Transcript
Racial Targeting and Population Control
By Mark Crutcher | President, Life Dynamics Incorporated
Carole Novielli | Researcher
Renee Hobbs | Production Assistant
Abstract
In the summer of 2009, Life Dynamics released the
documentary film, Maafa 21. Its basic contention is
that terms like “population control” and “family
planning” are code words for a genocidal effort
aimed at minorities – primarily African-Americans.
Among the many revelations documented in this film
is that, as far back as the mid 1900s, some wellknown eugenicists were arguing that the most
effective way they could advance their agenda would
be to concentrate population control facilities within
the targeted communities. Perhaps the most noted
proponent of this concept was Gunnar Myrdal who
discussed it in his 1944 book, An American Dilemma:
The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy.
In Maafa 21, evidence is presented that Planned
Parenthood and others within the abortion and family
planning lobby took this approach when choosing
locations for their facilities and that this practice
continues to this day.
The film also cites a study conducted by three
American university researchers into the criteria used
to decide the placement of U.S. polulation control
facilities.
Their finding was that the primary
consideration in making this determination is not
poverty but the percentage of blacks in the area.
The initial response to this documentary from people
defending these organizations was to claim that they
focus their facilities on minority neighborhoods
because that is where the need is.
Almost
immediately, however, they saw that this argument
was creating a problem for them. Simply put, it is
incompatible with one of their other arguments.
For years, these people have consistently argued
that the most effective way to reduce the number of
abortions is to prevent unplanned pregnancies by
making birth control chemicals, devices and
information widely available. If that is true, in light of
their concession that they have focused these things
on the minority community, the obvious result should
be that black women have the lowest pregnancy and
abortion rates in the country.
But to the contrary, in contemporary America, the
rate of pregnancy among black women is almost
three times as high as it is for white women and,
though they make up less than 13% of the female
population, black women have about 37% of the
abortions. In other words, the family planning
lobby’s argument that they concentrate their facilities
in minority communities because that is where the
need is, cannot be reconciled with their long
espoused claim about the connection between
contraception, pregnancy and abortion.
Seeing that they had painted themselves into this
corner, their options were to either abandon the
assertion that contraception is the way to reduce
abortion rates, or reverse field and start denying that
their facilities are disproportionately placed into
minority neighborhoods.
They chose the latter.
Virtually overnight, they went from claiming that they
target minority communities with noble intentions to
claiming that they don’t target them at all. Then, to
support this revised strategy, they began quoting a
new report by the Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI)
showing that only one in 10 Planned Parenthood
clinics is located in a minority community.
Next, the media began publishing articles citing
these stats in which AGI was routinely characterized
as an independent entity. This was obviously done
to give the stats an aura of credibility. It was also
done despite the fact that the American media is fully
aware that AGI is not an independent agency but is,
instead, the research arm of Planned Parenthood
and receives funding from Planned Parenthood. In
fact, Alan Guttmacher was once the president of
Planned Parenthood and vice-president of the
American Eugenics Society.
these predominately black ZIP codes. The problem
is that, according to the formula used in the AGI
study, not one of these Planned Parenthood facilities
would show up in their report as being located in the
black community despite the reality that 83% of
them were located there.
Clearly, AGI was “cooking the books.” They knew
Planned Parenthood’s denial of racial targeting could
not be sustained as long as certain large segments of
their facilities were included in their statistics. So
AGI cobbled together this absurd formula to make
those facilities become statistically invisible.
In this process, the media consistently quoted AGI’s
stats at face value without questioning their accuracy
or the methods by which they were derived.
Methodology
The reality is, the research in AGI’s report had been
manipulated to yield pre-determined results. For
example, only facilities that actually perform
abortions were included. However, every Planned
Parenthood facility in America either does abortions
or refers for them, and in the chain of events that lead
to an abortion each entity is equally responsible.
Historically, the population control movement’s
eugenic efforts have been primarily focused on the
African-American community and that was the
underlying theme of Maafa 21. In our research,
however, we have seen unmistakable evidence that
the family planning establishment is also ratcheting
up its efforts to deal with the Hispanic population.
It should also be pointed out that, in Maafa 21, the
charge is that the genocide in question is being
carried out with both abortion and birth control.
Given that every Planned Parenthood facility
provides one or both, AGI had no legitimate rationale
for excluding any of them from its data.
For that reason, this report was expanded to include
them as well. Our mission was to document whether
the population control movement has targeted black
and/or Hispanic communities by placing facilities in
areas where those minority populations are
disproportionately represented.
In a transparent effort to narrow the field even more,
AGI also chose to only include facilities that perform
over 400 abortions per year. Again, this was an
arbitrary and inexplicable decision given that no
commonly accepted principle or industry standard
establishes that a facility doing 400 abortions is
statistically relevant while one that does 399 is not.
We began by creating a database of the ZIP codes
for every Planned Parenthood facility in the United
States. This list was generated from Planned
Parenthood’s website. We then used United States
Census Bureau figures to establish the percentage of
black and Hispanic people residing within each of
these ZIP codes as well as within each state.
To appreciate the deception being perpetrated here,
imagine a hypothetical scenario in which 10 of the 12
Planned Parenthood facilities in a state are located in
predominately black ZIP codes. Two of those 10
facilities perform fewer than 400 abortions per year
each. The remaining eight do not do abortions but
refer their clients to abortion clinics located outside
The resulting data allowed us to calculate how often
these ZIP codes contain a higher proportion of
blacks and/or Hispanics than the state in which they
are located. Of equal importantance is that this data
also gave us the size of those disparities. The results
of those calculations are given in a chart found later
in this report.
2
Within the American population control movement,
Planned Parenthood is not the only player. Their
efforts are augmented by hundreds of independent
abortion clinics.
These facilities are found
nationwide and are generally affiliated with trade
associations like the National Abortion Federation or
the National Coalition of Abortion Providers.
from that sample. We did not do that and, instead,
included every facility in the country. This eliminated
any claim that we used “selective inclusion or
selective exclusion” to control the results.
It should also be noted that all of our raw data came
from the United States Census Bureau and is, thus,
insulated against bias. The only limitation this source
presented is that there is a lag time between when
the government takes a census and when that
information is compiled, analyzed and released to
the public. For that reason, the latest information
available to us was from the 2000 census. Although
we would have preferred newer data, as a practical
matter, the racial makeup of ZIP codes where these
facilities are located would not change enough from
one census to the next to have any material impact
on our results.
For this report, a second database was created of
these facilities with their locations being subjected to
the same “racial targeting” evaluation as the Planned
Parenthood locations. Those results are in a second
chart. (Since some Planned Parenthood facilities are
also members of the National Abortion Federation or
the National Coalition of Abortion Providers, we took
measures to make certain that these two charts were
purged of duplicates.)
Accuracy
The bottom line is, if there are errors, correcting them
would be as likely to reinforce our findings as refute
them. Additionally, in either case, they would be
neither numerous enough nor large enough to
substantially alter the overall findings.
Any study of this nature includes several factors that
can lead to errors. ZIP codes change; facilities
close; new facilities open; facilities move to new
locations; facilities change their names; some
operate under multiple names and/or addresses,
etcetera. It is also true that, in the highly unstable
world of abortion clinics and population control
facilities, these problems are even more pronounced.
The Charts
The first chart identifies the locations of Planned
Parenthood population control facilities. Even
though Planned Parenthood operates the largest
chain of abortion clinics in the United States, it is not
the case that every facility included here does
abortions. However, among those that do not, every
one refers for abortion, schedules abortions, or
otherwise arranges abortions. In addition, each
facility provides contraceptive drugs and/or devices.
Considering the high number of potential mistakecausing areas, we made certain that once our data
was gathered and calculated, it was checked,
rechecked and checked again.
One aspect of this study is that, due to the high
volume of entries and calculations necessary to
create these charts – approximately 3000 – it would
take a lot of errors to significantly alter the overall
results. Fortunately, the system we employed made
sure that errors simply don’t exist in those numbers.
As stated earlier, the second chart is for independent
abortion clinics that are not affiliated with Planned
Parenthood. In both charts, every state’s name is
followed by their overall percentage of black and
Hispanic populations. The “ZIP” column contains
the ZIP codes in which population control facilities
are located in that state. If a ZIP code is listed
multiple times, it means there were that many
facilities in that ZIP code.
Another factor supporting the study’s accuracy is the
fact that it was universal. It is common and accepted
practice for those conducting this kind of research to
examine a “representative sample” of the whole and
then issue an analysis based on data extrapolated
3
The “BLACK” column gives the percentage of
African-Americans who live in this ZIP code and the
“COMP” column compares this percentage against
the state’s overall percentage of African-Americans.
When the “COMP” column is blank, it means that
this ZIP code did not exceed the state’s percentage
of black population. The last two columns provide
the same data for the Hispanic population.
As an example of how these charts work, the state of
Florida shows to have a black population of 14.6%.
In that state, Planned Parenthood has a facility in ZIP
code 33617 which has a black population of 27.4%.
This means that this facility is located in a ZIP code
with an African-American population that is 187.6%
that of the state.
In reviewing this data, there are several things to
keep in mind. The first is that the issue is not
whether a ZIP code is predominately black or
Hispanic but whether it is disproportionately black or
Hispanic. Second, any infrequent or small gaps
between the percentage of minorities in a ZIP code
and the percentage of minorities in the
corresponding state can be dismissed as
“statistically meaningless.”
But when those gaps are common enough or large
enough that they cannot be rationally attributed to
random chance, they constitute a pattern that could
have only been created by design and intention.
The question then becomes: at what point does a
gap stop being insignificant and start being
significant? Given the subjective nature of that
question, the deciding principle has to be common
sense. If a ZIP code’s percentage of black or
Hispanic population is 102% of the state’s
percentage, no reasonable person would consider
that an indicator of racial targeting.
However, when a state has multiple population
control facilities in ZIP codes with minority
populations that exceed 125% of the state’s overall
minority population, common sense says that racial
targeting is the plausible explanation.
As the charts in this report will show, such a pattern
is readily identifiable in the locations of America’s
family planning and population control facilities. It
should also be pointed out that these patterns are
routinely considered indicative of racial targeting
when it comes to other issues.
For example, African-Americans suffer far more of
the health problems associated with tobacco use
than does the white population. Civil rights leaders
have long contended that this is a direct result of the
fact that large tobacco companies target a
disproportionate percentage of their advertising and
promotional efforts on the black community. In just
one of many examples of this, research conducted
relative to a lawsuit in Baltimore, Maryland,
documented that 76% of the billboards in black
neighborhoods featured tobacco advertising while
that number was only 20% in white neighborhoods.
A parallel situation has also been identified with
alcohol.
The catastrophic social and health
problems associated with alcoholism are found in
the black community to a much higher extent than
they are in the white community. And again, black
leaders have spent years pointing out that a primary
cause of this is the fact that liquor merchandisers
place a disproportionate percentage of their retail
outlets in black neighborhoods. The visual evidence
of this can be seen, first hand, by driving through
predominately minority neighborhoods in almost any
decent-sized city in America.
It is also claimed that the alcohol content of some
beverages marketed in these areas is measurably
higher than the alcohol content of similar products
sold elsewhere, and that certain cheap high-alcoholcontent products are sold only in liquor stores and
convenience stores in black neighborhoods.
