Mers V Cabrera Transcript 16 Sep 2005 Part 1

This is Part 1 of a 2 part document containing the transcript of the hearing relating to the case MERS v. Cabrera before Judge Jon Gordon, of the 11th Judicial District, Miami-Dade County, Florida, on September 16, 2005. The case MERS v. Cabrera was a key early MERS case later reversed by the Florida Court of Appeals in MERS v. Revordo. This case is one of those discussed within the Baker & Hostetler LLP Report to the Fannie Mae Board investigating Nye Lavalle's complaints.
View more...
   EMBED

Share

Preview only show first 6 pages with water mark for full document please download

Transcript

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ENZO CABRERA, et aI., Defendants. _____________________________ 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 05-02425 CA 05 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS Plaintiff, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, mc., hereby gives notice of " filing the attached September 16, 2005 transcript of the hearing on the COl,-rected Order to Show Cause. \ Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Counsel for MERS 5300 Wachovia Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131-2339 Telephone: 305.415.3456 Facsimile: 305.415.3001 Robert M. Brochin Florida Bar No. 0319661 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of PIa in tiff:;'Jjotice of Filing Transcript of Proceedings was served via U.S. Mail on 2005, to each of the parties listed on the attached Service List. Robert M. Brochin J-MI/562038.1 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCK IUS LLP • SERVICE LIST MERS v. Enzo Cabrera, et al. Case No. OS-0242S-CA OS Stacey Rosenthal, Esq. Law Offices of David J. Stem, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 801 S. University Drive, Suite 500 Plantation, Florida 33324 Enzo Cabrera Unknown Spouse of Enzo Cabrera ProSe 3791 SW 139 Court Miami, Florida 33186 Diana Paez-Ramos, Esq. Attorney for Three Lakes Property Owners Association, Inc. 201 Alhambra Circle, Suite 603 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Mimi N. Vu, Esq. Attorney for MERS as Nominee for Fremont Investment & Loan 9204 King Palm Drive Tampa, Florida 33619 John Doe nJkla Harvey Rothchild Jane Doe nlkla Maria Rothchild 1732 SW 132nd Place Miami, Florida 33186 Jorge Gonzalez, Esq. Attorney for Debtor(sj 321 Palm Avenue Hialeah, Florida 33010 I-MII561468.1 Page 1 of 1 \ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, F L O R ~ D A GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO. 05-2425 CA 05 05-10022 CA 05 05-11350 CA 05 05-11570 CA 05 05-12227 CA 05 05-12531 CA 05 05-14401 CA 05 05-14911 CA 05 05-15138 CA 05 10 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, vs. ENZO CABRERA, et al., Defendants. _______________________________ 1 Miami-Dade County Courthouse 73 West Flagler Street 4th Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Friday, September 16, 2005 1:30 p.m. 22 The above-entitled cause came on for hearing 23 before the Honorable Jon Gordon, Circuit Court Judge 24 pursuant to Notice. 25 VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 1 APPEARANCES: 2 MORGAN, 'LEWIS I BY: ROBERT BROCHIN', ESQ. 3 200 So'uth Biscayne Boulevard Suite 5300' 4 Miami, Fl'orida 33131 on behalf of MERS. 5 AKERMAN, SENTERFITT 6 BY: VJI,IrLIAM HELLER, ESQ. 350 East Las Olas Boulevard 7 'Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 8 on behalf of Countrywide. 9 SHARON HORSTKAMP 1595 Spring Hill Road 10 Suite 310' Vienna, VA 22182 11 ELIZABETH WELLBORN, ESQ 12 BARRY MARCUS, ESQ. ~ 13 DONNA GLICK, ESQ. and DONNA EVERTZ, ESQ. \, 14 on behalf of U.S. Bank National Associates. 15 CARLOS ENRIQUEZ, ESQ. on behalf of the Estate of Jose Martinez. 16 MARISdL MORALES, ESQ. 17 on behalf of MERS. 18 19 Court 20 No. 1 21 22 23 24 25 E X H I BIT S Description Page Binder VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 13 2 1 THE COURT: Thank you. Please be seated. 2 A lot of people here. Why d0n't I first start 3 off by asking you please to make your 4 appearances. 5 Yes, sir. 6 MR. BROCHIN: Good afternoon, Your Honor. 7 Bobby Brochin, Morgan, Lewis and Bockius on 8 behalf of MERS. 9 THE COURT: Thank you. 10 Is there -- 11 MR. BROCHIN: I will introd¥ce Sharon 12 Horstkamp who is general counsel from MERS·who's i3 sitting here. , 14 THE COURT: I'm sorry, your name, please, 15 ma'am. 16 MS. HORSTKAMP: Sharon Horstkamp, Your 17 Honor. I'm general counsel with MERS. 18 THE COURT: Okay. Yes, sir. 19 MR. HELLER: Judge, good afternoon. Bill 20 Heller from Akerman, Senterfitt with Countrywide 21 Home Loans in the Spencer Gordon case, 12531. 22 THE COURT: Thank you. Okay. I received 23 your memo yesterday at 4:30. Did you say your 24 name was Housecamp (phonetic)? 25 MS. HORSTKAMP: Horstkamp, Your Honor. VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 3' 1 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. Are there any '2 other lawyers here representing any of these 3 other defendants? Did you all want to make your 4 appearanc'es? You're welcome to come up here. 5 Yes, ma'am. 6 MS. GLICK: Good afternoon, Your Honor, 7 1 '1 Glick on behalf of -- actually we would' 8 'like to enter a notice of appearance on the 9 Cabrera case on behalf of U.S. Bank National 10 Association as trustee. We'd like to enter an t ' 11 appearance as the assignee of We would 12 like to file a motion to replead,'to 13 THE COURT: To what? I' \ 14 MS. GLICK: To replead, to bring the action 15 in the name of U.S. Bank National Association as 16 trustee. The holder of the note. " 17 THE COURT: It's a motion to amend. 18 MS. GLICK: Yes, Your Honor. 19 THE COURT: I'm reserving on motions to 20 amend. You're welcome, if you believe yourself 21 to be a party, to sit at table. 22 Yes, ma'am. 23 MS. MORALES: Good afternoon, Your Honor, 24 Marisol Morales appearing from the law firm of 25 Ben-Ezra & Katz in the case of Mortgage VeritextlFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 4 " 5' 1 Electronic versus Revoredo, Case Number 05-115'70. I 2 I THE COURT: I'm sorry, who did you say you I 3 represented? 4 MS. MORALES: I also represent MERS. 5 THE COURT: Okay. 6 MS. MORALES: I'm from the law firm of 7 Ben-Ezra & Katz. 8 THE COURT: Okay. All right. 9 MS. MORALES: I'm one of the law firms that 10 was ordered to show cause. 11 THE COURT: Yes, ma'am. You're here I guess 12 ... as co-counsel then with the other 'counsel.' MS. MORALES: Yes, Your Honor. ~ \ 14 THE COURT: You're welcome, ma'am, if you 15 wish, to sit at the table, whatever your 16 pleasure. 17 MS. MORALES: Thank you. 18 THE COURT: Yes, sir. 19 MR. MARCUS: Good afternoon, Your Honor. 20 I'm Barry Marcus from Marshall Watson. 21 THE COURT: Yes. 22 MR. MARCUS: We actually were noticed for 23 four cases this afternoon. 24 25 THE COURT: Yes, sir. MR. MARCUS: And just so -- to address the Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 -:::::t- -------- . ...,., .:;;z. :::3 A: !3 6 '/ e 9 ::1-0 ::J.-:1- ::J.:;Z :::t-:3 :::t-A: ::1- S :1- 6 :1-'1 :1- 8 :1- 9 ;ZO 24 2.0 court to make them aware that three of the cases already been dismissed. So I only have one case before Your Honor. THE 'COURT: I know that some had been. I believe I'm here on consolidated cases 05-2425, 05-10022, 05-11350, 05-11570, 05-12531, 05-14401, and 05-15138. I know there were some voluntary dismissals. Are any of these that I identified voluntary dismissals? f • MR. MARCUS: Honor, there's a voluntary "- dismissal issue on 05-11 -- I'm sorry 05-0 -- 05-10022, 05-11350. I'm sorry I that was the onl y \ I· one that's actually still open. 05-11350 is still open. 05-14401 there's a voluntary dismissal entered. 