7 % 118.7 % 150.0 % 768.7 % 140.6 % 278.1 % 1343.7 % Black Population Hispanic Population RHODE ISLAND 4.5% 8.7% ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 02903 12.4 % 275.5 % 15.2 % 174.7 % 156.2 % SOUTH CAROLINA Black Population 10.0% Hispanic Population 3.2% PENNSYLVANIA ZIP PENNSYLVANIA COMP Black Population Hispanic Population OREGON 7.6% 5.2% ZIP BLACK COMP 29204 29403 60.9 % 68.8 % 206.4 % 233.2 % COMP ZIP 57106 57702 BLACK COMP 0.9 % 0.4 % 150.0 % 1428.1 % 146.8 % 12 COMP 1.6 % 1.5 % HISPANIC 0.6% 1.4% COMP 1.3 % 1.4 % Black Population 16.4% Hispanic Population 2.2% TENNESSEE 443.7 % 759.3 % HISPANIC Black Population Hispanic Population SOUTH DAKOTA 187.5 % 200.0 % 128.1 % Black Population 29.5% Hispanic Population 2.4% ZIP BLACK COMP 37203 37914 38112 53.4 % 41.2 % 56.4 % 325.6 % 251.2 % 343.9 % HISPANIC 3.2 % 0.9 % 3.0 % COMP 145.4 % 136.3 % Black Population 11.5% Hispanic Population 32.0% TEXAS ZIP BLACK 75041 75062 75067 75069 75074 75074 75090 75110 75150 75150 75160 75165 75231 75231 75237 75254 75460 75701 75904 76010 76015 76021 76028 76104 76114 76116 76119 76205 76240 76642 76661 76701 76706 76901 77023 77037 77068 77081 77340 77471 77477 77539 77802 78201 78212 78217 78223 78227 78237 78238 78332 78363 78501 78521 78521 78539 78539 78550 10.7 % 9.6 % 7.9 % 9.5 % 8.1 % 8.1 % 12.8 % 19.4 % 10.4 % 10.4 % 24.0 % 13.3 % 27.2 % 27.2 % 88.6 % 9.8 % 23.3 % 21.1 % 18.8 % 16.0 % 10.1 % 3.5 % 0.7 % 57.2 % 3.3 % 10.4 % 55.5 % 7.9 % 4.3 % 17.9 % 41.5 % 27.7 % 13.1 % 3.2 % 1.8 % 3.0 % 13.0 % 9.0 % 18.7 % 7.4 % 16.6 % 10.7 % 6.1 % 1.9 % 2.5 % 9.3 % 4.3 % 7.9 % 2.8 % 4.7 % 0.7 % 3.9 % 0.5 % 0.3 % 0.3 % 1.4 % 1.4 % 0.9 % COMP 111.3 % 168.6 % 208.6 % 115.6 % 236.5 % 236.5 % 770.4 % 202.6 % 183.4 % 163.4 % 139.1 % 497.3 % 155.6 % 482.6 % 360.8 % 240.8 % 113.9 % 113.0 % 162.6 % 144.3 % TEXAS [ continued ] HISPANIC COMP ZIP BLACK 39.0 % 26.9 % 16.5 % 28.5 % 27.4 % 27.4 % 15.4 % 19.0 % 16.1 % 16.1 % 14.5 % 18.8 % 40.5 % 40.5 % 7.3 % 40.4 % 4.1 % 10.5 % 11.9 % 39.7 % 11.7 % 6.7 % 5.5 % 26.2 % 27.9 % 18.6 % 23.2 % 11.5 % 12.4 % 14.2 % 16.4 % 22.8 % 28.1 % 26.5 % 86.0 % 64.0 % 13.6 % 71.3 % 13.3 % 53.1 % 27.2 % 22.5 % 11.0 % 82.0 % 61.0 % 31.1 % 67.3 % 63.7 % 94.5 % 59.9 % 79.5 % 66.2 % 84.0 % 93.4 % 93.4 % 89.7 % 89.7 % 74.3 % 121.8 % 78572 78579 78580 78582 78589 78596 78702 78704 78758 79412 79603 79701 79761 0.3 % 0.0 % 3.0 % 0.2 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 23.7 % 4.9 % 11.5 % 10.5 % 9.9 % 12.1 % 8.7 % 126.5 % 126.5 % 126.2 % COMP HISPANIC COMP 206.0 % 88.4 % 98.6 % 85.9 % 97.4 % 95.4 % 88.3 % 67.7 % 34.0 % 32.1 % 42.9 % 35.5 % 50.2 % 46.9 % 276.2 % 308.1 % 268.4 % 304.3 % 298.1 % 275.9 % 211.5 % 106.2 % 100.3 % 134.0 % 110.9 % 156.8 % 146.5 % 105.2 % Black Population Hispanic Population UTAH ZIP BLACK 84057 84060 84095 84102 84102 84119 84321 84403 84770 124.0 % 0.4 % 0.4 % 0.3 % 1.8 % 1.8 % 1.6 % 0.5 % 1.4 % 0.3 % COMP HISPANIC COMP 117.7 % 221.1 % 225.0 % 225.0 % 200.0 % 10.6 % 19.9 % 3.3 % 11.9 % 11.9 % 21.3 % 7.8 % 14.6 % 8.4 % 175.0 % BLACK COMP 0.6 % 0.8 % 1.8 % 0.3 % 0.5 % 0.3 % 0.4 % 0.4 % 0.9 % 0.6 % 120.0 % 160.0 % 360.0 % 05201 05301 05401 05478 05495 05641 05655 05701 05753 05855 268.7 % 200.0 % 222.8 % 165.9 % 256.2 % 190.6 % 210.3 % 199.0 % 295.3 % 187.1 % 248.4 % 206.8 % 262.5 % 291.8 % 291.8 % 280.3 % 280.3 % 232.1 % HISPANIC 180.0 % 120.0 % 162.2 % 1.0 % 1.4 % 1.4 % 0.7 % 1.0 % 1.6 % 0.8 % 0.8 % 1.9 % 1.1 % 0.5% 0.9% COMP 111.1 % 155.5 % 155.5 % 111.1 % 177.7 % 211.1 % 122.2 % Black Population 19.6% Hispanic Population 4.7% VIRGINIA 13 132.2 % 132.2 % 236.6 % Black Population Hispanic