There are many other examples of this sort of racial
targeting. Moreover, the disastrous effects it has had
on the targeted communities are easy to see.
The encouraging thing is that, in recent years, some
of the corporations responsible for this have been
4
dragged into the public spotlight by the news media.
A few have even found themselves in lawsuits and
Congressional hearings.
the minority community than these corporations,
they have been left free to push their eugenics
agenda without scrutiny.
The glaring exception is America’s family planning
industry. Despite having more potential to destroy
As the following charts show, when it comes to racial
targeting, these people are not amateurs.
CHART 1 – PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOCATIONS
NOTE: In this chart as well as the one that follows, some ZIP codes show a
percentage of minorities that exceeds 100%. This occured because a small
number of Hispanics identify themselves as both black and Hispanic and are,
therefore, counted twice by the Census Bureau. This phenomenon is rare
and was identified in fewer than 10 of the ZIP codes included in this study.
Black Population 26.0%
Hispanic Population 1.7%
ALABAMA
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
35205
36609
40.0 %
28.4 %
153.8 %
109.2 %
BLACK
COMP
9.0 %
0.3 %
7.8 %
0.8 %
0.3 %
257.1 %
99508
99669
99701
99801
99835
85031
85032
85204
85224
85251
85281
85304
85338
85364
HISPANIC
222.8 %
ZIP
152.9 %
123.5 %
85705
85712
85713
86001
86305
7.6 %
2.2 %
4.4 %
3.4 %
3.3 %
3.5%
4.1%
[ continued ]
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
3.5 %
4.0 %
6.2 %
1.7 %
0.3 %
112.9 %
129.0 %
200.0 %
32.4 %
19.3 %
62.1 %
12.2 %
5.3 %
128.0 %
COMP
107.3 %
254.4 %
Black Population 15.7%
Hispanic Population 3.2%
ARKANSAS
185.3 %
Black Population 3.1%
Hispanic Population 25.3%
ARIZONA
ZIP
2.6 %
2.1 %
COMP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
ALASKA
ZIP
HISPANIC
ARIZONA
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
72204
72703
69.1 %
4.1 %
440.1 %
HISPANIC
3.1 %
4.1 %
COMP
128.1 %
Black Population 6.7%
Hispanic Population 32.4%
CALIFORNIA
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
4.9 %
1.7 %
2.4 %
3.5 %
1.6 %
3.0 %
2.8 %
3.5 %
2.7 %
158.0 %
62.8 %
19.1 %
30.0 %
15.1 %
13.5 %
25.2 %
12.1 %
19.8 %
55.1 %
248.2 %
90003
90007
90016
90022
90029
90033
90033
90041
90260
32.2 %
12.8 %
47.9 %
0.5 %
2.8 %
1.5 %
1.5 %
2.3 %
11.5 %
480.5 %
191.0 %
714.9 %
66.4 %
58.2 %
44.2 %
96.3 %
61.0 %
92.3 %
92.3 %
38.6 %
50.0 %
204.9 %
179.6 %
136.4 %
297.2 %
188.2 %
284.8 %
284.8 %
119.1 %
154.3 %
112.9 %
112.9 %
118.5 %
217.7 %
5
171.6 %
CALIFORNIA
ZIP
BLACK
90401
90602
90713
90806
91104
91303
91320
91405
91506
91732
91767
91786
91801
91911
92008
92021
92025
92101
92105
92108
92109
92109
92111
92114
92115
92126
92236
92270
92408
92506
92553
92627
92683
92691
92705
92805
92866
93003
93101
93301
93401
93454
93637
93710
93728
93901
93927
93955
94040
94086
94110
94509
94520
94530
94533
94559
94565
94583
4.2 %
1.3 %
3.1 %
20.5 %
14.4 %
4.0 %
1.2 %
6.0 %
1.7 %
0.8 %
14.0 %
8.8 %
1.7 %
4.5 %
0.9 %
3.8 %
2.1 %
10.3 %
15.1 %
5.5 %
1.4 %
1.4 %
5.4 %
29.0 %
10.9 %
5.3 %
0.4 %
0.8 %
14.4 %
5.6 %
20.6 %
1.1 %
1.0 %
1.1 %
1.5 %
1.7 %
1.8 %
1.5 %
1.9 %
11.3 %
1.3 %
2.2 %
2.8 %
6.3 %
4.5 %
6.8 %
1.1 %
15.1 %
2.0 %
2.6 %
4.2 %
9.7 %
4.5 %
8.4 %
16.0 %
0.6 %
17.1 %
1.9 %
CALIFORNIA
[ continued ]
COMP
305.9 %
214.9 %
208.9 %
131.3 %
153.7 %
225.3 %
432.8 %
162.6 %
214.9 %
307.4 %
168.6 %
101.4 %
225.3 %
144.7 %
125.3 %
238.8 %
255.2 %
HISPANIC
12.3 %
68.4 %
17.3 %
43.3 %
36.9 %
59.4 %
13.8 %
58.8 %
23.9 %
71.5 %
58.5 %
33.2 %
33.1 %
60.4 %
17.9 %
17.9 %
48.5 %
22.2 %
48.4 %
13.0 %
10.6 %
10.6 %
22.1 %
30.0 %
24.4 %
11.1 %
97.2 %
9.4 %
44.5 %
19.1 %
45.3 %
41.2 %
21.6 %
13.7 %
33.8 %
74.0 %
33.0 %
19.9 %
48.1 %
31.8 %
11.3 %
40.9 %
53.4 %
24.4 %
48.9 %
40.6 %
84.5 %
35.0 %
17.2 %
20.5 %
46.1 %
22.1 %
39.8 %
7.9 %
20.3 %
31.5 %
33.9 %
7.2 %
COMP
211.1 %
133.9 %
113.8 %
183.3 %
181.4 %
220.6 %
180.5 %
102.4 %
102.1 %
186.4 %
149.6 %
149.3 %
300.0 %
137.3 %
139.8 %
127.1 %
104.3 %
228.3 %
101.8 %
[ continued ]
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
94590
94596
94804
94806
94941
95020
95023
95060
95076
95121
95123
95126
95127
95205
95207
95336
95348
95350
95376
95405
95422
95503
95660
95661
95687
95695
95814
95816
95820
95973
95991
96002
96093
96145
25.3 %
1.4 %
44.6 %
23.2 %
1.1 %
1.6 %
1.1 %
1.6 %
0.7 %
5.0 %
4.1 %
4.7 %
3.6 %
8.7 %
10.1 %
2.3 %
6.8 %
3.6 %
6.6 %
1.2 %
5.1 %
0.9 %
12.1 %
1.3 %
12.3 %
1.2 %
13.6 %
4.9 %
11.9 %
1.0 %
2.6 %
1.0 %
0.2 %
0.4 %
377.6 %
22.1 %
7.7 %
22.6 %
35.5 %
3.7 %
51.1 %
49.5 %
17.9 %
63.8 %
30.5 %
20.5 %
37.1 %
53.6 %
58.0 %
23.8 %
23.9 %
35.6 %
19.8 %
27.0 %
8.8 %
11.0 %
5.4 %
16.7 %
7.9 %
16.4 %
35.5 %
19.7 %
14.1 %
35.8 %
10.6 %
26.0 %
5.7 %
4.3 %
3.1 %
665.6 %
346.2 %
129.8 %
150.7 %
101.4 %
180.5 %
183.5 %
202.9 %
177.6 %
126.2 %
164.8 %
150.9 %
125.3 %
260.8 %
108.0 %
142.2 %
122.8 %
104.6 %
6
ZIP
BLACK
80003
80012
80129
80134
80207
80218
80224
80232
80302
80446
80501
80521
80634
80477
80907
80917
81008
81050
1.0 %
19.0 %
1.2 %
0.9 %
56.3 %
6.6 %
9.5 %
0.9 %
1.1 %
1.3 %
0.5 %
1.3 %
0.7 %
0.1 %
2.3 %
5.3 %
1.4 %
1.1 %
109.5 %
157.7 %
152.7 %
196.9 %
114.5 %
165.4 %
179.0 %
109.8 %
109.5 %
110.4 %
Black Population 3.8%
Hispanic Population 17.1%
COLORADO
148.4 %
COMP
COMP
500.0 %
1481.5 %
173.6 %
250.0 %
139.4 %
HISPANIC
15.0 %
16.9 %
8.4 %
4.8 %
15.4 %
11.4 %
10.5 %
15.6 %
4.7 %
3.8 %
22.7 %
10.8 %
15.8 %
3.1 %
11.3 %
8.8 %
30.5 %
36.5 %
COMP
132.7 %
178.3 %
213.4 %
COLORADO
ZIP
[ continued ]
HISPANIC
COMP
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
1.0 %
0.1 %
43.0 %
8.6 %
251.4 %
40.1 %
17.1 %
5.1 %
22.2 %
13.9 %
5.0 %
7.0 %
4.2 %
4.0 %
7.8 %
67.4 %
12.5 %
15.1 %
6.4 %
238.6 %
101.7 %
11.3 %
15.2 %
17.9 %
22.1 %
1.2 %
9.3 %
27.4 %
2.8 %
5.0 %
26.9 %
1.4 %
0.7 %
18.3 %
8.9 %
10.5 %
12.3 %
122.6 %
151.3 %
0.2 %
0.2 %
33176
33409
33434
33463
33617
33702
33803
33881
33919
34103
34142
34203
34236
34994
BLACK
81101
81201
81303 *
81321
81601
FLORIDA
[ continued ]
COMP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
CONNECTICUT
ZIP
BLACK
06040
06052
06082
06110
06112
06226
06239
06320
06360
06451
06475
06484
06511
06604
06708
06790
06810
06902
8.4 %
6.6 %
5.6 %
10.1 %
86.6 %
6.1 %
1.6 %
18.6 %
6.3 %
6.0 %
1.0 %
1.1 %
46.1 %
26.7 %
7.7 %
22.1 %
7.0 %
23.6 %
HISPANIC
COMP
110.9 %
951.6 %
204.3 %
506.5 %
293.4 %
242.8 %
259.3 %
6.5 %
14.1 %
3.7 %
13.4 %
9.3 %
32.3 %
2.6 %
19.7 %
5.5 %
22.1 %
1.9 %
3.5 %
11.2 %
32.4 %
12.0 %
3.3 %
21.1 %
25.1 %
9.1%
9.4%
COMP
150.0 %
ZIP
BLACK
19711
19801
19901
19971
5.6 %
82.9 %
28.5 %
5.9 %
343.6 %
HISPANIC
431.7 %
148.4 %
4.4 %
6.7 %
4.4 %
2.2 %
209.5 %
235.1 %
119.1 %
344.6 %
127.6 %
224.4 %
267.0 %
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
32207
32250
32304
32601
32805
32817
32960
33024
33145
33161
20.9 %
4.4 %
36.5 %
23.5 %
78.8 %
5.0 %
5.4 %
9.8 %
1.6 %
56.3 %
143.2 %
4.7 %
2.9 %
6.0 %
6.7 %
5.0 %
20.3 %
6.2 %
30.8 %
84.9 %
21.3 %
250.0 %
160.9 %
539.7 %
385.6 %
*
401.1 %
Black Population 28.7%
Hispanic Population 5.3%
ZIP
BLACK
30043
30062
30303
30901
31405
10.3 %
8.0 %
76.3 %
86.8 %
49.4 %
COMP
139.5 %
BLACK
COMP
8.2 %
7.8 %
3.7 %
BLACK
COMP
0.2 %
0.5 %
125.0 %
COMP
ZIP
BLACK
60462
60504
60603
60610
60622
60628
60636
0.6 %
7.5 %
2.1 %
27.1 %
10.9 %
94.8 %
97.8 %
Statistics for this ZIP code were not available.