05-14911 there's also a 1\ voluntary dismissal issued. Those four cases are ours. THE COURT: What I then have apparently pending is 05-2425, 05-11570, 05-12531 and 05-15138. MS. WELLBORN: Correct. THE COURT: All right. The court does retain jurisdiction pending the disposition of the pending matter. Voluntary dismissals VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 6 1 notwithstanding at this point. Those which have 2 been previously dismissed so,be it. 3 Hi, Your Honor. You're welcome to 4 JUDGE GENDEN: I'll sit over here. 5 THE COURT: Okay. Give Judge Genden one of , 6 these. 7 Yes. 8 MS. WELLBORN: Good afternoon, Your Honor, 9 I'm here making an appearance in case 05-15138. 10 THE COURT: Yes, ma'am. 11 MS. WELLBORN: And 05-12531 on behalf of the "- 12 Cheveria and Associates, and the two Mortgagee 13 Electronic Registration in those c a s ~ s . \ 14 THE COURT: Whoa, you went too fast, too 15 slow for me. I didn't catch the rest of it. 16 MS. WELLBORN: I'm here on behalf of the 17 Cheveria and Associates in those two cases that I 18 mentioned, Your Honor. 19 THE COURT: I got the 15138. 20 MS. WELLBORN: Okay. And the other one was 21 05-12531 Mortgagee Electronic versus Gordon. 22 THE COURT: Okay. You're welcome, counsel, 23 to sit up here as well. 24 THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry, what was 25 your name? VeritextlFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 1 , ' 1 MR. WELLBORN: Elizabeth Wellborn. '2 TRE COURT: Okay. 3 MR. ENRIQUEZ: Good afternoon, Your Honor. 4 My name is Carlos Enriquez and I'm here on the , 5 case counsel just cited, opposing counsel, 6 05-15138. I I represent the Estate of Jose 7 I I I Martinez. 8 THE COURT: Counsel, thank you for being 9 he.re. 10 I have given a great deal of thought to how 11 we all should with this It has 12 come before the court or the court has brought it 13 before me on the Corrected Order to Show Cause. \ 14 I did review your memorandum of law. , This is the 15 evidentiary hearing. This is the hearing on the 16 Order Show Cause why these cases and similar 17 cases not to be dismissed as a sham and/or 18 as a frivolous pleading. The cases that I 19 selected here on the Order to Show Cause were 20 frankly simple random cases in my division. 21 These were not selected with any particular 22 purpose other than as a happen to come before my 23 desk. 24 Let's start by discussing some of the things 25 that have come to the court's attention. And I Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 8 " ~ ___________ r ' ~ ______________________ ~ , 1 made some notes on this and let me just share 2 them with you and then we will proceed hopefully I 3 in due course. I made notes on one of the cases 4 or several of them,. Case Number 05-15138 which 5 is still pending. That's filed by the 6 Cheveria -- am I pronouncing that correctly? 7 MS. WELLBORN: Yes, sir. 8 THE COURT: I see that this is a case -- is 9 this on? My voice is going. 10 I see that this is a case filed by MERS as a 11 nominee on behalf of Washington Mutual Bank. The \ 12 lender is GN Mortgage Corporation: In Paragraph 4 of the complaint MERS as nominee claims that it \ 14 is the holder and the owner of the note. The 15 note which is attached obviously does not 16 reflect -- I don't believe there's a note 17 attached to that. There also is attached to the 18 complaint a notice of debt collection. The 19 notice indicates that unless the defendants do 20 something within 30 days they will proceed, 21 although the summons of course is 20 days. 22 In Case Number 05-14401 filed by the Watson 23 firm MERS is nominee for Aurora Loan Services, 24 Inc. is bringing the action. The lender is 25 Finance America, LLC. Count I to reestablish the VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 9' 1 note alleges that the plaintiff is the owner of '2 the note and the plaintiff wa's in possession when 3 lost. 4 Courit IV alleges -- strike that. , 5 Count II, Paragraph 11 alleges that the 6 plaintiff 'Owns and holds the note. MERS is sued 7 as a detendant nominee for Financial America,' so 8 they are both the plaintiff and the defendant in 9 the same lawsuit. 10 Case 05-11350 filed by the Watson firm. 11 MERS lbrings the a c t ~ o n as nominee for GMAC Corp. , 12 The lender is Impac Funding Corporation d/b/a 13 Impac Lending Corporation. Count I to \ I' 14 reestablish the note, Paragraph 3 alleges that 15 the plaintiff is the owner of the note. 16 Cs:mnt II for foreclosure alleges that the 17 plaintiff owns and holds the note. 18 Count -- Paragraph 20 alleges that MERS as 19 nominee for Impac is sued as the defendant. 20 So again you have the plaintiff suing itself 21 as the defendant. 22 Paragraph 2 of the complaint alleges that 23 the borrower delivered to MERS as nominee for 24 Impac a promissory note. That's all in the 25 complaint. VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 a 1Q 11' 1 There's an answer filed by the same law firm I 2 on behalf of the defendant in which it denies 3 knowledge of the allegations in Paragraph 1. ' 4 Paragraph 1 MERS answer asserts that it's 5 without knowledge to the allegations filed in the, 6 complaint. 7 Paragraph 10 of the complaint alleges that 8 the borrower delivered the note and the mortgage 9 to MERS as nominee for Impac. 10 Paragraph 2 of the answer says it's without 11 By the same law firm. , Plaintiff and knowledge. 12 defendant. , 13 In Case 05-1227 -- I think I g o ~ all the \ 14 twos in there. 12227 MERS files a lawsuit as 15 nominee for Countrywide Home Loans, the lender is 16 Quick Loans, Inc. MERS as nominee for Quick is 17 joined as a defendant. In that case I never 18 found any service of process. 19 Paragraph 2 the plaintiff alleges as agent 20 of the server it is the present owner and 21 constructive holder of the promissory note and 22 mortgage. 23 Paragraph 20 alleges plaintiff is the 24 agent -- plaintiff as agent became the holder. 25 Case Number 05-12531. This was the one VeritextIFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 1 that the court granted the order on rehearing '2 having'su,a sponte previously 'dismissed the action 3 believing that it was appropriate as no hearing 4 on the matter and the court thought we were 5 without a was appropriate. 6 MERS 'as nominee for Countrywide Home Loans 7 br,ings 'the lawsuit. The lender 1s Countrywide 8 Home Loans. Attached to the complaint is one of 9 the fair debt notice collection things of 30 10 days. The plaintiff now alleges that it owns and ; holds the note. The plaintiff is MERS as 11 12 nominee. , 13 Case 05-2425 the Office of Daviq Stern. I, \ 14 MERS is the plaintiff in its own right. It's not 15 suing as nominee. The lender is Fremont 16 Investment and Loan. " 17 Paragraph 5 says the plaintiff owns and 18 holds the note and mortgage. There's a fair debt 19 collection notice. 20 Paragraph 17 joins MERS as a nominee for 21 Fremont. It answers the complaint and admits 22 that it may have an interest in the property. 23 Case Number 05-14911 filed by the Watson 24 firm. MERS is nominee of GMAC Mortgage. The 25 lender is Popular Mortgage. VeritextlFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 12 1 Paragraph 3. The plaintiff owns -- is the 2 owner of the'note. 3 Paragraph 19 joins MERS as a nominee 4 defendant for Mortgage. Both the 5 plaintiff and defendant again. 6 Case number 05-11570. MERS is nominee for 7 Accredited Home Lenders, Inc. The lender is 8 Accredited Home Lenders, Inc. 9 Paragraph 10 alleges MERS may have an 10 interest. There's a notice of fair credit. MERS 11 was defaulted by the clerk in case. The .. 12 plaintiff defaulted itself in the 'case. The 13 original note was filed. ·14 There's something terribly wrong here, 15 folks. There's something wrong here. If this 16 doesn't red flag a significant problem nothing 17 does. I notice in your memorandum of law, 18 counsel, that you made reference to your 19 website. The court will take judicial notice of 20 that site and the documents therein contained and 21 in that light the court will ask the clerk to 22 mark that volume there as Court's Exhibit 1 which 23 are copies of the website material. 