Population VERMONT ZIP 0.8% 9.0% ZIP BLACK 22046 22901 23221 23462 23666 24017 24060 3.3 % 11.6 % 13.1 % 31.6 % 43.9 % 66.4 % 3.9 % COMP 161.2 % 223.9 % 338.7 % HISPANIC COMP 10.8 % 3.1 % 1.6 % 4.5 % 3.0 % 1.2 % 2.1 % 229.7 % Black Population Hispanic Population WASHINGTON 3.2% 7.5% ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP ZIP BLACK 98003 98007 98027 98028 98031 98036 98105 98122 98126 98133 98201 98225 98250 98271 98273 98277 98310 98331 98362 98373 98382 98383 98405 98501 98531 98584 98662 98686 98902 98926 98944 99163 99206 99207 99207 99301 99336 99362 8.8 % 2.9 % 0.8 % 1.3 % 7.4 % 2.6 % 2.0 % 25.0 % 7.3 % 4.2 % 3.5 % 0.9 % 0.3 % 0.5 % 0.6 % 4.2 % 5.2 % 1.4 % 0.4 % 2.4 % 0.2 % 2.9 % 21.7 % 1.1 % 0.3 % 1.5 % 1.9 % 1.0 % 1.6 % 0.8 % 0.4 % 2.3 % 0.9 % 2.5 % 2.5 % 2.7 % 1.2 % 2.1 % 275.0 % 8.6 % 9.8 % 3.4 % 3.6 % 6.1 % 6.4 % 3.7 % 6.9 % 6.1 % 5.2 % 6.6 % 4.4 % 2.8 % 4.2 % 23.3 % 5.7 % 4.5 % 12.8 % 2.0 % 3.9 % 2.3 % 4.1 % 6.0 % 3.8 % 9.0 % 6.0 % 4.2 % 4.6 % 28.8 % 5.4 % 66.6 % 3.7 % 2.7 % 3.4 % 3.4 % 47.9 % 18.6 % 16.0 % 114.6 % 130.6 % 53038 53081 53090 53115 53142 53186 53202 53204 53212 53216 53227 53233 53403 53704 53713 53901 53916 54166 54220 54301 54494 54703 54729 54902 54911 54913 54935 0.2 % 0.9 % 0.2 % 0.9 % 2.4 % 1.0 % 8.8 % 8.2 % 63.0 % 75.7 % 2.1 % 34.4 % 28.6 % 7.0 % 17.3 % 2.8 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 0.5 % 3.9 % 0.3 % 0.6 % 0.2 % 0.6 % 1.1 % 0.4 % 1.6 % 231.2 % 781.2 % 228.1 % 131.2 % 678.1 % ZIP 26105 BLACK 1.0 % 310.6 % 170.6 % 120.0 % COMP HISPANIC COMP HISPANIC 154.3 % 143.8 % 1105.2 % 1328.0 % 603.5 % 501.7 % 122.8 % 303.5 % 2.9 % 6.4 % 1.6 % 14.4 % 4.9 % 9.6 % 3.4 % 64.8 % 10.3 % 2.2 % 3.2 % 5.2 % 15.4 % 4.7 % 15.1 % 2.6 % 3.9 % 1.3 % 2.2 % 5.2 % 0.9 % 0.9 % 0.6 % 1.6 % 2.2 % 0.8 % 2.6 % 5.7% 3.6% COMP 177.7 % 400.0 % 136.1 % 266.6 % 1800.0 % 286.1 % 144.4 % 427.7 % 130.5 % 419.4 % 108.3 % 144.4 % 384.0 % Black Population Hispanic Population WYOMING 888.0 % ZIP 82604 638.6 % 248.0 % 213.3 % Black Population Hispanic Population WEST VIRGINIA Black Population Hispanic Population WISCONSIN BLACK COMP 0.4 % COMP 0.6 % 14 COMP 3.3 % WASHINGTON, DC 3.2% 0.7% HISPANIC 0.8% 6.4% Black Population 60.0% Hispanic Population 7.9% ZIP BLACK COMP 20019 20036 97.7 % 5.2 % 162.8 % HISPANIC 0.9 % 7.4 % COMP CHART 2 – INDEPENDENT ABORTION CLINIC LOCATIONS Black Population 26.0% Hispanic Population 1.7% ALABAMA ZIP BLACK COMP 35205 35404 35801 36109 40.0 % 35.7 % 9.7 % 7.4 % 153.8 % 137.3 % BLACK COMP 9.0 % 0.6 % 257.1 % 99508 99611 85006 85016 85018 85021 85712 ZIP BLACK 152.9 % 90292 90504 90505 90806 91203 91205 91304 91304 91331 91335 91345 91356 91403 91405 91744 91763 91770 91911 91911 91911 92024 92025 92078 92103 92105 92115 92117 92123 92126 92234 92408 92505 92701 92701 92701 92868 93065 93301 93701 94110 94110 94115 94115 94520 94538 94541 94566 94607 94610 94954 95116 95204 4.3 % 3.5 % 1.6 % 20.5 % 1.8 % 1.4 % 4.5 % 4.5 % 5.3 % 4.2 % 4.2 % 3.8 % 3.6 % 6.0 % 2.1 % 6.2 % 0.6 % 4.5 % 4.5 % 4.5 % 0.5 % 2.1 % 2.0 % 2.5 % 15.1 % 10.9 % 1.9 % 9.2 % 2.9 % 2.7 % 14.4 % 6.0 % 1.4 % 1.4 % 1.4 % 2.7 % 1.2 % 11.3 % 6.9 % 4.2 % 4.2 % 17.8 % 17.8 % 4.5 % 3.6 % 12.9 % 1.1 % 50.8 % 23.9 % 1.3 % 2.9 % 4.1 % HISPANIC 7.6 % 2.9 % 3.5% 4.1% COMP 185.3 % Black Population 3.1% Hispanic Population 25.3% ARIZONA ZIP 2.6 % 1.7 % 1.2 % 1.1 % COMP Black Population Hispanic Population ALASKA ZIP HISPANIC CALIFORNIA BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 4.0 % 3.8 % 2.6 % 3.8 % 4.0 % 129.0 % 73.3 % 29.2 % 16.0 % 25.6 % 19.3 % 289.7 % 129.0 % Black Population 15.7% Hispanic Population 3.2% ARKANSAS