7
HISPANIC
8.5 %
4.2 %
1.8%
7.2%
COMP
113.8 %
108.3 %
0.4%
7.9%
COMP
107.5 %
Black Population 15.1%
Hispanic Population 12.3%
ILLINOIS
183.3 %
505.3 %
126.7 %
101.8 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
83301
83703
120.8 %
HISPANIC
0.2 %
0.4 %
1.3 %
IDAHO
ZIP
5.4 %
4.5 %
5.1 %
1.1 %
2.4 %
COMP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
96732
96740
96814
COMP
HISPANIC
265.8 %
302.4 %
172.1 %
HAWAII
Black Population 14.6%
Hispanic Population 16.8%
FLORIDA
125.3 %
GEORGIA
Black Population 19.2%
Hispanic Population 4.8%
COMP
184.2 %
132.1 %
142.5 %
ZIP
DELAWARE
187.6 %
COMP
HISPANIC
179.4 %
4.0 %
7.4 %
7.4 %
3.9 %
45.2 %
3.1 %
1.2 %
627.8 %
647.6 %
COMP
367.4 %
ILLINOIS
IOWA
[ continued ]
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
ZIP
60651
60660
61350
61554
61603
61701
61820
62226
62401
62526
62703
70.6 %
17.8 %
1.1 %
2.0 %
32.1 %
10.0 %
16.1 %
14.5 %
0.3 %
15.3 %
32.8 %
467.5 %
117.8 %
26.8 %
20.8 %
4.5 %
1.2 %
4.9 %
3.7 %
5.5 %
1.5 %
1.0 %
1.3 %
1.2 %
217.8 %
169.1 %
50322
50501
50588
50613
50801
51106
51301
51501
51566
52001
52246
52353
52402
52601
52627
52632
52641
52722
212.5 %
106.6 %
101.3 %
217.2 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
INDIANA
ZIP
BLACK
46123
46208
46227
46229
46250
46268
46312
46324
46360
46383
46408
46410
46516
46545
46580
46804
47150
47170
47203
47250
47274
47304
47374
47403
47421
47711
47807
47905
0.4 %
68.1 %
2.5 %
19.8 %
7.5 %
27.9 %
36.1 %
9.3 %
19.3 %
1.2 %
55.5 %
25.1 %
15.9 %
4.8 %
1.1 %
2.5 %
6.5 %
0.1 %
2.0 %
1.7 %
0.8 %
3.9 %
7.2 %
3.3 %
0.5 %
2.5 %
16.0 %
2.2 %
COMP
810.7 %
235.7 %
332.1 %
429.7 %
110.7 %
229.7 %
660.7 %
298.8 %
189.2 %
190.4 %
50014
50023
50138
50208
50311
50315
50315
1.4 %
1.0 %
3.3 %
2.8 %
3.4 %
4.0 %
51.6 %
17.0 %
2.7 %
3.1 %
7.4 %
9.4 %
14.1 %
3.2 %
7.3 %
2.4 %
1.3 %
0.8 %
1.6 %
1.1 %
3.6 %
1.3 %
1.7 %
1.4 %
1.1 %
0.9 %
1.6 %
6.4 %
COMP
BLACK
COMP
2.5 %
0.8 %
0.9 %
1.3 %
9.3 %
3.0 %
3.0 %
119.0 %
442.8 %
142.8 %
142.8 %
HISPANIC
2.1 %
1.1 %
0.8 %
1.3 %
6.1 %
6.4 %
6.4 %
BLACK
1.7 %
4.4 %
0.4 %
1.5 %
0.3 %
0.9 %
0.2 %
1.3 %
0.1 %
1.4 %
4.7 %
0.5 %
2.9 %
4.5 %
4.0 %
3.4 %
2.3 %
1.5 %
COMP
114.2 %
1474.2 %
485.7 %
211.4 %
268.5 %
402.8 %
223.8 %
138.0 %
214.2 %
190.4 %
161.9 %
109.5 %
1.8 %
2.9 %
18.3 %
1.0 %
1.1 %
4.9 %
1.3 %
5.6 %
1.8 %
1.9 %
2.9 %
3.9 %
1.7 %
1.9 %
4.8 %
1.0 %
1.5 %
2.4 %
COMP
103.5 %
653.5 %
175.0 %
200.0 %
103.5 %
139.2 %
171.4 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
5.7 %
7.0%
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
66211
67214
67601
1.5 %
55.4 %
0.8 %
971.9 %
1.2 %
18.8 %
2.6 %
268.5 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
KENTUCKY
208.5 %
HISPANIC
209.5 %
KANSAS
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
40203
40475
40508
62.1 %
5.4 %
31.7 %
850.6 %
HISPANIC
434.2 %
1.5 %
1.0 %
3.8 %
7.3%
1.5%
COMP
253.3 %
102.8 %
Black Population 32.5%
Hispanic Population 2.4%
LOUISIANA
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
70115
70806
51.0 %
45.1 %
156.9 %
138.7 %
HISPANIC
3.2 %
1.4 %
COMP
133.3 %
182.8 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
IOWA
ZIP
HISPANIC
8.4%
3.5%
[ continued ]
Black Population
Hispanic Population
MAINE
2.1%
2.8%
ZIP
COMP
04005
04073
04086
04101
217.8 %
228.5 %
228.5 %
8
BLACK
COMP
0.6 %
0.5 %
1.3 %
4.6 %
120.0 %
260.0 %
920.0 %
HISPANIC
0.6 %
1.1 %
1.2 %
2.8 %
0.5%
0.7%
COMP
157.1 %
171.4 %
400.0 %
Black Population 27.9%
Hispanic Population 4.3%
MARYLAND
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
20602
20879
20910
21117
21201
21234
21401
21601
21702
21801
30.8 %
17.2 %
31.6 %
24.9 %
61.7 %
17.0 %
18.2 %
17.9 %
10.2 %
35.4 %
110.3 %
2.7 %
13.1 %
13.5 %
3.0 %
1.9 %
1.5 %
3.0 %
2.5 %
5.1 %
2.7 %
113.2 %
221.1 %
126.8 %
MASSACHUSETTS
ZIP
01107
01420
01609
01752
01757
02144
02215
48093
48103
48104
48114
48150
48198
48201
48509
48532
48604
48823
48846
48867
48912
49006
49015
49022
49036
49091
49093
49202
49307
49442
49503
49519 *
49686
118.6 %
5.4%
6.8%
HISPANIC
COMP
8.1 %
3.6 %
6.3 %
2.2 %
1.3 %
4.8 %
3.7 %
150.0 %
75.9 %
15.0 %
15.5 %
6.1 %
4.4 %
3.7 %
7.2 %
1116.1 %
220.5 %
227.9 %
1.5 %
7.3 %
5.2 %
0.4 %
0.7 %
29.5 %
75.1 %
2.9 %
18.4 %
7.2 %
6.0 %
13.7 %
0.2 %
13.3 %
13.5 %
7.4 %
57.1 %
4.5 %
0.9 %
7.0 %
6.3 %
6.5 %
22.9 %
22.2 %
0.3 %
49770
49855
105.8 %
Black Population 14.2%
Hispanic Population 3.3%
COMP
207.7 %
528.8 %
129.5 %
402.1 %
161.2 %
156.3 %
HISPANIC
1.0 %
2.5 %
3.6 %
1.0 %
1.9 %
2.5 %
1.9 %
2.3 %
2.1 %
7.8 %
3.0 %
4.1 %
2.3 %
10.7 %
2.6 %
4.1 %
2.6 %
2.9 %
8.6 %
2.2 %
3.1 %
1.5 %
5.5 %
15.3 %
[ continued ]
BLACK
COMP
109.0 %
0.2 %
2.4 %
ZIP
BLACK
55060
55066
55113
55116
55124
55125
55344
55404
55408
55445
55744
55792
55811
55901
56001
56007
56031
56201
56304
56308
56401
56560
56601
56701
1.3 %
1.2 %
2.8 %
4.6 %
2.0 %
2.7 %
5.3 %
27.9 %
16.1 %
8.9 %
0.2 %
0.4 %
1.5 %
2.5 %
1.6 %
0.3 %
0.4 %
0.8 %
3.6 %
0.2 %
0.4 %
0.7 %
0.4 %
0.2 %
COMP
1.0 %
0.7 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
COMP
131.4 %
151.4 %
797.1 %
460.0 %
254.2 %
102.8 %
3.5%
2.9%
HISPANIC
COMP
4.0 %
1.2 %
2.0 %
4.8 %
2.0 %
2.2 %
3.1 %
15.6 %
15.5 %
1.5 %
0.6 %
0.8 %
1.1 %
2.3 %
2.0 %
8.4 %
2.7 %
13.5 %
1.5 %
0.6 %
0.8 %
4.2 %
0.9 %
1.3 %
137.9 %
165.5 %
106.8 %
537.9 %
534.4 %
289.6 %
465.5 %
144.8 %
Black Population 36.3%
Hispanic Population 1.4%
MISSISSIPPI
236.3 %
HISPANIC
COMP
MINNESOTA
COMP
BLACK
ZIP
304.6 %
131.9 %
BLACK
MICHIGAN
ZIP
COMP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
116.6 %
MICHIGAN
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
39401
49.6 %
136.6 %
HISPANIC
COMP
1.3 %
124.2 %
Black Population 11.2%
Hispanic Population 2.1%
MISSOURI
324.2 %
124.2 %
260.6 %
166.6 %
463.6 %
1.6 %
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
63033
63088
63108
63108
63118
63376
64030
64050
64093
64110
43.4 %
3.5 %
44.8 %
44.8 %
52.7 %
2.4 %
33.5 %
2.7 %
5.1 %
55.9 %
387.5 %
* Statistics for this ZIP code were not available.