24 And, counsel, if you like, please, why don't 25 you take a copy for your reference and we will go VeritextlFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 13' 1 through some of these documents. Those can '2 remain'there unless, some other person feels a 3 need to have a copy for the moment. If not, then 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 so be it.' So the issue before the court, counsel, as I see it is does the plaintiff have legal standing I I j to foreclose on these mortgages and to reestablish the notes in question, or the allegations that the plaintiff owns and holds the note, that they were entitled to enforce the note when 'the loss of occurred, that they directly or indirectly acquired owpership in the instrument from a person who was encitled to " it from the loss of possessiorl and that the loss of possession was not the result of a and that they had a right to enforce the 17 instrument. All these allegations as set forth 18 in each of these complaints. And the question 19 before the court is on the motion -- on the 20 court's motion to dismiss as a sham is has the 21 plaintiff made these allegations knowing them to 22 be false from the plain and received facts in the 23 case. 24 Before, counsel, I invite you to respond, I 25 want to, if I might, direct your attention to the Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 14 II' ( ( 1 folder that I have provided to you which I have 2 marked as C o ~ r t ' s Exhibit --,Composite Exhibit . I 3 1. If I can invite your attention, please, to 4 Number 16, the las,t one. On your website there 5 are posted inquiries and responses and these are 6 some of the inquiries and responses that have 7 been made. And then I'm going to ask you, 8 please, for your position. 9 And in fact a number of these responses were 10 made by you Ms. Horstkamp, correct? 11 12 yes. 13 MS. HORSTKAMP: That's correct, Your Honor, , THE COURT: '" . And perhaps you can\glve the 14 court some insight. Looking first to the inquiry 15 of September 23, 2003 by a Ms. -- I believe it's 16 Ms. Nye. N-Y-E. 17 MR. BROCHIN: Wait a minute, Your Honor, 18 where is that? 19 THE COURT: Okay. Let me give you a moment, 20 please. It's towards 21 MR. BROCHIN: Is there a page? 22 THE COURT: No, I didn't number it. It's 23 under Tab 16 and it is -- the most recent is on 24 the top and the older is below so if you take a 25 moment to look at the September 23rd inquiry. Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 15' 1 MR. BROCHIN: 2003? '2 THE COURT: Do you have 'it? Okay. 3 MR. BROCHIN: 2003? 4 THE 'COURT: Right. Let's read it. The memo 5 from her says: Can you explain to us how 6 hundreds o'f millions of dollars of promissory , .!. '- 7 notes 1n the State of Florida are being lost,' 8 st6len or destroyed and how such notes are being 9 accounted for on the books of the various 10 investors such as Fannie Mae, Freddie and various 1 11 trusts? 12 In light of the recent events, it begs the 13 question if notes, mortgage,s and othe, documents I' 14 (assignments in particular) securing,loan 15 indebtedness that are not being recorded or being 16 p o s t e ~ , or predated to allow various accounting 17 treatments. 18 Another question we've had posed to us by 19 members of the media is could notes be 20 cross-collateralized as part of different loan 21 pools or are delays in payoffs of such loans 22 being held back to smooth out earnings or 23 prepayments so as not to accept the assumption 24 affect the assumptions being used to value the 25 MSRs of various owners and members of the VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 Hi 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I 13 \ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 organization. I How can you explain the'plethora of missing I notes that representatives of your organization attest in affidavits are being lost, stolen or 11 destroyed. If destroyed, how and why and how can, we assure investors in mutual funds, corporations and pension funds who are investing in these MBS products why the perfected collateral securing such investments are being lost, stolen or destroyed? We are at loss here as to why is MERS \ covered up and allowing such af'nidavits td be signed under its corporate seal and name. \ Your response. This response is limit,ed only to the questions asked that deal directly with MERS' role as a mortgage industry. There's always a recorded document (mortgage or assignment) naming MERS as the mortgagee in the applicable county land records. Notes are not recordable documents. Once MERS becomes the recorded mortgagee, if the mortgage lien remains with MERS, there are no assignments to record, but if the mortgage lien leaves MERS, then there's also a recorded assignment from MERS to the new mortgage lien holder. VeritextlFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 1 If you're looking for specific loan '2 information on a mortgage for' which MERS holds 3 the mortgage lien in the land records, you may 4 call our 'service information system number I , 5 guess (888) 679-6377. The number operates seven 6 days a week, etcetera . 7 .,JT I t rter response to you was. Nb, Sharon, I 'want 8 to know why all your lawyers and those of your 9 cohorts are filing false affidavits in Florida 10 courts with all the tight controls of document 11 custody (see Fannie ,and Freddie guidelines as " 12 well as your own foreclosure guide for the 13 state). I want to know why affidavits being \ , 14 signed by servicers in your name claim no one 15 else has beneficial rights to mortgage. 16 17 holders being shielded. Why? liability perhaps. Postdating or 18 later dating of notes on the books (when are 19 investors taking notes off the books?). How many 20 are claiming the note on the books? We have seen 21 cases where three different parties are claiming 22 ownership of the note. 23 How could three parties all own the same 24 note unless they have some little piece, but they 25 are all claiming the same amount. VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 1 You may want to study the Florida RICO law. 2 It may prove'useful to you in your upcoming 3 depositions and perhaps when you have to explain 4 yourself and your pusiness to government 5 regulators, AGS and USDOJ. I don't know what 6 that is. Much luck. Hey, and will you answer my 7 question on here for all to see? 8 It doesn't appear they gave a response. 9 Another memo of particular interest is the 10 one of September 23rd and it is the one following 11 the one from counsel by the same individual. 12 The question is: Does MERS' (not the 'server, \. 13 trust, SPV, REMIC, or any holder of.pledged , 14 securities, pools, notes, mortgages, ~ t c e t e r a ) 15 ever have as an organization, not as a nominee 16 for another party, entity, a beneficial interest 17 in the mortgage, promissory note, deed of trust 18 or other document securing the loan on a 19 property? 20 Your response. MERS holds the mortgage lien 21 as mortgagee in an agency capacity for the 22 mortgage lender, its successors and assigns. 23 This occurs either through a recorded mortgage in 24 which the borrower names MERS as the mortgagee or 25 through a recorded assignment. The borrower, by VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 19 1 signing the mortgage document, acknowledges that '2 MERS h6lds a legal ~ n t e r e s t ih their mortgage. I 3 Her response. Mortgages are typically used 4 and are foreclosed judicially. MERS local , 5 counsel advises that a loan can be foreclosed in 6 the name of MERS. When MERS has been assigned 7 I I I I the mortgage, the caption of the complaint sHould I " 8 state Mortgage Electronics. However, this 9 changes slightly if MERS is the original 10 mortgagee, et cetera. MERS stands in the same I ' 11 shoes as the servicer. An investor, typically a 12 secondary market investor, will be the ultimate 13 owner of the note. 14 F;llowing down without reading tAe entire 15 thing. There is much fraud in the mortgage 16 servicJng and banking industry as evidenced by 17 recent headlines from predatory lending to 18 Fairbanks and Freddie. 