ZIP BLACK 72211 14.2 % COMP ZIP BLACK 5.1 % 12.8 % 78.5 % 8.5 % 3.1 % 1.5 % 15.1 % 15.1 % 5.5 % 5.5 % 5.5 % 5.5 % 1.9 % 1.9 % 2.8 % 0.7 % HISPANIC COMP 2.6 % Black Population 6.7% Hispanic Population 32.4% CALIFORNIA 90005 90007 90008 90010 90025 90033 90034 90034 90057 90057 90057 90057 90211 90211 90241 90255 101.1 % COMP 191.0 % 1171.6 % 126.8 % 225.3 % 225.3 % HISPANIC COMP 58.3 % 58.2 % 14.3 % 19.6 % 15.9 % 92.3 % 29.2 % 29.2 % 70.2 % 70.2 % 70.2 % 70.2 % 4.5 % 4.5 % 57.7 % 95.6 % 179.9 % 179.6 % 284.8 % 216.6 % 216.6 % 216.6 % 216.6 % 178.0 % 295.0 % 15 [ continued ] COMP 305.9 % 225.3 % 162.6 % 137.3 % 214.9 % 168.6 % 102.9 % 265.6 % 265.6 % 192.5 % 758.2 % 356.7 % HISPANIC 6.0 % 17.3 % 8.7 % 43.4 % 21.4 % 28.5 % 34.0 % 34.0 % 82.6 % 41.9 % 53.7 % 13.1 % 9.0 % 58.8 % 81.3 % 60.3 % 42.1 % 60.4 % 60.4 % 60.4 % 14.9 % 48.5 % 13.5 % 12.7 % 48.4 % 24.4 % 16.0 % 14.4 % 9.3 % 49.3 % 44.5 % 45.3 % 88.5 % 88.5 % 88.5 % 45.1 % 17.9 % 31.8 % 64.6 % 46.1 % 46.1 % 5.5 % 5.5 % 39.8 % 19.3 % 35.4 % 7.8 % 12.6 % 6.9 % 15.8 % 64.5 % 26.6 % COMP 133.9 % 104.9 % 104.9 % 254.9 % 129.3 % 165.7 % 181.4 % 250.9 % 186.1 % 129.9 % 186.4 % 186.4 % 186.4 % 149.6 % 149.3 % 152.1 % 137.3 % 139.8 % 273.1 % 273.1 % 273.1 % 139.1 % 199.3 % 142.2 % 142.2 % 122.8 % 109.2 % 199.0 % CALIFORNIA ZIP FLORIDA [ continued ] BLACK COMP HISPANIC 9.2 % 9.2 % 1.7 % 1.0 % 3.0 % 1.1 % 0.6 % 1.8 % 137.3 % 137.3 % 16.4 % 16.4 % 13.5 % 5.7 % 15.9 % 7.0 % 15.8 % 8.7 % 95825 95825 95928 96002 95355 95409 95437 95819 COMP Black Population 3.8% Hispanic Population 17.1% COLORADO ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC 80014 80111 80113 80113 80206 80210 80218 80220 80220 80246 80301 80304 81501 81611 81621 81657 8.2 % 1.6 % 3.8 % 3.8 % 6.7 % 1.6 % 6.6 % 15.6 % 15.6 % 7.4 % 1.6 % 0.8 % 0.9 % 0.6 % 0.3 % 0.4 % 215.7 % 6.8 % 5.4 % 1.0 % 1.0 % 7.9 % 6.7 % 11.4 % 16.7 % 16.7 % 21.4 % 8.7 % 9.7 % 13.7 % 5.7 % 22.8 % 7.9 % 176.3 % 173.6 % 410.5 % 410.5 % 194.7 % COMP 125.1 % 133.3 % Black Population Hispanic Population CONNECTICUT 9.1% 9.4% ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 06106 06120 06606 06810 16.9 % 59.3 % 28.5 % 7.0 % 185.7 % 651.6 % 313.1 % 57.8 % 37.9 % 21.8 % 21.1 % 614.8 % 403.1 % 231.9 % 224.4 % Black Population 19.2% Hispanic Population 4.8% DELAWARE ZIP BLACK COMP 19802 19901 75.4 % 28.5 % 392.7 % 148.4 % HISPANIC COMP 3.2 % 4.4 % Black Population 14.6% Hispanic Population 16.8% FLORIDA ZIP BLACK COMP 32114 32117 32216 32216 46.3 % 24.4 % 19.6 % 19.6 % 317.1 % 167.1 % 134.2 % 134.2 % HISPANIC COMP 3.4 % 3.9 % 5.5 % 5.5 % 16 [ continued ] ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC 32216 32301 32504 32504 32601 32609 32701 32803 32806 32812 33012 33012 33013 33013 33015 33021 33023 33065 33133 33134 33135 33135 33136 33143 33150 33155 33162 33162 33162 33166 33173 33183 33308 33311 33313 33313 33314 33317 33321 33321 33324 33334 33407 33606 33609 33612 33613 33710 33713 33756 33761 33813 33901 33903 33952 34239 34475 34950 19.6 % 47.1 % 12.1 % 12.1 % 23.5 % 39.9 % 15.7 % 5.1 % 5.3 % 6.5 % 1.6 % 1.6 % 1.5 % 1.5 % 18.1 % 7.0 % 45.1 % 13.3 % 16.4 % 0.9 % 2.3 % 2.3 % 61.9 % 12.0 % 71.1 % 1.1 % 48.6 % 48.6 % 48.6 % 5.4 % 2.2 % 2.8 % 0.9 % 81.3 % 67.9 % 67.9 % 5.4 % 20.1 % 7.4 % 7.4 % 6.7 % 12.3 % 60.6 % 11.4 % 7.0 % 29.0 % 19.1 % 1.6 % 9.4 % 6.5 % 0.8 % 4.3 % 22.1 % 1.5 % 5.2 % 0.9 % 53.3 % 56.2 % 134.2 % 322.6 % 5.5 % 3.5 % 2.7 % 2.7 % 6.7 % 4.1 % 14.2 % 8.4 % 9.7 % 21.1 % 90.0 % 90.0 % 90.3 % 90.3 % 62.0 % 17.8 % 24.1 % 18.9 % 44.9 % 69.1 % 92.9 % 92.9 % 28.2 % 42.9 % 18.6 % 75.8 % 25.6 % 25.6 % 25.6 % 62.1 % 64.6 % 73.9 % 6.4 % 3.5 % 