9
400.0 %
400.0 %
470.5 %
299.1 %
499.1 %
HISPANIC
1.2 %
2.3 %
1.9 %
1.9 %
3.7 %
1.5 %
4.3 %
4.0 %
2.2 %
3.4 %
COMP
109.5 %
176.1 %
204.7 %
190.4 %
104.7 %
161.9 %
MISSOURI
ZIP
BLACK
64119
64801
65049
65109
65203
65401
65807
1.9 %
2.6 %
0.1 %
6.7 %
10.3 %
1.9 %
3.1 %
COMP
ZIP
59102
59105
59254
59254
59255
59323
59327
59401
59422
59442
59601
59802
BLACK
0.3 %
0.4 %
0.1 %
0.1 %
0.1 %
0.7 %
0.1 %
1.0 %
0.1 %
0.2 %
0.2 %
0.3 %
68134
68137
68506
68510
COMP
HISPANIC
133.3 %
233.3 %
333.3 %
2.3 %
2.6 %
1.1 %
1.1 %
1.0 %
3.0 %
1.3 %
2.7 %
1.2 %
0.6 %
1.6 %
1.8 %
BLACK
COMP
7.4 %
1.2 %
1.2 %
2.8 %
185.0 %
HISPANIC
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
180.9 %
109.5 %
07018
07042
07060
07102
07105
07201
07442
07505
07601
07631
07702
07728
07730
07860
07960
08010
08031
08103
08401
08608
08628
08690
08822
08835
08861
08865
08884
08901
90.9 %
43.5 %
34.6 %
65.5 %
5.6 %
33.4 %
1.6 %
40.9 %
24.6 %
39.0 %
0.5 %
6.9 %
1.1 %
1.6 %
10.4 %
23.3 %
1.7 %
69.8 %
44.2 %
52.1 %
17.7 %
1.3 %
1.3 %
0.5 %
9.7 %
2.2 %
1.5 %
23.0 %
668.3 %
319.8 %
254.4 %
481.6 %
4.1 %
5.7 %
29.9 %
22.8 %
35.2 %
44.5 %
5.7 %
46.9 %
25.9 %
21.8 %
1.9 %
9.9 %
5.8 %
2.5 %
13.7 %
6.1 %
3.9 %
26.4 %
24.9 %
32.9 %
4.8 %
2.3 %
3.7 %
5.4 %
67.7 %
3.7 %
4.4 %
39.0 %
109.5 %
0.3%
2.0%
COMP
115.0 %
130.0 %
150.0 %
135.0 %
4.0%
5.5%
COMP
HISPANIC
89032
89102
89121
89502
89503
26.7 %
7.5 %
6.4 %
2.5 %
1.8 %
392.6 %
110.2 %
17.6 %
38.0 %
18.9 %
33.6 %
9.9 %
NEW HAMPSHIRE
ZIP
87108
87108
87112
87124
87401
87505
COMP
192.8 %
COMP
0.9 %
1.9 %
0.4 %
0.3 %
1.1 %
0.5 %
128.5 %
271.4 %
157.1 %
HISPANIC
1.9 %
2.8 %
0.8 %
0.5 %
2.6 %
0.9 %
171.3 %
513.2 %
325.0 %
383.0 %
130.1 %
169.1 %
0.7%
1.7%
COMP
111.7 %
164.7 %
152.9 %
10
COMP
224.8 %
171.4 %
264.6 %
334.5 %
352.6 %
194.7 %
163.9 %
103.0 %
198.4 %
187.2 %
247.3 %
509.0 %
293.2 %
Black Population 1.9%
Hispanic Population 42.1%
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
4.4 %
4.4 %
2.8 %
2.6 %
0.8 %
0.7 %
231.5 %
231.5 %
147.3 %
136.8 %
45.5 %
45.5 %
27.5 %
28.2 %
18.8 %
52.5 %
108.0 %
108.0 %
ZIP
BLACK
10012
10301
10451
10509
10550
10607
10701
10801
10924
10940
10977
11201
2.9 %
23.9 %
46.1 %
2.1 %
69.3 %
32.5 %
28.6 %
27.7 %
6.1 %
11.9 %
33.4 %
20.7 %
124.7 %
Black Population 15.9%
Hispanic Population 15.1%
NEW YORK
170.5 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
BLACK
300.7 %
180.8 %
286.7 %
NEW MEXICO
Black Population 6.8%
Hispanic Population 19.7%
BLACK
245.5 %
COMP
2.5 %
2.7 %
1.8 %
3.4 %
ZIP
03038
03104
03431
03743
03784
03833
ZIP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
NEVADA
ZIP
COMP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
NEBRASKA
ZIP
HISPANIC
3.8 %
2.3 %
1.2 %
1.5 %
2.0 %
1.4 %
2.3 %
MONTANA
Black Population 13.6%
Hispanic Population 13.3%
NEW JERSEY
[ continued ]
COMP
150.3 %
289.9 %
435.8 %
204.4 %
179.8 %
174.2 %
210.0 %
130.1 %
HISPANIC
7.5 %
18.3 %
55.0 %
7.9 %
11.6 %
12.6 %
34.3 %
27.8 %
7.1 %
19.7 %
11.4 %
14.4 %
COMP
121.1 %
364.2 %
227.1 %
184.1 %
130.4 %
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
[ continued ]
ZIP
BLACK
11542
11550
11743
11758
11772
11787
11795
11901
11930
12010
12043
12065
12095
12180
12206
12307
12401
12534
12550
12601
12701
12801
12832
12866
12883
12901
12953
12983
13210
13350
13367
13421
13440
13502
13601
13617
13669
13815
13820
13838
13856
13901
14020
14120
14214
14224
14301
14304
14424
14605
14626
14830
14843
14850
14891
14901
6.2 %
50.9 %
6.4 %
4.5 %
5.1 %
0.7 %
0.3 %
20.4 %
1.5 %
1.6 %
1.7 %
1.5 %
4.7 %
9.7 %
48.0 %
43.2 %
9.3 %
12.1 %
21.6 %
26.6 %
20.2 %
1.3 %
0.4 %
2.6 %
0.5 %
1.9 %
17.1 %
0.6 %
22.1 %
1.0 %
0.5 %
0.7 %
6.1 %
8.1 %
5.2 %
2.5 %
6.9 %
1.0 %
4.0 %
0.8 %
0.4 %
4.9 %
4.1 %
0.4 %
37.5 %
0.5 %
19.4 %
2.4 %
1.0 %
59.1 %
3.1 %
2.4 %
1.7 %
4.6 %
0.7 %
16.7 %
COMP
320.1 %
128.3 %
301.8 %
271.6 %
135.8 %
167.2 %
127.0 %
107.5 %
138.9 %
235.8 %
122.0 %
371.6 %
105.0 %
HISPANIC
COMP
ZIP
BLACK
19.4 %
31.0 %
4.8 %
4.5 %
14.0 %
3.4 %
3.4 %
9.0 %
5.0 %
11.0 %
2.2 %
1.7 %
3.1 %
3.6 %
6.7 %
13.2 %
5.1 %
4.9 %
24.2 %
8.6 %
16.9 %
1.4 %
0.5 %
1.7 %
0.4 %
1.7 %
10.3 %
0.9 %
4.4 %
1.2 %
0.7 %
0.8 %
3.9 %
3.8 %
3.6 %
1.3 %
4.4 %
1.0 %
3.2 %
1.5 %
1.1 %
2.1 %
1.9 %
1.0 %
2.8 %
0.8 %
2.7 %
1.0 %
1.1 %
31.7 %
2.5 %
0.7 %
1.1 %
3.9 %
0.7 %
3.9 %
128.4 %
205.2 %
27103
27408
27514
27603
27704
28205
28303
28401
28801
17.5 %
6.7 %
9.2 %
21.5 %
52.0 %
39.8 %
37.2 %
51.6 %
44.8 %
Black Population 21.6%
Hispanic Population 4.7%
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
174.4 %
240.7 %
184.2 %
172.2 %
238.8 %
207.4 %
8.2 %
1.4 %
3.3 %
8.4 %
4.9 %
12.6 %
7.0 %
2.7 %
2.5 %
178.7 %
104.2 %
268.0 %
148.9 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
NORTH DAKOTA
0.6%
1.2%
[ There are no Planned Parenthood facilities in this state. ]
Black Population 11.5%
Hispanic Population 1.9%
OHIO
160.2 %
111.9 %
209.9 %
11
ZIP
BLACK
43015
43113
43201
43213
43222
43528
43604
44052
44103
44109
44116
44139
44146
44240
44256
44266
44302
44410
44507
44691
44709
44833
44906
45011
45044
45219
45238
45245
45246
45324
45402
45504
45701
3.4 %
1.8 %
20.9 %
24.4 %
13.1 %
7.1 %
39.7 %
19.1 %
79.1 %
7.0 %
0.4 %
6.1 %
38.8 %
6.0 %
1.6 %
3.2 %
41.8 %
0.9 %
62.1 %
2.5 %
5.4 %
0.2 %
5.7 %
8.9 %
11.6 %
42.3 %
5.1 %
0.8 %
23.6 %
6.7 %
38.4 %
3.5 %
3.2 %
COMP
181.7 %
212.1 %
113.9 %
345.2 %
166.0 %
687.8 %
337.3 %
363.4 %
540.0 %
100.8 %
367.8 %
205.2 %
333.9 %
HISPANIC
1.0 %
0.7 %
2.8 %
3.3 %
2.2 %
2.7 %
10.7 %
16.8 %
4.3 %
19.7 %
1.2 %
0.7 %
1.3 %
0.9 %
0.9 %
0.7 %
1.9 %
0.6 %
6.3 %
0.8 %
0.9 %
0.8 %
1.2 %
2.7 %
1.1 %
1.5 %
0.7 %
0.9 %
4.4 %
1.7 %
1.9 %
0.9 %
1.3 %
COMP
147.3 %
173.6 %
115.7 %
142.1 %
563.1 %
884.2 %
226.3 %
1036.8 %
331.5 %
142.1 %
231.5 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
OKLAHOMA
ZIP
BLACK
73013
73069
73103
73110
73139
74012
74105
74107
74120
6.2 %
3.2 %
20.0 %
19.7 %
5.5 %
4.1 %
7.6 %
9.5 %
8.1 %
COMP
HISPANIC
263.1 %
259.2 %
125.0 %
106.5 %
2.4 %
4.9 %
5.2 %
4.4 %
11.0 %
4.0 %
5.0 %
4.3 %
10.9 %
211.5 %
209.6 %
1.6%
8.0%
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
97005
97015
97030
97030
97128
97206
97212
97305
97401
97402
97424
97439
97477
97501
97520
97526
97701
2.0 %
1.2 %
1.9 %
1.9 %
0.6 %
1.7 %
14.1 %
1.0 %
1.5 %
1.2 %
0.1 %
0.2 %
0.8 %
0.5 %
0.6 %
0.3 %
0.3 %
125.0 %
21.5 %
4.0 %
10.2 %
10.2 %
13.4 %
6.5 %
4.2 %
20.4 %
3.9 %
7.2 %
3.9 %
2.2 %
7.6 %
12.5 %
3.4 %
4.7 %
3.7 %
268.7 %
118.7 %
118.7 %
106.2 %
881.2 %
BLACK
15017
15108
15222
15501
15601
15901
16801
17013
17102
17202
17325
17331
17356
17401
17602
18045
18101
18360
18503
18701
4.2 %
4.6 %
24.8 %
1.1 %
1.9 %
21.8 %
2.9 %
3.4 %
46.2 %
7.6 %
2.8 %
0.5 %
0.5 %
21.5 %
11.5 %
2.3 %
19.9 %
4.2 %
8.7 %
5.3 %