19 Therefore, attention should be paid by all 20 to red flags for fraud which include missing or 21 lost documentation as stated in many industry 22 guidelines but especially in the OTS and oee 23 guidelines -- guides and audit manuals. 24 You still have not answered my question 25 regarding all the affidavits in the many cases VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 20 - 21' 1 you have filed in Florida claiming to be the only I 2 holder of a beneficial interest in a note with no 3 one having a claim and that the aforesaid note 4 was lost, stolen o ~ destroyed which defies all 5 logic and raises huge red flags for the entire 6 industry. Why? Simple questions and should be a 7 simple answer. 8 Finally the memo of September 23. Actually I 9 I think that's the one I just read. The other 10 one that caught had my eye was the memo of 11 September 26, 2003. 12 13 Why does MERS' name appear on so many· lost \ '} note affidavits in the State of F l o r l ~ a ? Florida 14 is a judicial foreclosure state. Note/Mortgage 15 to be made part of the foreclosure filing. Yet, 16 mysteriously, negotiable paper endorsed in blank 17 being lost, stolen or destroyed. How? Explain. 18 As having investments in the Fannie and 19 Freddie, I want to know where these notes are, 20 especially in light of the stringent document 21 custody procedures put in place. Are you not 22 concerned about the filing of potentially many 23 false affidavits under your name? Examine your 24 own foreclosure manuals for Florida and reconcile 25 the fact that you don't have a beneficial VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 1 interest in the note, yet so many affidavits '2 claim y o ~ do. Why ,are you hiaing the names of 3 the investors? How are these notes being booked 4 and on which entities' balance sheet? Are , 5 implicit or implied recourse agreements occurring 6 that are invalidating the true sale nature of the j I j L_ 7 MBS transactions? Why can't borLowers learn 'from 8 you who has custody of their note and what the 9 chain of assignments to that note were on your 10 system? Answer the questions for all to see. j 11 No response. 12 Perhaps the final one is. The one by 13 dated January 15, 2003. By Madeline .. Pew. P-E-W. r \ 14 It says as follows: I was recently told that the 15 manner in which our firm was filing foreclosure 16 a c t i o ~ ~ in Florida was problematic in that MERS 17 was claiming to hold the note and be the only 18 beneficial party with an interest in establishing 19 the note, when we all know that servicers, 20 investors and the GSEs hold the interests and the 21 payments eventually go to them. 22 Also, my research of MERS information and 23 procedures shows that MERS never holds any 24 documents including the note and does not have 25 any beneficial interest in the note. Can we all VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 q 22 1 be in violation of any applicable laws or putting 2 ourselves individually or as,a company for claims 3 by borrowers claiming that MERS is not the owner 4 or holder in due c,Ourse for the loan? I am 5 troubled by this. Can you help? 6 Thanks. 7 The answer. Please contact us directly to 8 discuss your concerns. 9 I think that might be it. So in light of 10 the history and the cases that I've recited to 11 you and the concerns here, having taken judicial , 12 notice of the matters on the websIte, 13 please explain to me whether or not how it can \ '14 be that MERS claims that it owns -- excuse me 15 that it owns and holds the note to prosecute 16 mortgage foreclosure actions and/or for the 17 reestablishment of notes that it owns the note 18 and that they were entitled to enforce them when 19 the note was lost from possession, et cetera. 20 Yes, sir. 21 MR. BROCHIN: Your Honor, you threw a lot 22 out, but I would first suggest that I recognize 23 there are pleadings, many of them that contain 24 inconsistent allegations perhaps -- 25 THE COURT: Excuse me one minute. Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 1 '2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 / 13 ( ~ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. BROCHIN: There are complaints and allegatio,ns that contain inconsistent allegations that certainly need to be amended to state straightforward the standing that MERS has. , I would start with this. I believe I can demonstrat'e to this court without doubt and I I I prpperly allege MERS is the real ' party in int'erest who has appropriate standing to bring these foreclosure actions. THE COURT: Counsel, I notice in your I ' memorandum you make ,reference to a proposed amended complaint. I didn't -- 'I don't have it. MR.BROCHIN: I have a copy fGr you. It was ~ \ filed yesterday. THE COURT: Would you hand it to the clerk and let me take a look at it. " MR. BROCHIN: I will. And I would suggest, Your Honor. THE COURT: Give me, please, just a moment. Okay. I have reviewed it. MR. BROCHIN: And I was going to say I would suggest that that amended complaint, A, demonstrates that MERS has standing as the right party, the real party in interest and as the holder of the note who has physical possession of Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 24 , 1 the note to bring a foreclosure action. I 2 THE COURT: Let's talk about that. Does 3 MERS assert that it owns any of these notes, 'has 4 any beneficial int,erest in any of these notes? 5 MR. BROCHIN: I'm going to take the second' 6 half because I do believe that's a two-part 7 question. As to whether it has a beneficial 8 interest. 9 THE COURT: Yes, sir. 10 MR. BROCHIN: Defining beneficial interest 11 as the investor or lender who iS,ultimately \, 12 entitled to the proceeds of those 'notes o n ~ e they 13 have been collected by MERS and enforced by MERS \ '14 the answer is no. I would add strongly that the 15 beneficial interest in the notes by anyone, MERS, 16 servicers or any entity coming before the court 17 is totally irrelevant under Florida law as to 18 whether they are the real party in interest to 19 bring the foreclosure action. 20 THE COURT: You mentioned the word servicer. 21 Would you explain to me what you understand a 22 servicer to be under the MERS system. 23 MR. BROCHIN: The notes being negotiable 24 instruments travel through the markets, they go 25 from the original lender perhaps to a secondary VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 25 1 market like Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mae and Freddie '2 Mac. They may in turn sell it to third-party 3 investors, mutual funds, title insurance 4 companies and the like. , 5 Servicers arose because of the traveling of 6 those notes to service the notes, collect on·the I I I l.. 7 enforce the terms of the Hotes, and I " 8 basically administer the rights and obligations 9 under the notes on behalf of those various 10 investors as they travel through the market. 11 I THE COURT: MERS is not a servicer? 12 MR. BROCHIN: MERS is not but in 13 a legal sense MERS stands in a simi\pr position , \ 14 to a servicer in its ability to 15 foreclose because-- 16 THE COURT: Who selects the servicer? " 17 MR. BROCHIN: The investors and the lenders. 18 THE COURT: Okay. 19 MR. BROCHIN: Those who ultimately I suppose 20 have that beneficial interest in the notes. The 21 ones who are interested in getting their 22 investment in returns. 23 THE COURT: What is it, please, that MERS 24 does? It's all an affront, isn't it? 25 MR. BROCHIN: MERS electronically registers VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 26 27' 1 the mortgage in their names. The borrower 'the I I 2 borrower takes a loan. On tnat mortgage contract I 3 between the borrower and MERS MERS is the named 4 mortgagee. It says right there MERS is the 5 mortgagee. It says MERS is the mortgagee on that, 6 contract as the nominee for the lender, its 7 successors and assigns. 