7.9 % 7.9 % 22.2 % 17.5 % 14.4 % 14.4 % 14.2 % 21.5 % 9.3 % 7.8 % 21.4 % 17.9 % 17.1 % 4.4 % 6.1 % 8.2 % 3.8 % 5.1 % 10.4 % 4.8 % 5.5 % 5.2 % 4.5 % 18.1 % 160.9 % 273.2 % 107.5 % 123.9 % 308.9 % 112.3 % 423.9 % 486.9 % 332.8 % 332.8 % 332.8 % 556.8 % 465.0 % 465.0 % 137.6 % 415.0 % 198.6 % 130.8 % 151.3 % 365.0 % 384.9 % COMP 125.5 % 535.7 % 535.7 % 537.5 % 537.5 % 369.0 % 105.9 % 143.4 % 112.5 % 267.2 % 411.3 % 552.9 % 552.9 % 167.8 % 255.3 % 110.7 % 451.1 % 152.3 % 152.3 % 152.3 % 369.6 % 384.5 % 439.8 % 132.1 % 104.1 % 127.9 % 127.3 % 106.5 % 101.7 % 107.7 % Black Population 28.7% Hispanic Population 5.3% GEORGIA ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC 30035 30067 30076 30324 30324 30329 30341 30341 30342 30349 30907 31401 31904 89.4 % 26.0 % 9.1 % 9.9 % 9.9 % 16.2 % 9.9 % 9.9 % 7.3 % 87.4 % 10.5 % 65.8 % 20.3 % 311.4 % 1.7 % 10.4 % 15.7 % 19.3 % 19.3 % 24.4 % 31.7 % 31.7 % 17.6 % 2.4 % 2.5 % 1.4 % 0.5 % 304.5 % 229.2 % COMP 196.2 % 296.2 % 364.1 % 364.1 % 460.3 % 598.1 % 598.1 % 332.2 % ZIP COMP 0.6 % 150.0 % 83702 HISPANIC 1.8% 7.2% ZIP BLACK 60016 60016 60018 60137 60191 60516 60521 60612 60616 60619 60630 60637 60646 60647 60647 60661 61104 61614 61820 62040 2.7 % 2.7 % 1.0 % 2.1 % 0.5 % 2.5 % 3.1 % 65.6 % 38.6 % 98.1 % 0.5 % 82.2 % 0.4 % 6.8 % 6.8 % 21.5 % 14.0 % 5.6 % 16.1 % 2.6 % COMP 434.4 % 255.6 % 649.6 % 544.3 % 142.3 % 106.6 % 10.5 % 10.5 % 24.1 % 4.5 % 13.4 % 4.3 % 3.2 % 14.0 % 9.1 % 0.7 % 16.4 % 1.3 % 6.6 % 67.7 % 67.7 % 5.9 % 16.1 % 1.4 % 5.5 % 2.4 % COMP ZIP BLACK COMP 46219 11.4 % 135.7 % HISPANIC 457.1 % 660.7 % 7.4 % 2.8 % 7.4 % 2.2 % 2.3 % COMP 211.4 % 211.4 % Black Population Hispanic Population BLACK COMP 2.3 % 109.5 % HISPANIC 2.1% 2.8% COMP 2.1 % Black Population Hispanic Population 5.7% 7.0% ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 66101 66211 40.6 % 1.5 % 712.2 % 30.4 % 1.2 % 434.2 % Black Population Hispanic Population KENTUCKY ZIP BLACK COMP 40202 40503 66.8 % 2.7 % 915.0 % COMP 195.9 % 108.9 % 113.8 % ZIP BLACK 70002 70115 70115 70122 70806 71104 71111 6.0 % 51.0 % 51.0 % 73.2 % 45.1 % 27.1 % 23.9 % HISPANIC 2.1 % 2.5 % 7.3% 1.5% COMP 140.0 % 166.6 % Black Population 32.5% Hispanic Population 2.4% LOUISIANA COMP 156.9 % 156.9 % 225.2 % 138.7 % HISPANIC COMP 10.8 % 3.2 % 3.2 % 3.2 % 1.4 % 2.6 % 3.2 % 450.0 % 133.3 % 133.3 % 133.3 % 108.3 % 133.3 % 133.3 % 550.4 % 550.4 % MAINE 130.8 % 04106 04330 04401 Black Population Hispanic Population INDIANA 38.4 % 4.0 % 55.5 % 4.5 % 4.9 % HISPANIC 0.4% 7.9% 3.6 % HISPANIC 46222 46241 46408 46635 46815 KANSAS Black Population 15.1% Hispanic Population 12.3% ILLINOIS COMP 52245 Black Population Hispanic Population BLACK BLACK IOWA [ There are no independent facilities in this state. ] IDAHO [ continued ] ZIP ZIP Black Population Hispanic Population HAWAII INDIANA ZIP Black Population Hispanic Population BLACK COMP 0.6 % 0.4 % 0.8 % 120.0 % 160.0 % COMP 2.4 % 17 1.1 % 0.8 % 0.9 % COMP 157.1 % 114.2 % 128.5 % Black Population 27.9% Hispanic Population 4.3% MARYLAND 8.4% 3.5% HISPANIC 0.5% 0.7% ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 20710 20740 70.9 % 15.5 % 254.1 % 12.9 % 5.6 % 300.0 % 130.2 % MARYLAND ZIP BLACK 20740 20746 20747 20783 20785 20814 20850 20874 20877 20877 21117 21228 21236 21237 21740 15.5 % 87.1 % 89.9 % 39.3 % 84.0 % 3.4 % 10.1 % 17.0 % 17.7 % 17.7 % 24.9 % 17.6 % 6.0 % 16.3 % 11.0 % COMP 312.1 % 322.2 % 140.8 % 301.0 % MASSACHUSETTS ZIP 01778 01830 01904 01960 02446 02446 02446 02703 MICHIGAN [ continued ] BLACK HISPANIC COMP ZIP BLACK 5.6 % 2.4 % 1.3 % 40.6 % 3.1 % 6.1 % 8.4 % 9.0 % 27.4 % 27.4 % 3.0 % 1.9 % 1.7 % 2.1 % 1.5 % 130.2 % 48906 48917 49120 49442 49503 49508 13.1 % 8.9 % 6.3 % 22.9 % 22.2 % 13.1 % 944.1 % 141.8 % 195.3 % 209.3 % 637.2 % 637.2 % Black Population Hispanic Population COMP HISPANIC 0.7 % 2.8 % 3.2 % 1.0 % 2.4 % 2.4 % 2.4 % 1.6 % [ continued ] 1.1 % 9.2 % 4.8 % 3.4 % 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.3 % COMP 161.2 % 156.3 % 12.7 % 4.9 % 2.4 % 5.5 % 15.3 % 4.8 % 384.8 % 148.4 % 166.6 % 463.6 % 145.4 % 3.5% 2.9% ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 55101 55402 55404 55404 55422 55802 14.6 % 36.4 % 27.9 % 27.9 % 4.8 % 1.9 % 417.1 % 1040.0 % 797.1 % 797.1 % 137.1 % 9.8 % 2.8 % 15.6 % 15.6 % 2.0 % 0.9 % 337.9 % COMP ZIP BLACK 39216 35.3 % 537.9 % 537.9 % Black Population 36.3% Hispanic Population 1.4% MISSISSIPPI 135.2 % COMP Black Population Hispanic Population MINNESOTA 5.4% 6.8% HISPANIC COMP HISPANIC COMP 0.5 % Black Population 11.2% Hispanic Population 2.1% MISSOURI [ There are no independent facilities in this state. ] Black Population 14.2% Hispanic Population 3.3% MICHIGAN ZIP BLACK 48025 48075 48076 48093 48108 48126 48152 48185 48205 48219 48224 48235 48302 48310 48310 48312 48322 48346 48504 48603 3.8 % 70.7 % 42.1 % 1.5 % 16.8 % 1.4 % 1.4 % 6.2 % 84.4 % 85.0 % 79.2 % 96.3 % 6.0 % 1.2 % 1.2 % 1.7 % 6.5 % 1.1 % 66.7 % 5.4 % COMP 497.8 % 296.4 % 118.3 % 594.3 % 598.5 % 557.7 % 678.1 % 469.7 % HISPANIC 1.2 % 1.0 % 1.1 % 1.0 % 4.0 % 3.1 % 1.8 % 2.5 % 0.8 % 1.0 % 1.1 % 0.6 % 1.3 % 1.2 % 1.2 % 1.2 % 1.4 % 2.9 % 2.0 % 4.2 % COMP Black Population Hispanic Population MONTANA ZIP 59047 59802 59901 121.2 % BLACK COMP 0.3 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 68005 Black Population Hispanic Population BLACK COMP 6.3 % 157.5 % 89030 89074 * 127.2 % COMP 5.1 % BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 18.9 % 277.9 % 62.9 % 319.2 % * Statistics for this ZIP code were not available. 18 HISPANIC 4.0% 5.5% Black Population 6.8% Hispanic Population 19.7% NEVADA ZIP COMP 1.9 % 1.8 % 1.4 % NEBRASKA ZIP HISPANIC 0.3% 2.0% NEVADA ZIP 89104 89119 89169 * 89502 BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP ZIP BLACK 6.7 % 8.3 % 122.0 % 34.8 % 31.7 % 176.6 % 160.9 % 33.6 % 170.5 % 10001 10003 10013 10016 10017 10017 10017 10022 10023 10024 10128 10451 10455 10455 10457 10458 10461 10461 10605 10710 10950 11030 11101 11201 11201 11201 11232 11234 11237 11354 11364 11372 11372 11372 11372 11372 11373 11374 11375 11375 11417 11746 11787 11788 13057 13057 13851* 14214 14228 14618 14620 14620 9.8 % 4.4 % 4.8 % 5.2 % 3.4 % 3.4 % 3.4 % 1.2 % 5.5 % 5.9 % 4.9 % 46.1 % 27.6 % 27.6 % 36.2 % 23.2 % 4.9 % 4.9 % 7.7 % 10.9 % 1.7 % 1.2 % 25.2 % 20.7 % 20.7 % 20.7 % 6.0 % 38.8 % 10.1 % 4.4 % 2.0 % 2.9 % 2.9 % 2.9 % 2.9 % 2.9 % 2.0 % 2.6 % 2.5 % 2.5 % 4.1 % 6.8 % 0.7 % 1.3 % 1.2 % 1.2 % 2.5 % NEW HAMPSHIRE ZIP 03103 03301 03840 Black Population Hispanic Population BLACK COMP 2.5 % 1.2 % 0.3 % 357.1 % 171.4 % HISPANIC 6.9 % 1.5 % 0.7 % ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC 07018 07024 07042 07052 07060 07083 07087 07095 07208 07306 07601 07631 07631 07631 07652 07657 07731 08002 08034 08043 08201 08540 08755 08816 08865 08873 90.9 % 1.7 % 43.5 % 17.4 % 34.6 % 15.5 % 3.6 % 8.1 % 19.0 % 15.9 % 24.6 % 39.0 % 39.0 % 39.0 % 1.1 % 0.8 % 3.7 % 5.5 % 3.8 % 8.0 % 11.3 % 4.8 % 2.7 % 2.8 % 2.2 % 28.3 % 668.3 % 4.1 % 7.9 % 5.7 % 10.0 % 29.9 % 9.3 % 75.3 % 9.8 % 42.7 % 29.0 % 25.9 % 21.8 % 21.8 % 21.8 % 4.9 % 13.8 % 5.7 % 3.5 % 2.7 % 2.5 % 6.3 % 4.3 % 4.3 % 4.2 % 3.7 % 8.8 % 319.8 % 127.9 % 254.4 % 113.9 % 139.7 % 116.9 % 180.8 % 286.7 % 286.7 % 286.7 % 208.3 % 87102 87102 87505 88008 COMP 405.8 % COMP 224.8 % 566.1 % 321.0 % 218.0 % 194.7 % 163.9 % 163.9 % 163.9 % 103.7 % Black Population 1.9% Hispanic Population 42.1% NEW MEXICO ZIP 0.7% 1.7% Black Population 13.6% Hispanic Population 13.3% NEW JERSEY Black Population 15.9% Hispanic Population 15.1% NEW YORK [ continued ] BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 4.2 % 4.2 % 0.7 % 1.0 % 221.0 % 221.0 % 68.8 % 68.8 % 52.5 % 73.6 % 163.4 % 163.4 % 124.7 % 174.8 % 37.5 % 5.7 % 2.3 % 14.1 % 14.1 % * Statistics for this ZIP code were not available. 