127.5 %
127.5 %
167.5 %
255.0 %
COMP
248.0 %
218.0 %
462.0 %
215.0 %
115.0 %
199.0 %
HISPANIC
0.8 %
0.9 %
1.1 %
0.5 %
0.6 %
2.0 %
2.3 %
1.4 %
6.0 %
6.4 %
4.1 %
1.4 %
1.0 %
14.2 %
24.3 %
2.3 %
45.7 %
4.7 %
3.0 %
2.3 %
ZIP
BLACK
18901
18951
18974
19002
19007
19020
19050
19063
19087
19107
19107
19152
19154
19311
19320
19382
19401
19426
19464
19602
1.7 %
0.9 %
2.9 %
5.7 %
14.7 %
5.9 %
43.9 %
6.0 %
2.8 %
11.8 %
11.8 %
4.1 %
5.6 %
5.3 %
22.8 %
6.4 %
29.9 %
9.9 %
10.9 %
11.0 %
[ continued ]
HISPANIC
COMP
147.0 %
439.0 %
118.0 %
118.0 %
228.0 %
299.0 %
109.0 %
110.0 %
1.5 %
1.6 %
4.1 %
1.3 %
8.9 %
4.5 %
1.2 %
1.1 %
1.6 %
3.8 %
3.8 %
4.8 %
3.2 %
24.6 %
4.5 %
2.5 %
8.9 %
2.4 %
3.0 %
43.0 %
COMP
278.1 %
140.6 %
118.7 %
118.7 %
150.0 %
768.7 %
140.6 %
278.1 %
1343.7 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
RHODE ISLAND
4.5%
8.7%
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
02903
12.4 %
275.5 %
15.2 %
174.7 %
156.2 %
SOUTH CAROLINA
Black Population 10.0%
Hispanic Population 3.2%
PENNSYLVANIA
ZIP
PENNSYLVANIA
COMP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
OREGON
7.6%
5.2%
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
29204
29403
60.9 %
68.8 %
206.4 %
233.2 %
COMP
ZIP
57106
57702
BLACK
COMP
0.9 %
0.4 %
150.0 %
1428.1 %
146.8 %
12
COMP
1.6 %
1.5 %
HISPANIC
0.6%
1.4%
COMP
1.3 %
1.4 %
Black Population 16.4%
Hispanic Population 2.2%
TENNESSEE
443.7 %
759.3 %
HISPANIC
Black Population
Hispanic Population
SOUTH DAKOTA
187.5 %
200.0 %
128.1 %
Black Population 29.5%
Hispanic Population 2.4%
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
37203
37914
38112
53.4 %
41.2 %
56.4 %
325.6 %
251.2 %
343.9 %
HISPANIC
3.2 %
0.9 %
3.0 %
COMP
145.4 %
136.3 %
Black Population 11.5%
Hispanic Population 32.0%
TEXAS
ZIP
BLACK
75041
75062
75067
75069
75074
75074
75090
75110
75150
75150
75160
75165
75231
75231
75237
75254
75460
75701
75904
76010
76015
76021
76028
76104
76114
76116
76119
76205
76240
76642
76661
76701
76706
76901
77023
77037
77068
77081
77340
77471
77477
77539
77802
78201
78212
78217
78223
78227
78237
78238
78332
78363
78501
78521
78521
78539
78539
78550
10.7 %
9.6 %
7.9 %
9.5 %
8.1 %
8.1 %
12.8 %
19.4 %
10.4 %
10.4 %
24.0 %
13.3 %
27.2 %
27.2 %
88.6 %
9.8 %
23.3 %
21.1 %
18.8 %
16.0 %
10.1 %
3.5 %
0.7 %
57.2 %
3.3 %
10.4 %
55.5 %
7.9 %
4.3 %
17.9 %
41.5 %
27.7 %
13.1 %
3.2 %
1.8 %
3.0 %
13.0 %
9.0 %
18.7 %
7.4 %
16.6 %
10.7 %
6.1 %
1.9 %
2.5 %
9.3 %
4.3 %
7.9 %
2.8 %
4.7 %
0.7 %
3.9 %
0.5 %
0.3 %
0.3 %
1.4 %
1.4 %
0.9 %
COMP
111.3 %
168.6 %
208.6 %
115.6 %
236.5 %
236.5 %
770.4 %
202.6 %
183.4 %
163.4 %
139.1 %
497.3 %
155.6 %
482.6 %
360.8 %
240.8 %
113.9 %
113.0 %
162.6 %
144.3 %
TEXAS
[ continued ]
HISPANIC
COMP
ZIP
BLACK
39.0 %
26.9 %
16.5 %
28.5 %
27.4 %
27.4 %
15.4 %
19.0 %
16.1 %
16.1 %
14.5 %
18.8 %
40.5 %
40.5 %
7.3 %
40.4 %
4.1 %
10.5 %
11.9 %
39.7 %
11.7 %
6.7 %
5.5 %
26.2 %
27.9 %
18.6 %
23.2 %
11.5 %
12.4 %
14.2 %
16.4 %
22.8 %
28.1 %
26.5 %
86.0 %
64.0 %
13.6 %
71.3 %
13.3 %
53.1 %
27.2 %
22.5 %
11.0 %
82.0 %
61.0 %
31.1 %
67.3 %
63.7 %
94.5 %
59.9 %
79.5 %
66.2 %
84.0 %
93.4 %
93.4 %
89.7 %
89.7 %
74.3 %
121.8 %
78572
78579
78580
78582
78589
78596
78702
78704
78758
79412
79603
79701
79761
0.3 %
0.0 %
3.0 %
0.2 %
0.3 %
0.2 %
23.7 %
4.9 %
11.5 %
10.5 %
9.9 %
12.1 %
8.7 %
126.5 %
126.5 %
126.2 %
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
206.0 %
88.4 %
98.6 %
85.9 %
97.4 %
95.4 %
88.3 %
67.7 %
34.0 %
32.1 %
42.9 %
35.5 %
50.2 %
46.9 %
276.2 %
308.1 %
268.4 %
304.3 %
298.1 %
275.9 %
211.5 %
106.2 %
100.3 %
134.0 %
110.9 %
156.8 %
146.5 %
105.2 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
UTAH
ZIP
BLACK
84057
84060
84095
84102
84102
84119
84321
84403
84770
124.0 %
0.4 %
0.4 %
0.3 %
1.8 %
1.8 %
1.6 %
0.5 %
1.4 %
0.3 %
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
117.7 %
221.1 %
225.0 %
225.0 %
200.0 %
10.6 %
19.9 %
3.3 %
11.9 %
11.9 %
21.3 %
7.8 %
14.6 %
8.4 %
175.0 %
BLACK
COMP
0.6 %
0.8 %
1.8 %
0.3 %
0.5 %
0.3 %
0.4 %
0.4 %
0.9 %
0.6 %
120.0 %
160.0 %
360.0 %
05201
05301
05401
05478
05495
05641
05655
05701
05753
05855
268.7 %
200.0 %
222.8 %
165.9 %
256.2 %
190.6 %
210.3 %
199.0 %
295.3 %
187.1 %
248.4 %
206.8 %
262.5 %
291.8 %
291.8 %
280.3 %
280.3 %
232.1 %
HISPANIC
180.0 %
120.0 %
162.2 %
1.0 %
1.4 %
1.4 %
0.7 %
1.0 %
1.6 %
0.8 %
0.8 %
1.9 %
1.1 %
0.5%
0.9%
COMP
111.1 %
155.5 %
155.5 %
111.1 %
177.7 %
211.1 %
122.2 %
Black Population 19.6%
Hispanic Population 4.7%
VIRGINIA
13
132.2 %
132.2 %
236.6 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
VERMONT
ZIP
0.8%
9.0%
ZIP
BLACK
22046
22901
23221
23462
23666
24017
24060
3.3 %
11.6 %
13.1 %
31.6 %
43.9 %
66.4 %
3.9 %
COMP
161.2 %
223.9 %
338.7 %
HISPANIC
COMP
10.8 %
3.1 %
1.6 %
4.5 %
3.0 %
1.2 %
2.1 %
229.7 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
WASHINGTON
3.2%
7.5%
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
ZIP
BLACK
98003
98007
98027
98028
98031
98036
98105
98122
98126
98133
98201
98225
98250
98271
98273
98277
98310
98331
98362
98373
98382
98383
98405
98501
98531
98584
98662
98686
98902
98926
98944
99163
99206
99207
99207
99301
99336
99362
8.8 %
2.9 %
0.8 %
1.3 %
7.4 %
2.6 %
2.0 %
25.0 %
7.3 %
4.2 %
3.5 %
0.9 %
0.3 %
0.5 %
0.6 %
4.2 %
5.2 %
1.4 %
0.4 %
2.4 %
0.2 %
2.9 %
21.7 %
1.1 %
0.3 %
1.5 %
1.9 %
1.0 %
1.6 %
0.8 %
0.4 %
2.3 %
0.9 %
2.5 %
2.5 %
2.7 %
1.2 %
2.1 %
275.0 %
8.6 %
9.8 %
3.4 %
3.6 %
6.1 %
6.4 %
3.7 %
6.9 %
6.1 %
5.2 %
6.6 %
4.4 %
2.8 %
4.2 %
23.3 %
5.7 %
4.5 %
12.8 %
2.0 %
3.9 %
2.3 %
4.1 %
6.0 %
3.8 %
9.0 %
6.0 %
4.2 %
4.6 %
28.8 %
5.4 %
66.6 %
3.7 %
2.7 %
3.4 %
3.4 %
47.9 %
18.6 %
16.0 %
114.6 %
130.6 %
53038
53081
53090
53115
53142
53186
53202
53204
53212
53216
53227
53233
53403
53704
53713
53901
53916
54166
54220
54301
54494
54703
54729
54902
54911
54913
54935
0.2 %
0.9 %
0.2 %
0.9 %
2.4 %
1.0 %
8.8 %
8.2 %
63.0 %
75.7 %
2.1 %
34.4 %
28.6 %
7.0 %
17.3 %
2.8 %
0.3 %
0.2 %
0.5 %
3.9 %
0.3 %
0.6 %
0.2 %
0.6 %
1.1 %
0.4 %
1.6 %
231.2 %
781.2 %
228.1 %
131.2 %
678.1 %
ZIP
26105
BLACK
1.0 %
310.6 %
170.6 %
120.0 %
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
HISPANIC
154.3 %
143.8 %
1105.2 %
1328.0 %
603.5 %
501.7 %
122.8 %
303.5 %
2.9 %
6.4 %
1.6 %
14.4 %
4.9 %
9.6 %
3.4 %
64.8 %
10.3 %
2.2 %
3.2 %
5.2 %
15.4 %
4.7 %
15.1 %
2.6 %
3.9 %
1.3 %
2.2 %
5.2 %
0.9 %
0.9 %
0.6 %
1.6 %
2.2 %
0.8 %
2.6 %
5.7%
3.6%
COMP
177.7 %
400.0 %
136.1 %
266.6 %
1800.0 %
286.1 %
144.4 %
427.7 %
130.5 %
419.4 %
108.3 %
144.4 %
384.0 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
WYOMING
888.0 %
ZIP
82604
638.6 %
248.0 %
213.3 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
WEST VIRGINIA
Black Population
Hispanic Population
WISCONSIN
BLACK
