Transcript
ANNEX 3-1 PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual Module 5 of SMR
ZPI PHILIPPINES, INC.
PROPONENT’S NAME
MONITORING PERIOD COVERED: JULY TO DECEMBER 2010
I.
BASIC PROJECT INFORMATION AND UPDATES
ECC Control No/REFERENCE Code No: ECC-4A-2001-562-112 Project Title: ZPI PHILIPPINES, INC. Project Type: Manufacturing of Plastic Injected Parts Location: PEZA-Cavite Economic Zone Rosario, Cavite Project Coordinates: __________________________ Project Stage/Phase: (i.e. construction; commissioning, etc.) Operational Contact Person: Mr. Katsuhiko Sasaki EMP Approval: During ECC Application Stage Updated after ECC Issuance; approved on _________n/a_________ Changes in Project Design (if any): _________________________________________ ____________________________N/A_______________________________________
II.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table II-1. Summary of Major Findings for the Monitoring Period Condition / Requirement / Commitment Compliance Status & Summary of Actions taken Complied Complied None None Complied Accredited PCO and attended training for EMS concerns. Recommendation/Co mmitment for the next reporting Continuous monitoring. Continuous monitoring There is no exceedance. There was no Complaint.
Compliance with ECC Compliance with EMP Implementation of appropriate & effective env’tal impact remedial actions in case of exceedances Complaints Management Realistic and sufficient budget for conducting the environmental monitoring and audit activities Accountability - qualified personnel are charged with the routine monitoring of the project activities in terms of education, training, knowledge and experience of the environmental team Others . . .
Reporting
-
There were no major activities that affect and influenced the monitoring parameters during the monitoring period. Since the Standby Generator Set (450 kVA-capacity) was categorized as small source, it will be tested every other year with 3 sampling runs for air quality. Ambient quality will be tested every year. Test sampling was done last October 22, 2009. The next sampling will be after two years for air quality as stated on DENR Implementation of the Memorandum Circular No. 2007-003 otherwise known as the Policy on Compliance and Permitting for Industrial Facilities Relating to Air Quality under page 2: For small source(s) it should be tested once on the first year of its 1
ANNEX 3-1 PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual Module 5 of SMR operation to verify its compliance. Thereafter, it should be tested once every other/second year. Each test shall consist of three sampling runs.
III. A.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Compliance Monitoring Table 1. Summary Status of ECC & EMP Compliance
ECC/EMP Condition/Requirement Categorization Relevant ECC Condition/s (if any) #/s Requirement Description The production capacity Shall not exceed Ten Million (10,000,000) pcs. Of Plastic Parts for electronic and telecommunication products per annum Injection Machine; Generator Set (standby) Licensing & Permits: Annually, submitted to PEZAEHSD Monitored and complying Settings of baseline are integrated to the EMS based reports. MOA signed and MMT formed Status of Complianc e ( if complying) REMARKS Production Capacity for: 1st quarter = 630,496 2nd quarter = 471,651 3rd Quarter = _________ 4th Quarter = _________ Expiration of Permit-ToOperate: Aug. 27, 2010 All clearances: Licensing and Permits has been secured Continuous monitoring Continuous monitoring Continuous monitoring Submission of SMR/CMR for approval and evaluation for the period of Oct-Dec 2010 / Jul-Dec 2010 Integrated Quality management System
1)
Project coverage/limits/
1(opera tional phase)
2) 3)
Components Other sectoral requirements mandated by other agencies to be complied with EMP and updates as deemed required Conduct of baseline, compliance and impact selfmonitoring Multi-sectoral Monitoring (as
may be required)
4) 5)
2(Preoperatio nal phase) 1(Preoperatio nal phase) ECC conditio n N/A N/A 1(Preoperatio nal phase)
6)
7)
Regular reporting
SMR/CMR
8)
Institutional arrangements necessary for implementation of environmental management measures Standard DENR requirement on transfer of ownership
N/A
9)
2(Set on ECC Conditio n) N/A CM Table #2 (ECC conditio n) N/A
ISO Certified by Certification International (a third party auditor): EMS 14001 & QMS 9001 Written notification within 15 days from such transfer to the DENR-R4A office None Maintenance & Monitoring of the Mitigation Plan and its Implementation None
There is NO transfer of ownership N/A Aspects and Impacts are monitored and under the EMS based program of the proponent N/A
10) Standard DENR requirement on abandonment 11) Impact Mitigation Plan or Construction/ Contractor’s Environmental Program 12) Social Development Plan (SDP)
2
ANNEX 3-1 PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual Module 5 of SMR
13) IEC Plan 14) Contingency/Emergency Response Plan or equivalent Risk Management Plan 15) Abandonment Plan (when applicable) N/A N/A None With established Emergency Response Team and its Implementing guidelines. None Summarized EMP on Air Quality, Water Quality, Toxic & Hazardous Waste and Solid waste management. N/A Documents and records are well secured. N/A Complied with the monitoring report; Test Samplings and Results. -
16) Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMoP)
-
17) (Others)
-
-
For the Submission for the Reporting of CMR of the proponent for the period of July to December 2010, and all the condition on the ECC was complied.