19 COMP 289.9 % 173.5 % 173.5 % 227.6 % 145.9 % 158.4 % 130.1 % 130.1 % 130.1 % 244.0 % 235.8 % HISPANIC COMP 20.1 % 7.6 % 4.7 % 7.9 % 5.4 % 5.4 % 5.4 % 4.8 % 8.3 % 11.1 % 8.7 % 55.0 % 74.7 % 74.7 % 61.9 % 58.8 % 26.0 % 26.0 % 11.9 % 11.2 % 5.5 % 3.4 % 35.7 % 14.4 % 14.4 % 14.4 % 64.0 % 7.0 % 79.6 % 18.9 % 7.7 % 56.4 % 56.4 % 56.4 % 56.4 % 56.4 % 43.1 % 13.1 % 10.2 % 10.2 % 28.1 % 12.7 % 3.4 % 4.7 % 1.0 % 1.0 % 133.1 % 2.8 % 1.8 % 1.7 % 5.1 % 5.1 % 364.2 % 494.7 % 494.7 % 409.9 % 389.4 % 172.1 % 172.1 % 236.4 % 423.8 % 527.1 % 125.1 % 373.5 % 373.5 % 373.5 % 373.5 % 373.5 % 285.4 % 186.0 % NORTH CAROLINA ZIP BLACK 27262 27406 27407 27514 27606 27607 27609 28211 28211 28273 28306 28546 28801 21.1 % 53.1 % 25.2 % 9.2 % 13.3 % 11.0 % 14.9 % 12.1 % 12.1 % 28.5 % 24.6 % 24.5 % 44.8 % COMP HISPANIC 245.8 % 116.6 % 131.9 % 113.8 % 113.4 % 207.4 % BLACK COMP 0.8 % 133.3 % 58102 6.7 % 2.4 % 6.9 % 3.3 % 6.5 % 4.6 % 9.2 % 3.3 % 3.3 % 6.0 % 4.5 % 7.6 % 2.5 % HISPANIC 1.3 % ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC 43205 43214 43231 43604 43612 44109 44120 44304 45241 45324 45429 81.6 % 2.9 % 18.8 % 39.7 % 5.6 % 7.0 % 76.3 % 30.4 % 3.6 % 6.7 % 1.0 % 709.5 % 1.5 % 1.2 % 2.9 % 10.7 % 4.4 % 19.7 % 1.1 % 2.3 % 1.1 % 1.7 % 1.0 % 163.4 % 345.2 % 663.4 % 264.3 % ZIP BLACK COMP 73069 73132 74135 3.2 % 13.8 % 6.6 % 181.5 % 15206 15206 15222 17110 18104 18109 * 19013 19106 19141 146.8 % 138.2 % 195.7 % HISPANIC 4.9 % 5.7 % 5.7 % BLACK 0.4 % 5.3 % 1.6 % 1.5 % COMP 331.2 % BLACK COMP 51.2 % 51.2 % 24.8 % 35.5 % 1.6 % 512.0 % 512.0 % 248.0 % 355.0 % 1.5 % 1.5 % 1.1 % 3.8 % 2.7 % 75.8 % 6.3 % 83.3 % 758.0 % 5.2 % 2.9 % 2.5 % HISPANIC 833.0 % COMP 118.7 % 162.5 % 127.6 % 161.7 % Black Population Hispanic Population RHODE ISLAND 0.6% 1.2% ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 18.5 % 411.1 % 26.5 % 304.5 % SOUTH CAROLINA 108.3 % 4.5% 8.7% 02905 COMP Black Population 29.5% Hispanic Population 2.4% ZIP BLACK COMP 29407 29605 30.7 % 46.0 % 104.0 % 155.9 % HISPANIC COMP 1.6 % 2.3 % COMP Black Population Hispanic Population SOUTH DAKOTA 152.6 % 563.1 % 231.5 % 1036.8 % COMP 109.6 % 109.6 % 15.4 % 5.1 % 3.0 % 3.9 % 192.5 % ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC COMP 37211 37620 37643 37916 37919 38104 38104 18.7 % 2.3 % 1.1 % 7.4 % 4.3 % 27.5 % 27.5 % 114.0 % 10.0 % 0.6 % 0.9 % 1.4 % 1.9 % 3.4 % 3.4 % 454.5 % 167.6 % 167.6 % ZIP BLACK 75205 75231 75235 75243 76108 76110 76542 1.6 % 27.2 % 9.9 % 33.9 % 4.3 % 4.8 % 25.8 % * Statistics for this ZIP code were not available. 20 154.5 % 154.5 % Black Population 11.5% Hispanic Population 32.0% TEXAS 1.6% 8.0% COMP Black Population 16.4% Hispanic Population 2.2% TENNESSEE 7.6% 5.2% HISPANIC 0.6% 1.4% [ There are no independent facilities in this state. ] 121.0 % Black Population Hispanic Population OREGON 97116 97205 97210 97401 142.5 % Black Population Hispanic Population OKLAHOMA ZIP ZIP Black Population 11.5% Hispanic Population 1.9% OHIO Black Population 10.0% Hispanic Population 3.2% PENNSYLVANIA COMP Black Population Hispanic Population NORTH DAKOTA ZIP