COMP
0.4 %
COMP
0.6 %
14
COMP
3.3 %
WASHINGTON, DC
3.2%
0.7%
HISPANIC
0.8%
6.4%
Black Population 60.0%
Hispanic Population 7.9%
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
20019
20036
97.7 %
5.2 %
162.8 %
HISPANIC
0.9 %
7.4 %
COMP
CHART 2 – INDEPENDENT ABORTION CLINIC LOCATIONS
Black Population 26.0%
Hispanic Population 1.7%
ALABAMA
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
35205
35404
35801
36109
40.0 %
35.7 %
9.7 %
7.4 %
153.8 %
137.3 %
BLACK
COMP
9.0 %
0.6 %
257.1 %
99508
99611
85006
85016
85018
85021
85712
ZIP
BLACK
152.9 %
90292
90504
90505
90806
91203
91205
91304
91304
91331
91335
91345
91356
91403
91405
91744
91763
91770
91911
91911
91911
92024
92025
92078
92103
92105
92115
92117
92123
92126
92234
92408
92505
92701
92701
92701
92868
93065
93301
93701
94110
94110
94115
94115
94520
94538
94541
94566
94607
94610
94954
95116
95204
4.3 %
3.5 %
1.6 %
20.5 %
1.8 %
1.4 %
4.5 %
4.5 %
5.3 %
4.2 %
4.2 %
3.8 %
3.6 %
6.0 %
2.1 %
6.2 %
0.6 %
4.5 %
4.5 %
4.5 %
0.5 %
2.1 %
2.0 %
2.5 %
15.1 %
10.9 %
1.9 %
9.2 %
2.9 %
2.7 %
14.4 %
6.0 %
1.4 %
1.4 %
1.4 %
2.7 %
1.2 %
11.3 %
6.9 %
4.2 %
4.2 %
17.8 %
17.8 %
4.5 %
3.6 %
12.9 %
1.1 %
50.8 %
23.9 %
1.3 %
2.9 %
4.1 %
HISPANIC
7.6 %
2.9 %
3.5%
4.1%
COMP
185.3 %
Black Population 3.1%
Hispanic Population 25.3%
ARIZONA
ZIP
2.6 %
1.7 %
1.2 %
1.1 %
COMP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
ALASKA
ZIP
HISPANIC
CALIFORNIA
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
4.0 %
3.8 %
2.6 %
3.8 %
4.0 %
129.0 %
73.3 %
29.2 %
16.0 %
25.6 %
19.3 %
289.7 %
129.0 %
Black Population 15.7%
Hispanic Population 3.2%
ARKANSAS
ZIP
BLACK
72211
14.2 %
COMP
ZIP
BLACK
5.1 %
12.8 %
78.5 %
8.5 %
3.1 %
1.5 %
15.1 %
15.1 %
5.5 %
5.5 %
5.5 %
5.5 %
1.9 %
1.9 %
2.8 %
0.7 %
HISPANIC
COMP
2.6 %
Black Population 6.7%
Hispanic Population 32.4%
CALIFORNIA
90005
90007
90008
90010
90025
90033
90034
90034
90057
90057
90057
90057
90211
90211
90241
90255
101.1 %
COMP
191.0 %
1171.6 %
126.8 %
225.3 %
225.3 %
HISPANIC
COMP
58.3 %
58.2 %
14.3 %
19.6 %
15.9 %
92.3 %
29.2 %
29.2 %
70.2 %
70.2 %
70.2 %
70.2 %
4.5 %
4.5 %
57.7 %
95.6 %
179.9 %
179.6 %
284.8 %
216.6 %
216.6 %
216.6 %
216.6 %
178.0 %
295.0 %
15
[ continued ]
COMP
305.9 %
225.3 %
162.6 %
137.3 %
214.9 %
168.6 %
102.9 %
265.6 %
265.6 %
192.5 %
758.2 %
356.7 %
HISPANIC
6.0 %
17.3 %
8.7 %
43.4 %
21.4 %
28.5 %
34.0 %
34.0 %
82.6 %
41.9 %
53.7 %
13.1 %
9.0 %
58.8 %
81.3 %
60.3 %
42.1 %
60.4 %
60.4 %
60.4 %
14.9 %
48.5 %
13.5 %
12.7 %
48.4 %
24.4 %
16.0 %
14.4 %
9.3 %
49.3 %
44.5 %
45.3 %
88.5 %
88.5 %
88.5 %
45.1 %
17.9 %
31.8 %
64.6 %
46.1 %
46.1 %
5.5 %
5.5 %
39.8 %
19.3 %
35.4 %
7.8 %
12.6 %
6.9 %
15.8 %
64.5 %
26.6 %
COMP
133.9 %
104.9 %
104.9 %
254.9 %
129.3 %
165.7 %
181.4 %
250.9 %
186.1 %
129.9 %
186.4 %
186.4 %
186.4 %
149.6 %
149.3 %
152.1 %
137.3 %
139.8 %
273.1 %
273.1 %
273.1 %
139.1 %
199.3 %
142.2 %
142.2 %
122.8 %
109.2 %
199.0 %
CALIFORNIA
ZIP
FLORIDA
[ continued ]
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
9.2 %
9.2 %
1.7 %
1.0 %
3.0 %
1.1 %
0.6 %
1.8 %
137.3 %
137.3 %
16.4 %
16.4 %
13.5 %
5.7 %
15.9 %
7.0 %
15.8 %
8.7 %
95825
95825
95928
96002
95355
95409
95437
95819
COMP
Black Population 3.8%
Hispanic Population 17.1%
COLORADO
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
80014
80111
80113
80113
80206
80210
80218
80220
80220
80246
80301
80304
81501
81611
81621
81657
8.2 %
1.6 %
3.8 %
3.8 %
6.7 %
1.6 %
6.6 %
15.6 %
15.6 %
7.4 %
1.6 %
0.8 %
0.9 %
0.6 %
0.3 %
0.4 %
215.7 %
6.8 %
5.4 %
1.0 %
1.0 %
7.9 %
6.7 %
11.4 %
16.7 %
16.7 %
21.4 %
8.7 %
9.7 %
13.7 %
5.7 %
22.8 %
7.9 %
176.3 %
173.6 %
410.5 %
410.5 %
194.7 %
COMP
125.1 %
133.3 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
CONNECTICUT
9.1%
9.4%
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
06106
06120
06606
06810
16.9 %
59.3 %
28.5 %
7.0 %
185.7 %
651.6 %
313.1 %
57.8 %
37.9 %
21.8 %
21.1 %
614.8 %
403.1 %
231.9 %
224.4 %
Black Population 19.2%
Hispanic Population 4.8%
DELAWARE
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
19802
19901
75.4 %
28.5 %
392.7 %
148.4 %
HISPANIC
COMP
3.2 %
4.4 %
Black Population 14.6%
Hispanic Population 16.8%
FLORIDA
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
32114
32117
32216
32216
46.3 %
24.4 %
19.6 %
19.6 %
317.1 %
167.1 %
134.2 %
134.2 %
HISPANIC
COMP
3.4 %
3.9 %
5.5 %
5.5 %
16
[ continued ]
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
32216
32301
32504
32504
32601
32609
32701
32803
32806
32812
33012
33012
33013
33013
33015
33021
33023
33065
33133
33134
33135
33135
33136
33143
33150
33155
33162
33162
33162
33166
33173
33183
33308
33311
33313
33313
33314
33317
33321
33321
33324
33334
33407
33606
33609
33612
33613
33710
33713
33756
33761
33813
33901
33903
33952
34239
34475
34950
19.6 %
47.1 %
12.1 %
12.1 %
23.5 %
39.9 %
15.7 %
5.1 %
5.3 %
6.5 %
1.6 %
1.6 %
1.5 %
1.5 %
18.1 %
7.0 %
45.1 %
13.3 %
16.4 %
0.9 %
2.3 %
2.3 %
61.9 %
12.0 %
71.1 %
1.1 %
48.6 %
48.6 %
48.6 %
5.4 %
2.2 %
2.8 %
0.9 %
81.3 %
67.9 %
67.9 %
5.4 %
20.1 %
7.4 %
7.4 %
6.7 %
12.3 %
60.6 %
11.4 %
7.0 %
29.0 %
19.1 %
1.6 %
9.4 %
6.5 %
0.8 %
4.3 %
22.1 %
1.5 %
5.2 %
0.9 %
53.3 %
56.2 %
134.2 %
322.6 %
5.5 %
3.5 %
2.7 %
2.7 %
6.7 %
4.1 %
14.2 %
8.4 %
9.7 %
21.1 %
90.0 %
90.0 %
90.3 %
90.3 %
62.0 %
17.8 %
24.1 %
18.9 %
44.9 %
69.1 %
92.9 %
92.9 %
28.2 %
42.9 %
18.6 %
75.8 %
25.6 %
25.6 %
25.6 %
62.1 %
64.6 %
73.9 %
6.4 %
3.5 %
7.9 %
7.9 %
22.2 %
17.5 %
14.4 %
14.4 %
14.2 %
21.5 %
9.3 %
7.8 %
21.4 %
17.9 %
17.1 %
4.4 %
6.1 %
8.2 %
3.8 %
5.1 %
10.4 %
4.8 %
5.5 %
5.2 %
4.5 %
18.1 %
160.9 %
273.2 %
107.5 %
123.9 %
308.9 %
112.3 %
423.9 %
486.9 %
332.8 %
332.8 %
332.8 %
556.8 %
465.0 %
465.0 %
137.6 %
415.0 %
198.6 %
130.8 %
151.3 %
365.0 %
384.9 %
COMP
125.5 %
535.7 %
535.7 %
537.5 %
537.5 %
369.0 %
105.9 %
143.4 %
112.5 %
267.2 %
411.3 %
552.9 %
552.9 %
167.8 %
255.3 %
110.7 %
451.1 %
152.3 %
152.3 %
152.3 %
369.6 %
384.5 %
439.8 %
132.1 %
104.1 %
127.9 %
127.3 %
106.5 %
101.7 %
107.7 %
Black Population 28.7%
Hispanic Population 5.3%
GEORGIA
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
30035
30067
30076
30324
30324
30329
30341
30341
30342
30349
30907
31401
31904
89.4 %
26.0 %
9.1 %
9.9 %
9.9 %
16.2 %
9.9 %
9.9 %
7.3 %
87.4 %
10.5 %
65.8 %
20.3 %
311.4 %
1.7 %
10.4 %
15.7 %
19.3 %
19.3 %
24.4 %
31.7 %
31.7 %
17.6 %
2.4 %
2.5 %
1.4 %
0.5 %
304.5 %
229.2 %
COMP
196.2 %
296.2 %
364.1 %
364.1 %
460.3 %
598.1 %
598.1 %
332.2 %
ZIP
COMP
0.6 %
150.0 %
83702
HISPANIC
1.8%
7.2%
ZIP
BLACK
60016
60016
60018
60137
60191
60516
60521
60612
60616
60619
60630
60637
60646
60647
60647
60661
61104
61614
61820
62040
2.7 %
2.7 %
1.0 %
2.1 %
0.5 %
2.5 %
3.1 %
65.6 %
38.6 %
98.1 %
0.5 %
82.2 %
0.4 %
