Express Mail Delivery

Airborne Strategic Managment Case Study (Harvard Business Case)
View more...
   EMBED

Share

Preview only show first 6 pages with water mark for full document please download

Transcript

Express Mail Delivery 1.How and why has the express mail industry structure evolved in recent years? Customers - Business and individuals became accustomed to express delivery services to ship their mosturgent documents, parcels and perishable goods. From a customer point of view, the urgency of shipment and competitive prices were the major drivers in using express mail instead of normal delivery.As the concept of inventory control became critical for businesses, they used express delivery to shiptheir time-sensitive products, thereby reducing their on hand inventory. The reliability of express mailcarriers, access to tracking information and the convenience of drop-off, also affected how industryevolved. Although not effective, volume discounts were offered to large customers to improve customer loyalty. Operations - Quality control became paramount to express mail industry, as the three largest carriers,delivered more than five million packages each day, with an over 98% on-time arrival. Although eachcarrier had different operational structure, their basic infrastructures were the same. They all utilizedlarge fleet of vehicles and drivers to collect packages from customers, and then transported by cargo planes to hub airports, where the package were trucked to hangers to be sorted according to their finaldestination and scheduled time of delivery. Even though carriers used different degree of automatedsorting processes, they all employed a vast number of employees to direct this process. Because of thenature of hubs’ operations, it required large capital expenditures. A significant portion of carriers’resources were also allocated to customer service and information management. In order to helpcustomers schedule pickups, track packages and provide rate information, complex information systemswere used to support the carriers’ distribution network. Competition - 85% of the domestic market was captured by the three major firms, FedEx, UPS andAirborne Express, with 1996 revenues of $10,274M, $22,368M, and $2,484M, respectively. The market position of second-tier players, which included U.S. Postal Service, was minute compared to FedEx andUPS combined. The Postal Services had remained popular among residential consumers, and had a legalmonopoly for mailing first-class letters; however it was prohibited by law to provide volume discountsto business customers. In addition, it lacked efficient tracking capabilities and had poor on-time deliveryrecord. Other second-tier players were DHL and TNT, BAX Global, Emery and RPS. DHL and TNT both targeted the international market. DHL’s purpose to operate domestically was merely to lower itscosts and increase reliability of its international shipments. And TNT was specifically targeting the European market. BAX Global and Emery were not competitive in overnight express mail and only focused on shipping heavy cargos. RPS was more focused in targeting price sensitive business customers who were interested ground two-day shipping.2. How have the changes affected small competitors? Smaller competitors were forced to intensify their product differentiation and become more appealing to niche markets within the express mail industry. They also utilized technology based customer service information systems to improve their customer service. 2.) Porter’s Five Forces Rating Threat of New Entrants Low Threat of Buyer Power High Threat of Substitute Products/Services High Intensity of Rivalry Moderate Threat of Supplier Power Moderate Description Due to the current oligopoly of 86% shared by FedEx, UPS, and Airborne, as well as the large capital investment required of new entrants; threat of new entrants is not an impending concern of the top tier organizations. Moreover, the domestic express mail market is very saturated, and there are not many ways in which to differentiate your product from the existing postal service “gorillas”. Buyer power is high due to the low experienced switching costs and product differentiation, as well as the several suppliers a consumer has to choose from. Further, post-UPS’s strike Roadway Package System’s president Ivan Hofmann noted: “Single-sourcing as a buzzword lost its buzz” (14), reiterating the fact that the customer has the power. Express mail providers offer a convenient service; nonetheless convenience is not a necessity. Threat of substitute products/ services is high due to the availability of several alternatives (e.g. Telephone, Bus Transport, email, Facsimile, Skype, etc.) Intensity of rivalry is moderate; this is due to the evident oligopoly between FedEx, UPS, and Airborne. This “parcel war” has few major competitors, and buyers have low switching costs. Moreover, UPS operates in each market segment; therefore there is no way to differentiate your product from that of this preexisting premier company. The power of the supplier is neither high nor low, seeing as the top three domestic express mail providers have little dependence on their suppliers with some bargaining power. A few of these head organizations own their own planes as well as a portion of their delivery vehicles, while Airborne Express owns their own airport thus, decreasing the suppliers power.