B.
Impact Monitoring
Table 2. Summary Status of Environmental Impact Management and Monitoring Plan Implementation
Stan dard / EIS Predi ction Envt’l Mgmt. Measure Remark s (EQPL* commit ment, if any)
Monitori ng Objectiv e
Envt’l Aspect
Envt’l Impact
Monito ring Param eter
Sampling & Measurement
Stn/ Locn To determi ne Air Quality Air Emission of standby power generator Air Pollution SOx, NOx, TSP, CO
Results Previo Curre us nt
CO=10 6.50 CO=286. 30 SO2=128 .26 NO2=925 .02 CO=5 00mg/ Ncm SO2= 1500 mg/Nc m NO2= 2000 mg/Nc m
Guard House/ Parkin g Area
SO2=20 .84 NO2=7 4.63
NO EQPLs. Continu ous monitori ng Continu ous monitori ng
To determi ne Air Quality
Delivery and business Air truck/vehicle pollution that produces/gene rates Air Emissions and Dust
TSP, SOx, NOx,
Compa ny Truck Compa ny Vehicle
Emissio n Test Conduct ion Before registrat ion. Checkin g and monitori ng of Vehicles function .
3
ANNEX 3-1 PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual Module 5 of SMR
Comply with RA 6969 Plant Operation Health hazards Soil and water pollution Numbe r of accide nts and oil spills Storag e facilitie s of hazard ous waste Inside the plant site Provisio n of Protecti ve and safety devices/ equipm ent Proper storage of hazardo us waste Treatme nt of hazardo us waste To manage solid waste generat ed Plant operation may result to solid waste generation Health hazards Soil and water pollution Vol. of solid waste genera ted recycle d, reuse and properl y dispos ed N/A Inside the plant site Implem entation of solid waste manage ment progra m Continu ous monitori ng Continu ous monitori ng
To conserv e natural resourc es
Use of electricity for lighting, air conditioning, & other office equipment.
Depletion of natural Resource s
Compan y wide campai gn for energy conserv ation and awaren ess Inside the plant site Outsid e the plant site Inside the plant site Outsid e the plant site 18 μg/Nc m 25 μg/Nc m 26 μg/Nc m 13 μg/Nc m 64.21 dB 55.34 dB 90d B in 8hrs of expo sure
Continu ous monitori ng
Working Environ mental Measure ment
Ambient condition
Health hazards
Total suspen ded particu late, μg/Nc m
Continu ous monitori ng
Working Environ mental Measure ment
Generation of noise due to operation of machine
Noise pollution
Decibe l
Continu ous monitori ng
*EQPL-Environmental Quality Performance Level
o o o
Alert or Red Flag - early warning Action Level-point where management measures must be employed so as not to reach the regulated threshold or limit level, or to reduce deterioration of affected environmental component to pre-impact or optimum environmental quality Limit Level-regulated threshold of pollutant (standard that must not be exceeded); point where emergency response measures must be employed to reduce pollutants to lower than standard limit.