6.8 %
6.8 %
21.5 %
14.0 %
5.6 %
16.1 %
2.6 %
COMP
434.4 %
255.6 %
649.6 %
544.3 %
142.3 %
106.6 %
10.5 %
10.5 %
24.1 %
4.5 %
13.4 %
4.3 %
3.2 %
14.0 %
9.1 %
0.7 %
16.4 %
1.3 %
6.6 %
67.7 %
67.7 %
5.9 %
16.1 %
1.4 %
5.5 %
2.4 %
COMP
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
46219
11.4 %
135.7 %
HISPANIC
457.1 %
660.7 %
7.4 %
2.8 %
7.4 %
2.2 %
2.3 %
COMP
211.4 %
211.4 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
BLACK
COMP
2.3 %
109.5 %
HISPANIC
2.1%
2.8%
COMP
2.1 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
5.7%
7.0%
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
66101
66211
40.6 %
1.5 %
712.2 %
30.4 %
1.2 %
434.2 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
KENTUCKY
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
40202
40503
66.8 %
2.7 %
915.0 %
COMP
195.9 %
108.9 %
113.8 %
ZIP
BLACK
70002
70115
70115
70122
70806
71104
71111
6.0 %
51.0 %
51.0 %
73.2 %
45.1 %
27.1 %
23.9 %
HISPANIC
2.1 %
2.5 %
7.3%
1.5%
COMP
140.0 %
166.6 %
Black Population 32.5%
Hispanic Population 2.4%
LOUISIANA
COMP
156.9 %
156.9 %
225.2 %
138.7 %
HISPANIC
COMP
10.8 %
3.2 %
3.2 %
3.2 %
1.4 %
2.6 %
3.2 %
450.0 %
133.3 %
133.3 %
133.3 %
108.3 %
133.3 %
133.3 %
550.4 %
550.4 %
MAINE
130.8 %
04106
04330
04401
Black Population
Hispanic Population
INDIANA
38.4 %
4.0 %
55.5 %
4.5 %
4.9 %
HISPANIC
0.4%
7.9%
3.6 %
HISPANIC
46222
46241
46408
46635
46815
KANSAS
Black Population 15.1%
Hispanic Population 12.3%
ILLINOIS
COMP
52245
Black Population
Hispanic Population
BLACK
BLACK
IOWA
[ There are no independent facilities in this state. ]
IDAHO
[ continued ]
ZIP
ZIP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
HAWAII
INDIANA
ZIP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
BLACK
COMP
0.6 %
0.4 %
0.8 %
120.0 %
160.0 %
COMP
2.4 %
17
1.1 %
0.8 %
0.9 %
COMP
157.1 %
114.2 %
128.5 %
Black Population 27.9%
Hispanic Population 4.3%
MARYLAND
8.4%
3.5%
HISPANIC
0.5%
0.7%
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
20710
20740
70.9 %
15.5 %
254.1 %
12.9 %
5.6 %
300.0 %
130.2 %
MARYLAND
ZIP
BLACK
20740
20746
20747
20783
20785
20814
20850
20874
20877
20877
21117
21228
21236
21237
21740
15.5 %
87.1 %
89.9 %
39.3 %
84.0 %
3.4 %
10.1 %
17.0 %
17.7 %
17.7 %
24.9 %
17.6 %
6.0 %
16.3 %
11.0 %
COMP
312.1 %
322.2 %
140.8 %
301.0 %
MASSACHUSETTS
ZIP
01778
01830
01904
01960
02446
02446
02446
02703
MICHIGAN
[ continued ]
BLACK
HISPANIC
COMP
ZIP
BLACK
5.6 %
2.4 %
1.3 %
40.6 %
3.1 %
6.1 %
8.4 %
9.0 %
27.4 %
27.4 %
3.0 %
1.9 %
1.7 %
2.1 %
1.5 %
130.2 %
48906
48917
49120
49442
49503
49508
13.1 %
8.9 %
6.3 %
22.9 %
22.2 %
13.1 %
944.1 %
141.8 %
195.3 %
209.3 %
637.2 %
637.2 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
COMP
HISPANIC
0.7 %
2.8 %
3.2 %
1.0 %
2.4 %
2.4 %
2.4 %
1.6 %
[ continued ]
1.1 %
9.2 %
4.8 %
3.4 %
3.7
3.7
3.7
4.3 %
COMP
161.2 %
156.3 %
12.7 %
4.9 %
2.4 %
5.5 %
15.3 %
4.8 %
384.8 %
148.4 %
166.6 %
463.6 %
145.4 %
3.5%
2.9%
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
55101
55402
55404
55404
55422
55802
14.6 %
36.4 %
27.9 %
27.9 %
4.8 %
1.9 %
417.1 %
1040.0 %
797.1 %
797.1 %
137.1 %
9.8 %
2.8 %
15.6 %
15.6 %
2.0 %
0.9 %
337.9 %
COMP
ZIP
BLACK
39216
35.3 %
537.9 %
537.9 %
Black Population 36.3%
Hispanic Population 1.4%
MISSISSIPPI
135.2 %
COMP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
MINNESOTA
5.4%
6.8%
HISPANIC
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
0.5 %
Black Population 11.2%
Hispanic Population 2.1%
MISSOURI
[ There are no independent facilities in this state. ]
Black Population 14.2%
Hispanic Population 3.3%
MICHIGAN
ZIP
BLACK
48025
48075
48076
48093
48108
48126
48152
48185
48205
48219
48224
48235
48302
48310
48310
48312
48322
48346
48504
48603
3.8 %
70.7 %
42.1 %
1.5 %
16.8 %
1.4 %
1.4 %
6.2 %
84.4 %
85.0 %
79.2 %
96.3 %
6.0 %
1.2 %
1.2 %
1.7 %
6.5 %
1.1 %
66.7 %
5.4 %
COMP
497.8 %
296.4 %
118.3 %
594.3 %
598.5 %
557.7 %
678.1 %
469.7 %
HISPANIC
1.2 %
1.0 %
1.1 %
1.0 %
4.0 %
3.1 %
1.8 %
2.5 %
0.8 %
1.0 %
1.1 %
0.6 %
1.3 %
1.2 %
1.2 %
1.2 %
1.4 %
2.9 %
2.0 %
4.2 %
COMP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
MONTANA
ZIP
59047
59802
59901
121.2 %
BLACK
COMP
0.3 %
0.3 %
0.2 %
68005
Black Population
Hispanic Population
BLACK
COMP
6.3 %
157.5 %
89030
89074 *
127.2 %
COMP
5.1 %
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
18.9 %
277.9 %
62.9 %
319.2 %
* Statistics for this ZIP code were not available.
18
HISPANIC
4.0%
5.5%
Black Population 6.8%
Hispanic Population 19.7%
NEVADA
ZIP
COMP
1.9 %
1.8 %
1.4 %
NEBRASKA
ZIP
HISPANIC
0.3%
2.0%
NEVADA
ZIP
89104
89119
89169 *
89502
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
ZIP
BLACK
6.7 %
8.3 %
122.0 %
34.8 %
31.7 %
176.6 %
160.9 %
33.6 %
170.5 %
10001
10003
10013
10016
10017
10017
10017
10022
10023
10024
10128
10451
10455
10455
10457
10458
10461
10461
10605
10710
10950
11030
11101
11201
11201
11201
11232
11234
11237
11354
11364
11372
11372
11372
11372
11372
11373
11374
11375
11375
11417
11746
11787
11788
13057
13057
13851*
14214
14228
14618
14620
14620
9.8 %
4.4 %
4.8 %
5.2 %
3.4 %
3.4 %
3.4 %
1.2 %
5.5 %
5.9 %
4.9 %
46.1 %
27.6 %
27.6 %
36.2 %
23.2 %
4.9 %
4.9 %
7.7 %
10.9 %
1.7 %
1.2 %
25.2 %
20.7 %
20.7 %
20.7 %
6.0 %
38.8 %
10.1 %
4.4 %
2.0 %
2.9 %
2.9 %
2.9 %
2.9 %
2.9 %
2.0 %
2.6 %
2.5 %
2.5 %
4.1 %
6.8 %
0.7 %
1.3 %
1.2 %
1.2 %
2.5 %
NEW HAMPSHIRE
ZIP
03103
03301
03840
Black Population
Hispanic Population
BLACK
COMP
2.5 %
1.2 %
0.3 %
357.1 %
171.4 %
HISPANIC
6.9 %
1.5 %
0.7 %
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
07018
07024
07042
07052
07060
07083
07087
07095
07208
07306
07601
07631
07631
07631
07652
07657
07731
08002
08034
08043
08201
08540
08755
08816
08865
08873
90.9 %
1.7 %
43.5 %
17.4 %
34.6 %
15.5 %
3.6 %
8.1 %
19.0 %
15.9 %
24.6 %
39.0 %
39.0 %
39.0 %
1.1 %
0.8 %
3.7 %
5.5 %
3.8 %
8.0 %
11.3 %
4.8 %
2.7 %
2.8 %
2.2 %
28.3 %
668.3 %
4.1 %
7.9 %
5.7 %
10.0 %
29.9 %
9.3 %
75.3 %
9.8 %
42.7 %
29.0 %
25.9 %
21.8 %
21.8 %
21.8 %
4.9 %
13.8 %
5.7 %
3.5 %
2.7 %
2.5 %
6.3 %
4.3 %
4.3 %
4.2 %
3.7 %
8.8 %
319.8 %
127.9 %
254.4 %
113.9 %
139.7 %
116.9 %
180.8 %
286.7 %
286.7 %
286.7 %
208.3 %
87102
87102
87505
88008
COMP
405.8 %
COMP
224.8 %
566.1 %
321.0 %
218.0 %
194.7 %
163.9 %
163.9 %
163.9 %
103.7 %
Black Population 1.9%
Hispanic Population 42.1%
NEW MEXICO
ZIP
0.7%
1.7%
Black Population 13.6%
Hispanic Population 13.3%
NEW JERSEY
Black Population 15.9%
Hispanic Population 15.1%
NEW YORK
[ continued ]
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
4.2 %
4.2 %
0.7 %
1.0 %
221.0 %
221.0 %
68.8 %
68.8 %
52.5 %
73.6 %
163.4 %
163.4 %
124.7 %
174.8 %
37.5 %
5.7 %
2.3 %
14.1 %
14.1 %
* Statistics for this ZIP code were not available.