Black Population 21.6% Hispanic Population 4.7% COMP 236.5 % 294.7 % 224.3 % HISPANIC 6.2 % 40.5 % 70.3 % 14.4 % 12.6 % 62.8 % 14.8 % COMP 126.5 % 219.6 % 196.2 % TEXAS VIRGINIA [ continued ] ZIP BLACK COMP HISPANIC 77002 77004 77008 77026 77057 77074 77074 77076 77090 77098 77401 77707 78212 78212 78222 78238 78240 78240 78404 78501 78550 78704 78750 78753 79902 79902 40.6 % 72.4 % 4.2 % 67.6 % 4.7 % 20.4 % 20.4 % 8.0 % 17.5 % 2.2 % 1.0 % 23.9 % 2.5 % 2.5 % 22.4 % 4.7 % 5.3 % 5.3 % 1.9 % 0.5 % 0.9 % 4.9 % 2.8 % 18.7 % 1.5 % 1.5 % 353.0 % 629.5 % 22.0 % 11.8 % 43.2 % 31.1 % 22.6 % 43.2 % 43.2 % 72.3 % 18.4 % 17.8 % 7.9 % 7.2 % 61.0 % 61.0 % 44.0 % 59.9 % 42.5 % 42.5 % 64.6 % 84.0 % 74.3 % 34.0 % 9.8 % 38.5 % 76.1 % 76.1 % 587.8 % 177.3 % 177.3 % 152.1 % 207.8 % 194.7 % 162.6 % ZIP COMP ZIP BLACK COMP 135.0 % 23452 23502 23518 23601 24016 17.9 % 48.2 % 23.8 % 25.1 % 45.4 % 245.9 % 121.4 % 128.0 % 231.6 % 135.0 % 135.0 % 225.9 % BLACK COMP HISPANIC 1.1 % 3.4 % 0.5 % 137.5 % 425.0 % 8.9 % 23.1 % 3.6 % 84107 84111 84124 BLACK COMP 10.5 % 20.0 % 1.9 % 25.0 % 25.0 % 21.7 % 11.2 % 328.1 % 625.0 % 0.8% 9.0% ZIP BLACK COMP 25302 25304 13.3 % 6.5 % 415.6 % 203.1 % ZIP 53202 54301 54303 256.6 % 0.5% 0.9% ZIP 83001 COMP 8.8 % 3.9 % 1.7 % 154.3 % BLACK 0.5 % 1.0 % HISPANIC 3.4 % 5.2 % 3.6 % 142.8 % COMP HISPANIC 8.1 % 5.7% 3.6% COMP 144.4 % Black Population Hispanic Population 0.2 % 3.2% 0.7% COMP Black Population Hispanic Population WYOMING [ There are no independent facilities in this state. ] 5.1 % 7.2 % 3.0 % 6.9 % 6.9 % 6.0 % 6.9 % HISPANIC BLACK 3.2% 7.5% COMP Black Population Hispanic Population WISCONSIN COMP COMP 4.3 % 3.2 % 4.1 % 2.9 % 2.4 % HISPANIC 781.2 % 781.2 % 678.1 % 350.0 % WEST VIRGINIA 120.3 % 237.8 % 237.8 % Black Population Hispanic Population VERMONT 98057 * 98101 98104 98115 98122 98122 98405 98418 190.6 % 190.6 % 137.5 % 187.1 % 132.8 % 132.8 % 201.8 % 262.5 % 232.1 % 106.2 % HISPANIC Black Population Hispanic Population WASHINGTON ZIP Black Population Hispanic Population UTAH [ continued ] 0.8% 6.4% COMP 126.5 % Black Population 19.6% Hispanic Population 4.7% VIRGINIA ZIP BLACK 20110 22030 22031 22046 22304 22314 22901 23220 23229 12.4 % 7.5 % 5.5 % 3.3 % 24.4 % 22.4 % 11.6 % 44.6 % 5.0 % COMP 124.4 % 114.2 % 227.5 % HISPANIC COMP 14.2 % 9.7 % 13.8 % 10.8 % 15.0 % 5.1 % 3.1 % 1.9 % 1.9 % 302.1 % 206.3 % 293.6 % 229.7 % 319.1 % 108.5 % WASHINGTON, DC ZIP BLACK COMP 20020 20032 20037 96.5 % 97.0 % 7.1 % 160.8 % 161.6 % * Statistics for this ZIP code were not available. 21 Black Population 60.0% Hispanic Population 7.9% HISPANIC 0.9 % 0.8 % 5.6 % COMP Analysis & Conclusion What we now know – and have documented – is that there is not one state in the union without population control centers located in ZIP codes with higher percentages of blacks and/or Hispanics than the state’s overall percentage. In fact, Hawaii is the only state that does not have facilities located in ZIP codes exceeding 125% of their overall percentage. It is important to remember that every time there is a figure in the “COMP” column, that figure represents a population control facility in a ZIP code that is disproportionately black, disproportionately Hispanic or, in many cases, both. The fact is that even a cursory scan of those columns takes the allegations of racial targeting made in Maafa 21 and transforms them into an observable and undeniable reality. Not only is this racial targeting widespread, it’s scale is often enormous. We found 42 states with family planning facilities in ZIP codes where the black and/or Hispanic populations exceeds 200% of the