8 It also says by the way, which I think is of' 9 some importance, that MERS, Mr. Borrower, is the 10 party who will foreclose on your property should 11 there be a default. . h'" I 12 THE COURT: MERS 1S not t e serV1cer, i3 correct? , \ 14 MR. BROCHIN: It is not the servicer. 15 THE COURT: A servicer is a separate 16 independent legal entity, correct? 17 MR. BROCHIN: Separate from MERS, correct. 18 THE COURT: Okay. When these lawsuits are 19 brought, they are brought as nominee for an 20 entity. Is that entity the servicer? 21 MR. BROCHIN: It could be and it should. 22 And I should tell you if it is brought as a 23 nominee or authorized agent for the servicer, it 24 should plead that so the court knows and that's 25 what Florida law requires. And if it pleads it, Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 ,. 1 it pleads it because that servicer is the note '2 holder And the note holder,' not the owner 3 the note holder is the party in Florida who is 4 the real 'party in interest to foreclosure. 5 THE COURT: So the person who owns the 6 note - - st'rike that. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 BROCHIN: Holds it. THE COURT: The person who holds the note, the physical possession of the note is the servicer? 'MR. BROCHIN: In the amended complaint I handed you MERS holds the note. " THE . : okay. You've me this. I , \ haven I t given leave to file it, but we can certainlY discuss it for a moment. Are you assert.;Lng that MERS is saying in good faith that it has ?ctual physical possession of the document? MR. BROCHIN: In that case absolutely. Not only of the document. It has physical possession of the note, it is the payee of the note under Florida law becaUse the note is endorsed - - that note is endorsed in blank. Under Florida law if a note is endor$ed in blank and transferred to MERS I which i t and alleged, MERS is the payee because tl1 e ;y are the bearer of the note and -- Verit lOrida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving tate of Florida (305) 376-8800 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ( 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 so not only do they have physical possession, they are the named payee and, therefore the holder of the note. THE COURT: I,s this the common practice for MERS to have physical possession? MR. BROCHIN: When it comes to foreclosures? THE COURT: Yes, sir. MR. BROCHIN: It is the preferred practice. THE COURT: Take a look, if you would, please, on Tab Number 14. the website " mortgage foreclosures in Florida it sets fbrth \ what the procedure is. Let's together. \ MR. BROCHIN: If you could just tell us where we are at. THE COURT: Okay. Let's -- we'll read it. It says: Foreclosing a loan in the name of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. is something new in the foreclosure arena. However, when the role of MERS is examined, it becomes clear that MERS stands in the same position to foreclose as the servicer. MERS, like the servicer, will be the mortgagee of record. Skipping down. It says: The body of the complaint should be the same as when foreclosing Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 2cJ 1 in the name of the servicer. MERS stands in the '2 same shoes as the servicer to' the extent that it 3 is not beneficial owner of the promissory note. 4 As an investor, typically a secondary market , 5 investor, will be the owner of the note. 6 Then 'it goes on to say that employees of the 7 will be certifying officers of MERS.' 8 Thi's means that they are authorized to sign any 9 necessary documents as an officer of MERS. The 10 certifying officer is granted the power by 11 I ' corporate from MERS. ,In other words, 12 the same individual that signs document for 13 the servicer will continue to sign but \ 14 now as an officer of MERS. 15 If you look there at Footnote Number 1. It 16 says: I, Even though the servicer has physical 17 custody, of the note, custom in the mortgage 18 industry is that the investor (Fannie Mae, 19 Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae or the private 20 investor) owns the beneficial rights to the 21 promissory note. 22 Footnote Number 2. If the promissory note 23 is endorsed in blank and the servicer has 24 physical custody of the note, the servicer will 25 technically be the note holder as well as the Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 l 13 , 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 recorded mortgage holder. By virtue of having the servicer', s employees be the certifying officer of MERS, there can be an in-house transfer or posses,sion of the note so that MERS is considered the note holder for the purpose of foreclosing the loan. Counsel, it just really doesn't seem to me 31' that in truth MERS holds anything. It looks like' under their own procedure they do not have physical custody of the instrument. MR. BROCHIN: Well, actually what was said \ there is all accurate in terms of\the status. THE COURT: Okay. \ MR. BROCHIN: Let me just by contrast draw a comparison to another case, Spencer Gordon, which is before you. THE COURT: No, no, talk about this. You represented to me because I'm concerned about the allegations made by this company that they own and hold the note. Maybe they hold it. They don't hold it. Their procedure reflects that they don't hold it. That the servicer holds it, which is a separate legal entity. That a charade of sorts has been instituted to have some resolution instituted that says, okay, well, VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 1 we're going to pretend like you're our employee '2 so thetef,ore, although you have physical custody, 3 wherever you are, we are going to say we have 4 custody. ' That doesn't seem honest. 5 MR. BROCHIN: Well, I take exception to 6 the suggestion that it's either dishonest or some 7 I 'I sort of charade. MERS as a independent 8 company certifies as officers of MERS individuals 9 and you can certainly be -- 10 11 12 13 14 THE COURT: What does that mean? I MR. BROCHIN: It means that they say, Mr. , Jones, you are an officer, secretary, vice president or the like of MERS. I' You certainly \ in any entity serve as an officer of more than 15 one company. So they are an officer with 16 fiduci,?-ry relationships to MERS I with fiduciary 17 to counsel they hire and then they 18 go out and they hire counsel on behalf of MERS. 19 They act and talk and speak and make 20 representations as officers of MERS. Do they at 21 the same time simultaneously perhaps serve as an 22 officer or an agent of a different entity? 23 Perhaps. But that doesn't take away nor does it 24 make it in any way illegitimate the fact that 25 they are at that time an officer of MERS who Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 32 1 hires counsel to come to this court to represent 2 MERS and say'I got the note.' 3 THE COURT: But let me ask you this. Who 4 has discretion, cO,ntrol over the note, the 5 payment and the like? Is it MERS, the server or 6 the holder? Strike that. Or the investor. Who 7 does MERS listen to? Or does it have its own 8 discretion? If they hold it, they can do what 9 they want with it or do they follow directions? 10 MR. BROCHIN: I think ultimately they are 11 the holder, which again I need to'underscore is " 12 perfectly not only legitimate under law, 13 it is the preferred way. They go out they '14 collect on these notes, file suits on these 15 notes, enforce these notes and foreclose for 16 these people who have the ultimate beneficial 17 interest in the notes who would ultimately be the 18 ones to give the direction because they are the 19 ones who are going to ultimately receive the 20 proceeds of those notes. 