19
COMP
289.9 %
173.5 %
173.5 %
227.6 %
145.9 %
158.4 %
130.1 %
130.1 %
130.1 %
244.0 %
235.8 %
HISPANIC
COMP
20.1 %
7.6 %
4.7 %
7.9 %
5.4 %
5.4 %
5.4 %
4.8 %
8.3 %
11.1 %
8.7 %
55.0 %
74.7 %
74.7 %
61.9 %
58.8 %
26.0 %
26.0 %
11.9 %
11.2 %
5.5 %
3.4 %
35.7 %
14.4 %
14.4 %
14.4 %
64.0 %
7.0 %
79.6 %
18.9 %
7.7 %
56.4 %
56.4 %
56.4 %
56.4 %
56.4 %
43.1 %
13.1 %
10.2 %
10.2 %
28.1 %
12.7 %
3.4 %
4.7 %
1.0 %
1.0 %
133.1 %
2.8 %
1.8 %
1.7 %
5.1 %
5.1 %
364.2 %
494.7 %
494.7 %
409.9 %
389.4 %
172.1 %
172.1 %
236.4 %
423.8 %
527.1 %
125.1 %
373.5 %
373.5 %
373.5 %
373.5 %
373.5 %
285.4 %
186.0 %
NORTH CAROLINA
ZIP
BLACK
27262
27406
27407
27514
27606
27607
27609
28211
28211
28273
28306
28546
28801
21.1 %
53.1 %
25.2 %
9.2 %
13.3 %
11.0 %
14.9 %
12.1 %
12.1 %
28.5 %
24.6 %
24.5 %
44.8 %
COMP
HISPANIC
245.8 %
116.6 %
131.9 %
113.8 %
113.4 %
207.4 %
BLACK
COMP
0.8 %
133.3 %
58102
6.7 %
2.4 %
6.9 %
3.3 %
6.5 %
4.6 %
9.2 %
3.3 %
3.3 %
6.0 %
4.5 %
7.6 %
2.5 %
HISPANIC
1.3 %
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
43205
43214
43231
43604
43612
44109
44120
44304
45241
45324
45429
81.6 %
2.9 %
18.8 %
39.7 %
5.6 %
7.0 %
76.3 %
30.4 %
3.6 %
6.7 %
1.0 %
709.5 %
1.5 %
1.2 %
2.9 %
10.7 %
4.4 %
19.7 %
1.1 %
2.3 %
1.1 %
1.7 %
1.0 %
163.4 %
345.2 %
663.4 %
264.3 %
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
73069
73132
74135
3.2 %
13.8 %
6.6 %
181.5 %
15206
15206
15222
17110
18104
18109 *
19013
19106
19141
146.8 %
138.2 %
195.7 %
HISPANIC
4.9 %
5.7 %
5.7 %
BLACK
0.4 %
5.3 %
1.6 %
1.5 %
COMP
331.2 %
BLACK
COMP
51.2 %
51.2 %
24.8 %
35.5 %
1.6 %
512.0 %
512.0 %
248.0 %
355.0 %
1.5 %
1.5 %
1.1 %
3.8 %
2.7 %
75.8 %
6.3 %
83.3 %
758.0 %
5.2 %
2.9 %
2.5 %
HISPANIC
833.0 %
COMP
118.7 %
162.5 %
127.6 %
161.7 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
RHODE ISLAND
0.6%
1.2%
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
18.5 %
411.1 %
26.5 %
304.5 %
SOUTH CAROLINA
108.3 %
4.5%
8.7%
02905
COMP
Black Population 29.5%
Hispanic Population 2.4%
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
29407
29605
30.7 %
46.0 %
104.0 %
155.9 %
HISPANIC
COMP
1.6 %
2.3 %
COMP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
SOUTH DAKOTA
152.6 %
563.1 %
231.5 %
1036.8 %
COMP
109.6 %
109.6 %
15.4 %
5.1 %
3.0 %
3.9 %
192.5 %
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
COMP
37211
37620
37643
37916
37919
38104
38104
18.7 %
2.3 %
1.1 %
7.4 %
4.3 %
27.5 %
27.5 %
114.0 %
10.0 %
0.6 %
0.9 %
1.4 %
1.9 %
3.4 %
3.4 %
454.5 %
167.6 %
167.6 %
ZIP
BLACK
75205
75231
75235
75243
76108
76110
76542
1.6 %
27.2 %
9.9 %
33.9 %
4.3 %
4.8 %
25.8 %
* Statistics for this ZIP code were not available.
20
154.5 %
154.5 %
Black Population 11.5%
Hispanic Population 32.0%
TEXAS
1.6%
8.0%
COMP
Black Population 16.4%
Hispanic Population 2.2%
TENNESSEE
7.6%
5.2%
HISPANIC
0.6%
1.4%
[ There are no independent facilities in this state. ]
121.0 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
OREGON
97116
97205
97210
97401
142.5 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
OKLAHOMA
ZIP
ZIP
Black Population 11.5%
Hispanic Population 1.9%
OHIO
Black Population 10.0%
Hispanic Population 3.2%
PENNSYLVANIA
COMP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
NORTH DAKOTA
ZIP
Black Population 21.6%
Hispanic Population 4.7%
COMP
236.5 %
294.7 %
224.3 %
HISPANIC
6.2 %
40.5 %
70.3 %
14.4 %
12.6 %
62.8 %
14.8 %
COMP
126.5 %
219.6 %
196.2 %
TEXAS
VIRGINIA
[ continued ]
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
77002
77004
77008
77026
77057
77074
77074
77076
77090
77098
77401
77707
78212
78212
78222
78238
78240
78240
78404
78501
78550
78704
78750
78753
79902
79902
40.6 %
72.4 %
4.2 %
67.6 %
4.7 %
20.4 %
20.4 %
8.0 %
17.5 %
2.2 %
1.0 %
23.9 %
2.5 %
2.5 %
22.4 %
4.7 %
5.3 %
5.3 %
1.9 %
0.5 %
0.9 %
4.9 %
2.8 %
18.7 %
1.5 %
1.5 %
353.0 %
629.5 %
22.0 %
11.8 %
43.2 %
31.1 %
22.6 %
43.2 %
43.2 %
72.3 %
18.4 %
17.8 %
7.9 %
7.2 %
61.0 %
61.0 %
44.0 %
59.9 %
42.5 %
42.5 %
64.6 %
84.0 %
74.3 %
34.0 %
9.8 %
38.5 %
76.1 %
76.1 %
587.8 %
177.3 %
177.3 %
152.1 %
207.8 %
194.7 %
162.6 %
ZIP
COMP
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
135.0 %
23452
23502
23518
23601
24016
17.9 %
48.2 %
23.8 %
25.1 %
45.4 %
245.9 %
121.4 %
128.0 %
231.6 %
135.0 %
135.0 %
225.9 %
BLACK
COMP
HISPANIC
1.1 %
3.4 %
0.5 %
137.5 %
425.0 %
8.9 %
23.1 %
3.6 %
84107
84111
84124
BLACK
COMP
10.5 %
20.0 %
1.9 %
25.0 %
25.0 %
21.7 %
11.2 %
328.1 %
625.0 %
0.8%
9.0%
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
25302
25304
13.3 %
6.5 %
415.6 %
203.1 %
ZIP
53202
54301
54303
256.6 %
0.5%
0.9%
ZIP
83001
COMP
8.8 %
3.9 %
1.7 %
154.3 %
BLACK
0.5 %
1.0 %
HISPANIC
3.4 %
5.2 %
3.6 %
142.8 %
COMP
HISPANIC
8.1 %
5.7%
3.6%
COMP
144.4 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
0.2 %
3.2%
0.7%
COMP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
WYOMING
[ There are no independent facilities in this state. ]
5.1 %
7.2 %
3.0 %
6.9 %
6.9 %
6.0 %
6.9 %
HISPANIC
BLACK
3.2%
7.5%
COMP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
WISCONSIN
COMP
COMP
4.3 %
3.2 %
4.1 %
2.9 %
2.4 %
HISPANIC
781.2 %
781.2 %
678.1 %
350.0 %
WEST VIRGINIA
120.3 %
237.8 %
237.8 %
Black Population
Hispanic Population
VERMONT
98057 *
98101
98104
98115
98122
98122
98405
98418
190.6 %
190.6 %
137.5 %
187.1 %
132.8 %
132.8 %
201.8 %
262.5 %
232.1 %
106.2 %
HISPANIC
Black Population
Hispanic Population
WASHINGTON
ZIP
Black Population
Hispanic Population
UTAH
[ continued ]
0.8%
6.4%
COMP
126.5 %
Black Population 19.6%
Hispanic Population 4.7%
VIRGINIA
ZIP
BLACK
20110
22030
22031
22046
22304
22314
22901
23220
23229
12.4 %
7.5 %
5.5 %
3.3 %
24.4 %
22.4 %
11.6 %
44.6 %
5.0 %
COMP
124.4 %
114.2 %
227.5 %
HISPANIC
COMP
14.2 %
9.7 %
13.8 %
10.8 %
15.0 %
5.1 %
3.1 %
1.9 %
1.9 %
302.1 %
206.3 %
293.6 %
229.7 %
319.1 %
108.5 %
WASHINGTON, DC
ZIP
BLACK
COMP
20020
20032
20037
96.5 %
97.0 %
7.1 %
160.8 %
161.6 %
* Statistics for this ZIP code were not available.
21
Black Population 60.0%
Hispanic Population 7.9%
HISPANIC
0.9 %
0.8 %
5.6 %
COMP
Analysis & Conclusion
What we now know – and have documented – is that
there is not one state in the union without population
control centers located in ZIP codes with higher
percentages of blacks and/or Hispanics than the
state’s overall percentage. In fact, Hawaii is the only
state that does not have facilities located in ZIP
codes exceeding 125% of their overall percentage.
It is important to remember that every time there is a
figure in the “COMP” column, that figure represents
a population control facility in a ZIP code that is
disproportionately black, disproportionately Hispanic
or, in many cases, both.
The fact is that even a cursory scan of those columns
takes the allegations of racial targeting made in
Maafa 21 and transforms them into an observable
and undeniable reality.
Not only is this racial targeting widespread, it’s scale
is often enormous. We found 42 states with family
planning facilities in ZIP codes where the black
and/or Hispanic populations exceeds 200% of the
state’s overall percentage. More telling is that these
percentages routinely go far beyond even this level.
Numerous states have facilities in ZIP codes that
range from 250% to well over 1,000% and it is not
uncommon for them to have facilities located in
many such ZIP codes.
The numbers are staggering. As just one example,
consider Texas which has 94 Zip codes with at least
one population control facility. Of those, only 22 are
not disproportionately black and/or Hispanic.
As the charts demonstrate, similar patterns are found
across the country and they do not vary appreciably
by the size of the state. In Connecticut – a state
thoroughly dissimilar from Texas in size, culture and
geography – there are 21 Zip codes in which
population control facilities are located and only six
are not disproportionately black and/or Hispanic.
In the end, this data speaks for itself and does not
require a lot of analysis. The numbers make it clear
that the African-American and Hispanic communities
have been targeted and logic makes it clear that this
did not happen coincidentally or unintentionally.
It should also be noted that this eugenics effort is
being funded with taxpayer money. Currently,
Planned Parenthood alone receives approximately
one million dollars a day from the federal government
plus an unknown amount in state and local funds.
Moreover, this has been going on for decades.
It is also important to note the number of times there
are multiple facilities in disproportionately minority
ZIP codes. For example, in New Jersey, ZIP code
07631 has a black population 286.7% of the state’s
overall percentage and a Hispanic population
163.9% of the state. That ZIP code alone has four
population control facilities. Similarly, Minnesota ZIP
code 55404 has a black population that is 797.1% of
the overall state percentage and a Hispanic
population 537.9% of the state. In that ZIP code
there are three population control centers.
For years, there have been those within the American
political system who have taken action to address
the disproportionate treatment of minorities. Earlier,
this issue was raised in the context of alcohol and
tobacco marketing but, make no mistake, it exists in
many other parts of our culture as well.
Again, this pattern is repeated in state after state.
We identified 116 ZIP codes with more than one
population control facility. Of those, 84 were
disproportionately black and/or Hispanic. What this
means is that, when the American family planning
industry places multiple facilities in a ZIP code, that
ZIP code is more than two-and-a-half times as likely
to be disproportionately minority as not.
Now, this report validates the revelations contained
in Maafa 21 to create a new challenge. The question
becomes whether the political leaders who have so
righteously spoken out against these other injustices,
will remain silent in the face of this one. Should that
be their decision, they will surrender their credibility
and lose the right to ever again be outraged.
22
Maafa 21 Information
This 2-hour and 17-minute documentary
is available on DVD for $20 including shipping.
To place an order, call toll-free or go online.
1 | 800 | 800-5433
Maafa21.com
This website also features a short trailer
of the film plus comments from
previous viewers.
For additional information, call
940 | 380-8800
Copyright 2011
Life Dynamics Incorporated
Post Office Box 2226
Denton, Texas
76202
940 | 380-8800
This report was funded by the supporters
of Life Dynamics Incorporated.
Life Dynamics Incorporated is a
501(c)(3) corporation and
donations may be
tax deductible.