state’s overall percentage. More telling is that these percentages routinely go far beyond even this level. Numerous states have facilities in ZIP codes that range from 250% to well over 1,000% and it is not uncommon for them to have facilities located in many such ZIP codes. The numbers are staggering. As just one example, consider Texas which has 94 Zip codes with at least one population control facility. Of those, only 22 are not disproportionately black and/or Hispanic. As the charts demonstrate, similar patterns are found across the country and they do not vary appreciably by the size of the state. In Connecticut – a state thoroughly dissimilar from Texas in size, culture and geography – there are 21 Zip codes in which population control facilities are located and only six are not disproportionately black and/or Hispanic. In the end, this data speaks for itself and does not require a lot of analysis. The numbers make it clear that the African-American and Hispanic communities have been targeted and logic makes it clear that this did not happen coincidentally or unintentionally. It should also be noted that this eugenics effort is being funded with taxpayer money. Currently, Planned Parenthood alone receives approximately one million dollars a day from the federal government plus an unknown amount in state and local funds. Moreover, this has been going on for decades. It is also important to note the number of times there are multiple facilities in disproportionately minority ZIP codes. For example, in New Jersey, ZIP code 07631 has a black population 286.7% of the state’s overall percentage and a Hispanic population 163.9% of the state. That ZIP code alone has four population control facilities. Similarly, Minnesota ZIP code 55404 has a black population that is 797.1% of the overall state percentage and a Hispanic population 537.9% of the state. In that ZIP code there are three population control centers. For years, there have been those within the American political system who have taken action to address the disproportionate treatment of minorities. Earlier, this issue was raised in the context of alcohol and tobacco marketing but, make no mistake, it exists in many other parts of our culture as well. Again, this pattern is repeated in state after state. We identified 116 ZIP codes with more than one population control facility. Of those, 84 were disproportionately black and/or Hispanic. What this means is that, when the American family planning industry places multiple facilities in a ZIP code, that ZIP code is more than two-and-a-half times as likely to be disproportionately minority as not. Now, this report validates the revelations contained in Maafa 21 to create a new challenge. The question becomes whether the political leaders who have so righteously spoken out against these other injustices, will remain silent in the face of this one. Should that be their decision, they will surrender their credibility and lose the right to ever again be outraged. 22 Maafa 21 Information This 2-hour and 17-minute documentary is available on DVD for $20 including shipping. To place an order, call toll-free or go online. 1 | 800 | 800-5433 Maafa21.com This website also features a short trailer of the film plus comments from previous viewers. For additional information, call 940 | 380-8800 Copyright 2011 Life Dynamics Incorporated Post Office Box 2226 Denton, Texas 76202 940 | 380-8800 This report was funded by the supporters of Life Dynamics Incorporated. Life Dynamics Incorporated is a 501(c)(3) corporation and donations may be tax deductible.