21 THE COURT: So we go back -- one second. We 22 go back again to the question is you're asserting 23 although the separate entity holds the physical 24 paper, because MERS promulgates a resolution 25 making the same individuals -- of course one VeritextlFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Servin!! the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 33' w , ' 1 doesn't know what the organization is or who the '2 c,ustodian i,s and thes'e things, but your 3 belief is whoever these people are can be made 4 employees of MERS such that MERS can legitimately 5 allege that it holds the note. And the question 6 is who has' the ultimate say- so over the note; 7 Wh9selciirection, if any, does MERS follow? 8 MR. BROCHIN: I would say the person, entity 9 who ultimately is going to -- who owns the note 10 in a beneficial way who is going to -- whose 11 money it is to be collected. They are the ones , 12 that the servicers serve and they are the ones 13 that are members of MERS who they take \ I' 14 direction from. 15 THE COURT: Take a look, if you would, 16 please". 17 MR. BROCHIN: And it says so by the way in 18 the agreements that MERS enters into with 19 members. These owners, if you will -- 20 THE COURT: I do want to go over that 21 agreement. Take for a moment if you would, 22 please. Take a look at Tab Number 9. 23 MR. BROCHIN: Your Honor, just as a point. 24 All these owners, these people that you say that 25 are out there, they are all members of MERS so VeritextlFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 34 1 these aren't some strangers out there. In fact 2 if they are not members of MERS, then these 3 actions aren't brought. So they are all members 4 of MERS who are pa,rt of this organization in 5 terms of being membership and subject to the 6 rules of the agreement. 7 THE COURT: Take a look, if you would, 8 please, at Tab 9 which is the rules of 9 membership. And if you would go please to Page 10 26 -- actually before you reach Page 26, go if 11 you would, please, to Page 10. I am reading 12 under Section 4, Sub B and 13 registration of MERS which says: long as \ 14 there are no contrary instructions, when the 15 beneficial ownership of a mortgage loan 16 registered on the MERS system is vested in a 17 non-member MERS and Mortgage Electronic 18 Registration Systems, Inc. shall at all times 19 comply with the instructions of the members shown 20 on the MERS system as the servicer of such 21 mortgage loan with respect to transactions 22 relating to such mortgage loan. 23 Then if I might, please, direct you to Page 24 13, Subsection 6. It says: MERS shall at all 25 times comply with the instructions of the holder VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 35' , ' 1 of mortgage loan promissory notes. '2 I'will read ib again. MERS shall at all 3 times comply with the instructions of the holder 4 of mortgage loan promissory notes. In the 5 absence of contrary instructions from the 6 beneficial' owner, MERS and Mortgage Electronic 7 Regist.rcition Systems, Inc. may rely on 8 ins'tructions from the servicer shown on the MERS 9 system in accordance with these rules and the 10 procedures with respect to transfers of beneficiai The beneficial owner shall , 11 12 give any such instructions to and Mortgage 13 Electronic Registration Systems! in writing , \ 14 and they may rely, et cetera. 15 It looks like the procedures belie your 16 assertJon that you are the holder. It seems like 17 the is somebody else. You're looking to 18 someone else who is -- who you say is the holder 19 and owner to tell you what to do. How do you 20 reconcile this with your assertion that you are 21 the holder when your procedure suggests that 22 you're taking directions from the holder? 23 MR. BROCHIN: Because the notes can change 24 status as holders. Initially, for example, the 25 servicer may not be the holder. It's held in Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 36 11-\ ---------------,,< '>,,...------------. 31 1 custody as the note is performing. The note is 2 transferred possession is, transferred often 3 when it's time to foreclose on the note. In' 4 other words, when ,you're transferring possession 5 of a note, you can do so for the purposes of 6 maintaining a foreclosure action. So they may 7 not, MERS, hold the note initially, they may not 8 hold the note ever but when it comes to the point' 9 of foreclosure, they either will hold the note or 10 they are filing the suit as the authorized agent 11 on behalf of that note holder. 12 THE COURT: When you say they hold the note, 13 '" are you saying notwithstanding the set '14 forth in your manual that they have physical 15 possession and not some other entity that they 16 give some resolution to? If so, where is the 17 depository or where is that? Where do they 18 collect these documents? Where would one go at 19 MERS to take a look at it. If you were to call 20 MERS and say I really want to see thi$ note. 21 Where would one go to look at it? 22 MR. BROCHIN: MERS, as a matter of course, 23 does not hold the notes. They only become 24 holders of the notes if they need to foreclose. 25 And I may add they are not necessarily the holder VeritextlFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 1 of the note even on a foreclosure action because '2 as I'm'trying to suggest in Florida particularly, 3 you don't need -- if you're acting on behalf of 4 that holder of the note as his agent, you are the 5 party appropriate to file the foreclosure action. 6 THE COURT: But you don't allege you're 7 'on behalf of the holder. I You allege you 8 hold it. 9 MR. BROCHIN: In that case, correct. 10 THE COURT: In all the cases. 11 I MR. BROCHIN: In that case :- no, well. " 12 I'll get to that in a minute. In"that case MERS 13 holds the note. Its counsel has -- MERS' counsel \ , 14 has the note. Its lawyer -- that's where you 15 would go and quite frankly as the court would say 16 you to proffer the note to me because I need 17 to see that note and if it alleges, which it did 18 in this case, that it has actual physical 19 possession, it will, as required by law, 20 proffer -- 21 THE COURT: Notwithstanding these procedures 22 that say -- that says MERS really doesn't 23 actually hold it, the servicer holds it. You 24 give them a resolution and we tell the court 25 because they're, quote, our employees, I guess we Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 38 " 1 kind of hold it. You're saying notwithstanding 2 this you're saying that they really do hold it. I 3 MR. BROCHIN: No, I'm saying the servicer 4 often doesn't h o l ~ the note. Let's say a note is 5 performing. The servicer doesn't hold the note.'· 6 THE COURT: Well, who does? 7 MR. BROCHIN: The investor. 8 THE COURT: Oh, okay. 9 MR. BROCHIN: In custody holds the note. 10 THE COURT: Well, who is the investor? 11 Okay. You don't know. Okay. So you say, \. 12 but MERS itself doesn't have a place, a big safe 13 like the clerk's office, that it hoItls the notes. \ 14 It doesn't say, okay, we are going to file 15 foreclosure action in Florida, you know, send all 16 these notes here to Tampa or wherever and we'll 17 hold them here and -- or send them to a central 18 location. That's not done, is it? 19 MR. BROCHIN: No, MERS doesn't have a 20 central depository where it holds notes for the 21 pending foreclosure actions. What MERS does 22 do 23 THE COURT: Yes, sir. 24 MR. BROCHIN: The servicer has those notes, 25 holds those notes, and either that officer of Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 1 '2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ( 13 'c 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MERS then either authorizes MERS to go ahead, file suit and eithe,r will transfer physical possession, which it did in the case before you, or the servicer then may hold the note and , authorize MERS to go ahead and foreclose on its behalf. TH 'El COURT: Go back, if you I would, please, to my earlier question. The assertion that MERS owns the note. You talked about owning and you talked about holding. MERS does not own any of I ' these notes, does it? MR. BROCHIN: I thought about that question for manyc weeks. *' ~ \ THE COURT: It's been in your system since 2002. MR. BROCHIN: " It's been in my head for about 30 days, so let me give you the answer I think is appropriate in the context here. And I don't mean to sound evasive but I do think it's the right answer. It really depends when you say or anyone says what we mean by own the note. And I have researched this and quite frankly find it a vague term and so I answer it this way. If you mean owns the note that it has some beneficial interest ultimately to the proceeds, I tell you VeritextlFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 zaa; 40 -'-------------------------------------- 41' 1 MERS does not own the note. 2 But ownership can mean something different. 