4
ANNEX 3-1 PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual Module 5 of SMR o
NOTE: Section on EQPLs may be filled out as a Proponent’s draft commitment or after these have been established and mutually agreed upon among Proponent, EMB and other MMT members. Otherwise, only the LIMIT Level shall be the reference for regulatory compliance. This means that environmental management measures are formulated at the “ACTION level” so as not to exceed this regulated threshold.
Table 3. Report on Status of Environmental Budget Allocations and Expenses
Budget Expense Item* Direct from Co. √ N/A N/A Re-used materials Budget for MMT N/A N/A N/A N/A Actual Expenses Direct Co. Expense √ N/A N/A Re-used materials MMT expenses N/A N/A N/A N/A
A. Implementation of Management Plans & Programs
1) Environmental Impact Mitigation Plan 2) Social Development Plan 3) IEC Plan 4) Enhancement Programs (if any)
B. Implementation of Monitoring Plans
1) Self-Monitoring 10,000 10,000 2) Environmental Monitoring Fund (with N/A 20,000 N/A 6,825.94 MMT) 3) Environmental Guarantee N/A N/A N/A N/A Fund TOTALS 10, 000 20,000 10, 000 6,825.94 *For mining projects, equivalent cost items shall be adopted, e.g. SDMP in lieu of SDP.
IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Compliance Status All the conditions set under the ECC of the proponent was complied and attained. There were no exceedance of plant production and it is shown on table 1. All Effluent and emission was conformed through the standards of DAO 2000-81. Before the registration of the company vehicle and delivery truck, emission testing was done. According to the DENR Memorandum released last July 2008, that any diesel generator set rated at 301 kw to 599 kw should be tested once every other/second year that consists of three (3) sampling runs. The Generator Set owned by the proponent was under the small source which should have a three sampling runs of testing, this was done Last October 2009 in compliance to the permit for industrial facilities with air emissions. ZPI Philippines, Inc. is certified to Integrated Management system, the programs set under the ISO 9001 and 14001, was align to the EMP under the conditions of the ECC. The program set under EMS (Environmental management System) is continuously and properly monitored. There is Segregation of the solid wastes, conservation and reduction of energy and water consumptions. On the Hazardous Waste management, provision of locations and area are done, properly maintenance and posting of guidelines on how to avoid human health and risk. Provision of proper PPE (personal protective equipment) and training under Hazardous Waste Management was done under the training of PCO. B. Environmental Management Plan Status ⇒ EMP of the proponent is consistent in complying with the Implementation set under the ECC conditions. The stated mitigation/enhancement measures are scheduled. EMP is monitored and maintained through the company wide programs for improvement and enhancement, such as:
o
AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT: o Test sampling for the standby generator set. Records of data gathered and monitored are secured; also the sampling results are well secured for legal and future references. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT: o Records of laboratory and sampling results are well secured for the reference and basis for the monitoring. TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT: Storage for hazardous wastes is provided to avoid contamination to other wastes such as residual and Compostable materials. Hazardous wastes are monitored and maintained before final disposal (of any toxic/hazardous wastes for treatment) to any treatment facilities that treated the hazardous wastes. It is properly labeled according to its classification and segregated to other untreated hazardous wastes. 5
ANNEX 3-1 PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual Module 5 of SMR o Accumulation of hazardous wastes is very minimal. A record from the previous monitoring is well secured. Uniform manifest form of the TSD facility and the waste generator is issued by the LGU for security purposes. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT: o Solid wastes are segregated through the provided trash bins, and it is integrated in the proponents Environmental Management System. It is monitored by the disposal committee; Residual wastes are hauled and disposed every month or by call as scheduled, and under PEZA accredited residual haulers.
C.
WORK PLAN FOR NEXT MONITORING PERIOD
Seeking for accredited Transporter, treater, storage and disposal facilitator for the Final disposal of the hazardous wastes.
PREPARED BY: Engr. Robert E. Ulatan/PCO Name/Position ZPI PHILIPPINES, Inc. Proponent/Company Name January 14, 2011 Date
NOTED BY: Mr. Katsuhiko Sasaki/President Name/Position ZPI PHILIPIPPINES, INC. Proponent/Company Name January 14, 2011 Date
6