3 There's equitable ownership and there's legal 4 ownership. And as, I read the cases, I think it 5 is very fair to say that what ownership means is 6 that I have that note or I am acting on behalf of 7 somebody who has that note for the purpose of 8 enforcing it and the purpose of foreclosing and 9 the purpose of collecting on it and therefore I 10 am legitimately the right party vis-a-vis these 11 debtors to show up and knock on ydur door and 12 demand payment because I, MERS, ownt..rat note 13 appropriately in the sense of owning abd holding. , 14 THE COURT: Let me ask you the question 15 unless I interrupted you. 16 MR. BROCHIN: I was just going to add that-- 17 THE COURT: Counsel, would you feel more 18 comfortable being seated? I know you have been 19 up there a long time. 20 MR. BROCHIN: No, I am fine, but I would 21 add -- and I appreciate that. I would add that 22 when you then read the cases since before the 23 turn of the century and particularly Florida 24 Statutes, my explanation makes sense because what 25 those cases and what those statutes say is that Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC 1 when you foreclose ownership is not relevant. '2 You can foreclose, 'you can collect and you can 3 sue on those notes even though you don't own it. 4 THE 'COURT: Okay. Stop. What is the , 5 difference between what you're saying your 6 interpreta'tion of ownership is and someone who I 'I h 7 holds the note? Or are you sayi g there is rio 8 'difference? 9 MR. BROCHIN: Well, no, I make a distinction 10 between the term -- again, depends what you mean I 11 by owner. Owner of the note. 12 THE COURT: Yes, sir. \, 13 MR. BROCHIN: I've got cases h e ~ e to suggest ~ \ 14 it's at length, but particularly the ,Florida 15 Statute. The holder of the note is someone who 16 has po.13session of the note. 17 THE COURT: And can enforce it. 18 MR. BROCHIN: And therefore can enforce it. 19 THE COURT: Okay. Are you saying that if 20 one is holder who has possession and has the 21 legal right to enforce it that they are 22 necessarily the owner? 23 MR. BROCHIN: That's the part I can't -- to 24 be honest I don't know. I don't think they are 25 necessarily the owner. VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 42 1 THE COURT: I don't think so either. I 2 MR. BROCHIN: ,But if you describe owner as 3 beneficial interest, no, theY're not necessarily 4 the owner and they're not the owner. They are 5 only the party or the entity with the right 6 legally. 7 THE COURT: They hold it. 8 MR. BROCHIN: No, they hold it. 9 THE COURT: They hold it. 10 MR. BROCHIN: And that's what makes them 11 under Florida law entitled to enforce it because 12 they hold it regardless if they o ~ n it, 13 regardless if they're entitled to tfie beneficial \ , 14 interest of it. 15 THE COURT: Before we go into that, take a 16 look if you would, please, on Tab 8 which is the 17 terms and conditions of the agreement that's been 18 mentioned here. I see on Paragraph 2 of the 19 second sentence it says, MERS shall serve as 20 mortgagee of record with respect to all such 21 mortgage loans solely as a nominee, in an 22 administrative capacity, for the beneficial owner 23 or owners thereof from time to time. MERS shall 24 have no rights whatsoever to any payments made on 25 account of such mortgage loans, to any servicing Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 43' 1 rights related to such mortgage loans, or any '2 or to any mortgaged· properties securing such . 3 mortgage loans. MERS agrees not to assert any 4 rights with respect to such mortgage loans or , 5 mortgaged properties. 6 Skipping down to Paragraph 3. MERS shall at ., "t .J... 7 all tlmes comply with the of the' I , 8 holder of mortgage loan promissory notes. In the 9 absence of contrary instructions from the note 10 holder, MERS shall comply with instructions from , ' 11 the servicer shown on the MERS s¥stem in " 12 accordance with rules and procedures of MERS. 13 Paragraph 6. MERS and its members agree, \ 14 one, MERS system is not a vehicle for. creating or 15 transferring beneficial interests in mortgage 16 loans." Number 2, transfers of servicing 17 interests reflected on the MERS system are 18 subject to the consent of the beneficial owner of 19 the mortgage loans. So-- 20 MR. BROCHIN: If you're talking again and 21 asking me beneficial interest. 22 THE COURT: Okay. 23 MR. BROCHIN: Beneficial owner which the law 24 recognizes various types of ownership. I, again, 25 represent MERS is not the -- has -- does not have VeritextlFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 • 44 1 the beneficial interest in the notes. I 2 THE COURT: Do you believe Florida law 3 permits a person to institute a mortgage 4 foreclosure action, without alleging that they own 5 and hold the note? 6 MR. BROCHIN: I do. I do. 7 THE COURT: Have you checked the form? 8 MR. BROCHIN: I have. And I know -- 9 THE COURT: Can you explain then why the 10 Supreme Court would oblige you to allege that you 11 both own it and hold it and you're saying I only \ 12 have to allege I hold it? " , 13 MR. BROCHIN: First of all the ~ e a s o n I \ 14 believe that it is because I have read at least 15 ten cases that tell you you don't need to own the 16 note to initiate a foreclosure action, including 17 cases from the Florida Supreme Court, 18 including -- 19 THE COURT: Do you have any of those cases 20 here? 21 MR. BROCHIN: Absolutely. In fact what I 22 have prepared for the court is -- this is Judge 23 Logan's order who dealt with beneficial interests. 24 25 THE COURT: Yes, I have Judge Logan's order. MR. BROCHIN: And I did want to speak to the Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 45' 1 court about that but attached to that -- '2 TBE COURT: Ye,s, sir. 3 MR. BROCHIN: Is all the cases that suggest 4 ownership or beneficial interest ownership is not 5 necessary to a case. 6 THE COURT: Counsel, you're welcome to give 7 , 't that to the clerk, but why don't' we talk some law 8 for a second. 9 MR. BROCHIN: Okay. 10 THE COURT: First of all Florida form 1.946, t ' 11 Paragraph -- strike ,that. That's the wrong one. 12 1.944, Paragraph 3. Plaintiff owns and holds the 13 note. ~ ~ \ 14 MR. BROCHIN: That I s the form. ,There I s no 15 question of form. Now-- 16 TitlE COURT: One second, please. 17 The case of Edason, E-D-A-S-O-N, versus 18 Central Farmers Trust. A bill to foreclose a 19 mortgage should show that it is brought in the 20 name of the owner of the debt secured by the 21 mortgage. 22 There are any number of cases that support 23 the proposition. Next case. Your Construction 24 Center, Inc. versus Gross found at 316 So2d 596, 25 Fourth District. When the plaintiff files his Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 46 " 1 complaint, he must necessarily allege that he 'is 2 the owner and holder of the mortgage note. On 3 and on and on. 4 MR. BROCHIN: ,Well, not on and on. Look 5 THE COURT: Give me the cases that say you' 6 don't have to allege it. 7 MR. BROCHIN: I will. Okay. Troupe versus 8 Redner. 9 THE COURT: Pass it up. Give me the cite. 10 MR. BROCHIN: 652 So2d 394, Second District, 11 1995. To foreclose upon a -- I'm quoting. To , 12 foreclose upon a promissory note the 13 must be the holder in order to be real party \ 14 in interest. 15 THE COURT: Okay. 16 MR. BROCHIN: The holder is the person who 17 is in possession of the note endorsed in blank. 18 THE COURT: If you will show me the case, 19 please. I'll look at it. I didn't hear it say 20 you don't have to allege you're the owner. It 21 just says you've got to allege you're the holder 22 by all means. Let me take a look at it. 23 24 25 MR. BROCHIN: I've got more. THE COURT: Give me a moment. MR. BROCHIN: I will be glad to. VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 41 1 THE COURT: Yes, sir. Judge Genden, did you '2 have 3 JUDGE GENDEN: Yes, I did have one 4 question.' 5 THE COURT: Counsel, if you would permit 6 me, please', while I look at your case Judge 7 I I I Gepden had a question that he wahted to ask you 8 and as a dear colleague I welcome his inquiry. I 9 hope you do too. So, Your Honor, if you wish to 10 inquire, please do. ; , JUDGE GENDEN: How is it -- because you 11 12 clearly don't possess the note, as you just said, 13 until you're ready to file the How , , 14 can file a count for of a 15 lost note which requires you to allege that at 16 the that it was destroyed or lost it was in 17 your popsession when it clearly was never in your 18 possession? How can you have a count for 19 reestablishment of lost note, which a lot of 20 these cases have, for which you're required to 21 say that at the time that the note was lost or 22 destroyed it was in your possession -- your 23 possession -- MERS -- and you're required to have 24 a lost note affidavit signed by somebody that 25 says that when you just stated to Judge Gordon Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 48 49 1 that at the time that you get ready to file these I 2 lawsuits you get the note? Where is the note? 3 It was never in your possession at the time it 4 was lost because y,Ou could never have brought the 5 lawsuit under your statement because you would ' 6 not have had it in your possession. Where is it 7 at the time it is lost in all of these myriad 8 hundreds of cases which allege that it's in your I 9 possession at the time it was lost or destroyed? 10 And, secondly, if it wasn't in your 11 possession, how can any of us g r ~ n t you relief in , 12 addi tion to all these other argume'nts on a' 13 foreclosure action? \ 14 MR. BROCHIN: Just so I make sure I stated 15 it accurately. I do want to be clear. I did not 16 say in all the foreclosure actions MERS 17 necessarily has physical possession of the notes. 18 I did say there are times, as the case that I 19 just discussed, where MERS does have physical 20 possession. There are also times when MERS files 21 actions to foreclose when it does not hold or 22 have possession of the note but does so on behalf 23 of the entity, usually the servicer, who actually 24 holds. 25 JUDGE GENDEN: Whoa. VeritextlFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 1 MR. BROCHIN: I just want to make sure I , 2 didn It' re,present --, 3 JUDGE GENDEN: You still haven't answered my 4 question.' How can you ever state that at the , 5 time the note was lost or destroyed it was in 6 your posse'ssion when it was never in your 7 I I I . pO,ssesslon because we Just established there 'is 8 no 'depository by which all these notes are being 9 held? How do you do that? I'm curious. 10 MR. BROCHIN: Well, for all those cases I I ' 11 don't know factually each one and how -- 12 JUDGE GENDEN: Well, trust A lot of 13 these cases -- anyone of these here can \ 14 tell you 50 percent, 75 percent. What if it's 30 15 percent? There's a count for reestablishment of 16 a lost" note which the Florida law requires by 17 statute to allege and prove that it was in your 18 possession at the time it was lost or destroyed. 19 Now explain to -me how you can say in a complaint 20 and in a lost note affidavit that at the time the 21 note was lost or destroyed it was in your 22 possession. 23 MR. BROCHIN: I do accept your proffer that 24 many of them do say that. 25 JUDGE GENDEN: Well, I'm sure they will all Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 50 " 1 admit to that. They're sitting here. 2 I MR. BROCHIN:Maybe ask,them how they allege i 3 it, but -- 4 JUDGE GENDEN:, Oh, I'm asking you. You're 5 the one that's arguing on behalf of MERS. 6 MR. BROCHIN: I am, Judge. And I'm going to 7 try to -- 8 JUDGE GENDEN: And it's a legitimate 9 question. 10 MR. BROCHIN: It is and I am going to try to 11 respond. I'm not sure that those pleadings are 12 accurate. I'm not confident that'.there aren't 13 inconsistencies contained in those I \ ·14 don't know. I do know that those pleadings get 15 amended through the course of the foreclosure 16 when those lost notes are recovered and thus 17 subsequently proffered to the court. I do know 18 judges demand that those notes be produced and 19 they in fact are produced. I know Florida law 20 allows you to plead by the way two counts 21 inconsistent with the others. 22 JUDGE GENDEN: Let me make sure that I made 23 myself clear to you. I'm not talking about an 24 inconsistent position. I'm talking about the 25 classic case that all of us have, minimum twice a Veritext/Florida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 51' 1 week, ten times a morning, twice a week in which '2 almost'50 percent or more are'the reestablishment 3 of a lost note because the notes are lost. 4 Nobody is coming back to us, take my word for it, , 5 weeks later saying, Judge, by the way we found 6 the note. ' Those cases are they're defaulted, I I I L.. 7 th,ey're summary judgments, judgments are entered, 8 sares are instituted, new buyers take the 9 property and that's the end of it. 10 11 12 13 14 I'm asking two questions. How can these ; , lawyers allege that at the time note was lost , or destroyed it was in the possession of MERS when it's not true? And if it's not'true, how \ can we even consider going forward with a 15 foreclosure? Because you then clearly do not 16 have because you have violated the 17 Florida law by filing a false affidavit that says 18 I'm the one who was in possession of this note at 19 the time it was lost or stolen. 20 MR. BROCHIN: Judge, I don't know if that's 21 a problem in foreclosure pleadings that's 22 particular to MERS. My understanding is lost 23 note affidavits and lost note counts are 24 routinely filed by mortgagees and note holders, 25 but that doesn't answer your question. VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800 52 " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ( " 13 " 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 53' JUDGE GENDEN: No, it doesn't. A lot of I lawyers appear in front of me and they know, I say to them, where is your lost note affidavit because, you know" you just can't file a claim for reestablishment of a lost instrument without following the Florida statute and if you're filing an affidavit that says it was in my possession, me, MERS, the only plaintiff, at the I time it was lost or stolen and it's not true, why isn't that a fraud on the court and why doesn't that stop the whole process in its tracks? , MR. BROCHIN: Well, I know t'he statut'e on lost notes has been recently \ where the predecessor or the one who held it previously could have lost it and you can now establish a lost note. No one should file a false affidavit saying they have possession of a note when in fact they don't have possession of the note. JUDGE GENDEN: Okay. MR. BROCHIN: I mean I don't have a better answer for you other than that. JUDGE GENDEN: Let me ask this last question. You're the MERS lawyer here today. Take my word for it that those counts are filed VeritextiFlorida Reporting Co.,LLC Serving the State of Florida (305) 376-8800